On 08/05/13 14:47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've been planning on adding these for years. Maybe it's about time soon. I
guess they could be added already to v2.2, but enabled only by a new setting
because it requires file format changes that old Dovecots can't then read. I
could probably patch
On 08/02/2013 02:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 09:22 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 07/28/13 13:49, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
I would like to convert my custom POP/IMAP proxy to Dovecot's. In this
proxy I do more than giving back user name, password and the host and
I need
On 07/28/13 13:49, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
I would like to convert my custom POP/IMAP proxy to Dovecot's. In this
proxy I do more than giving back user name, password and the host and
I need extra information.
Luckily all of them are available as variables, but more than one
comes as user
Hi,
I would like to convert my custom POP/IMAP proxy to Dovecot's. In this
proxy I do more than giving back user name, password and the host and I
need extra information.
Luckily all of them are available as variables, but more than one comes
as user input (like user name and cleartext
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate from the deprecated autocreate plugin to the
mailbox { auto }setting without success.
What do I forget, or misunderstand?
I deliver mails via LMTP and log in on IMAP, neither of them create the
folders other than the inbox itself.
# doveconf -n
# 2.2.2:
On 05/23/13 14:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.5.2013, at 14.26, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
I'm trying to migrate from the deprecated autocreate plugin to the mailbox {
auto }setting without success.
What do I forget, or misunderstand?
I deliver mails via LMTP and log in on IMAP, neither
On 05/23/13 14:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.5.2013, at 15.06, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
On 05/23/13 14:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.5.2013, at 14.26, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
I'm trying to migrate from the deprecated autocreate plugin to the mailbox {
auto }setting without
On 01/04/13 01:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
- are there any plans to utilize these?
No. Other Maildir tools would probably break if they were used. Dovecot's extra
maildir metadata is placed to dovecot-uidlist file.
That's why I'm asking, I don't want to write a tool, which will break
with a
Hi,
Non-standard fields are mentioned here:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir and they are stated as
currently not used.
Questions:
- am I right that if they will be used, they will be key=value pairs,
like fields in the base filename? Like:
On 03/23/12 22:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In case anyone is interested in reading (and maybe helping!) with a dsync
redesign that's intended to fix all of its current problems, here are some
possibly incoherent ramblings about it:
http://dovecot.org/tmp/dsync-redesign.txt
and even if you don't
On 03/05/12 11:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 9.25, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some
On 03/05/12 13:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 14.15, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some
Hi,
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything
isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my
@dovecot.fi mails. Some issues:
- public namespace isn't replicated at all
- shared namespace is
On 02/26/12 08:22, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Does the FreeBSD Dovecot's port maintainer read this mailing-list ?
If you read it, you may know the answer (depending on which port do you
use).
Hi,
I have this:
Jan 04 15:55:21 pop3(jfm47): Panic: file mail-index.c: line 257
(mail_index_keyword_lookup_or_create): assertion failed: (*keyword != '\0')
Jan 04 15:55:21 master: Error: service(pop3): child 3391 killed with
signal 6 (core not dumped - set service pop3 {
Hi,
On 12/29/2011 01:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
doveadm already supports some nice things, such as being able to remotely
launch a doveadm command via TCP socket. It also supports executing a command
for all users or to some specific users using a wildcard. dsync could use these
features,
On 09/15/11 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 13:32 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for the alternative of qmail's chmod -t (sticky bit on the
maildir root) for Dovecot. What I'm trying to achieve with this lock:
- Dovecot lmtp should give back a temporary error
On 09/15/11 10:39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:25 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
What is the best way to do this? If there is no such thing currently,
would it be hard to implement the sticky bit checking on the root?
dovecot-uidlist.lock basically does this. Dovecot comes
On 09/15/11 11:43, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:37 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
So you have a proxy that decides what backend server the connections are
redirected to? How about you do it completely without locking with
dsync? Moving between servers works basically the same
Hello,
I'm looking for the alternative of qmail's chmod -t (sticky bit on the
maildir root) for Dovecot. What I'm trying to achieve with this lock:
- Dovecot lmtp should give back a temporary error (so the email will be
deferred and re-delivered later)
- all other Dovecot daemons (pop, imap)
Hi,
Sorry for the late answer...
