Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

2008-01-10 Thread Brian T Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:26:05AM -0700, Andrew Falanga may have written: In an ideal world, perhaps, no one would setup a mail server unless they knew how to. The trouble is, this position doesn't take into account that we *DON'T* live in an

[Dovecot] [packages] Debian Etch Packages for v1.0.8

2007-12-02 Thread Brian T Glenn
= 842B BC47 E158 4DF1 A385 AA52 EAFD 7923 E88E B53D uid delink.net Internet Services (Debian