On 06/13/11 15:40, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 20:56 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
Currently Dovecot's LMTPd writes incoming emails to mail_temp_dir if
it's bigger than 128k. But I would like to spare those unnecessary
operations (creating
Hi,
Currently Dovecot's LMTPd writes incoming emails to mail_temp_dir if
it's bigger than 128k. But I would like to spare those unnecessary
operations (creating a file, deleting it, writing into it, reading from
it, checking whether there is free space and if not, rejecting
(temporarily)
Hi,
I try to deliver into specific folders with the plus addressing, namely:
rcpt to:userid+folder@domain
This works only if the folder exists.
If it does not, I get the following error:
rcpt to:userid+Spam@domain
501 5.5.4 Unsupported options
example-config/conf.d/20-lmtp.conf says:
# When
On 06/08/11 12:11, Attila Nagy wrote:
[a lot of things]
Oh crap, it turned out that some binary junk crept into the LMTP
sequence I tried with copy-paste...
On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't
it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web
On 03/08/2011 09:58 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
I think this is clearly related to Dovecot. It handles load very badly
Whoa, pardner, fyi, there are many, many installations humming along
smoothly.
No offense. It may be more correct to say situations, where the OS can't
deliver prompt resources
On 03/08/2011 10:37 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 21:38, schrieb Attila Nagy:
On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all
Hi,
I've recently seen the following issue. A user logs in with pop3, and
sees zero e-mails. The maildir contains emails both in cur and new.
The mail delivery is done with qmail, and this user have had no logins
before, so it has only the inbox, trash and sent (while dovecot is
configured to
On 01/05/2011 11:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2011, at 0.27, Attila Nagy wrote:
With this, 10 syncs would happen in every second from Dovecot LDA processes,
meaning if a client connects in t=0 it will immediately got the response 250,
if a client connects in t=0.05, it will get
Hello,
Currently Dovecot (and any other application, which cares about e-mail
delivery) does at least one fsync per mail delivery. Given that hard
disk drives have a very limited IOPS, this effectively limits the
maximum mail delivery performance to a very low value, under utilizing
the
On 12/21/2010 01:31 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.12.2010, at 13.51, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 11/18/2010 06:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:17 +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
pop3-login: Error: net_connect_unix(pop3) failed: Connection refused
Right. This is the main problem
On 11/18/2010 06:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:17 +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
pop3-login: Error: net_connect_unix(pop3) failed: Connection refused
Right. This is the main problem. So the question becomes why is the
connection being refused.
I would really love to solve
On 12/21/2010 01:31 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.12.2010, at 13.51, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 11/18/2010 06:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:17 +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
pop3-login: Error: net_connect_unix(pop3) failed: Connection refused
Right. This is the main problem
On 12/21/2010 06:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.12.2010, at 19.37, Attila Nagy wrote:
service imap-login {
client_limit = 8
Why imap-login with this small client_limit? The default should be ok (1000).
Because I think that Dovecot's processes block on IO and not just on distinct
IO
On 11/16/10 14:40, Attila Nagy wrote:
The Dovecot wiki states that Dovecot's master restarts all died
processes, which is good for availability. But when I kill
dovecot/auth (to simulate an error condition which happened on a
machine), the authentication fails with:
Nov 16 14:32:40 be dovecot
On 11/16/10 18:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:52 +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
Nov 16 14:32:40 be dovecot: imap: Error: net_connect_unix(auth-master)
failed: No such file or directory
Of course I forgot to tell it's 2.0.6.
2.0.7 fixed this.
Thanks, I've upgraded to it.
BTW, I
Hi,
The Dovecot wiki states that Dovecot's master restarts all died
processes, which is good for availability. But when I kill dovecot/auth
(to simulate an error condition which happened on a machine), the
authentication fails with:
Nov 16 14:32:40 be dovecot: imap: Error:
Hi,
FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE, Dovecot 2.0.6, stops in random times with:
Nov 14 18:42:14 be dovecot: master: Fatal: kevent(): Invalid argument
Any ideas?
Thanks,
On 11/14/2010 07:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.11.2010, at 18.11, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.11.2010, at 18.11, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.11.2010, at 17.52, Attila Nagy wrote:
FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE, Dovecot 2.0.6, stops in random times with:
Nov 14 18:42:14 be dovecot: master: Fatal
Hi,
It seems there is an FD leak in this version. The number of open file
descriptors quickly raise after upgrading from 2.0.4. (I haven't got
more time to look after the issue, it may be obvious from the diffs)
# dovecot -n (after the downgrade)
# 2.0.4: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
On 10/04/10 15:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:27 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
It seems there is an FD leak in this version. The number of open file
descriptors quickly raise after upgrading from 2.0.4.
In which process?
Sorry, I had to quickly downgrade, dovecot ate more than
On 10/04/2010 04:57 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:57 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 10/04/10 15:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:27 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
It seems there is an FD leak in this version. The number of open file
descriptors quickly raise
On 09/27/10 23:26, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Thanks! But shouldn't Avoid fsyncing subscriptions file when it doesn't change or if
mail_fsync=never. be Avoid re-writing subscriptions file when it doesn't change and
fsyncing it if mail_fsync=never.?
I mean (I haven't read the code context) if you
On 09/28/2010 05:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 08:29 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Sadly, I'm one of them. Currently during the provisioning it's not
guaranteed that a user will have a mailbox in the file system, so
autocreating it during pop logins is a bless. :)
But POP3
On 09/28/2010 07:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 19:03 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 09/28/2010 05:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 08:29 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Sadly, I'm one of them. Currently during the provisioning it's not
guaranteed that a user
Hello,
I've tried to set the above in Dovecot 2.0.3, but according to ktrace
(FreeBSD) it still fsync()s a lot (pop3 processes for example).
Is this switch useful at all?
On 09/27/10 15:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:09 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
I've tried to set the above in Dovecot 2.0.3, but according to ktrace
(FreeBSD) it still fsync()s a lot (pop3 processes for example).
Is this switch useful at all?
I did a quick test and didn't see
On 09/27/2010 04:52 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 16:31 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
doveconf -n:
mail_plugins = $mail_plugins quota
One annoying problem about v2.0's doveconf -n output is that it hides
when using multiple var=$var lines.. Did you have more plugins than just
Hello,
Just wondering: Dovecot has gzip/bzip2 compression/decompression support.
According to this:
http://stephane.lesimple.fr/wiki/blog/lzop_vs_compress_vs_gzip_vs_bzip2_vs_lzma_vs_lzma2-xz_benchmark_reloaded
gzip and bzip2 aren't really useful together.
While gzip can offer speed and a
Hi,
I've upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3 and while the former starts, the
latter doesn't (the config is the same). It bails with:
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: ssl-params: Fatal: Dovecot built
without SSL support
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: master: Error: service(ssl-params):
command
On 09/21/2010 05:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 17:21 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
I've upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3 and while the former starts, the
latter doesn't (the config is the same). It bails with:
Sep 21 17:15:32 locsocs dovecot: ssl-params: Fatal: Dovecot built
Hi,
qmail-ldap uses four LDAP attributes for handling autoreplies in
qmail-local:
- deliverymode (to see whether the autoreply should be send)
- mailreplytext, which is a base64 encoded multiline string*
- mailreplystart and mailreplystop, unix dates
I'm wondering how this could be handled
Tony Rutherford wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 20.1.2010, at 22.21, Attila Nagy wrote:
After running through http://wiki.dovecot.org/IndexFiles I'm not
sure how well would Dovecot work with other programs modifying the
maildirs (adding, deleting, moving messages, folders etc).
The Main
Hello,
I have a setup where there are multiple maildir users, one of them being
the pop/imap server itself, the others are for example a maildir capable
webmail and message replication.
I would like to evaluate Dovecot, but I wonder how would its binary
indexes and logs fit into this
54 matches
Mail list logo
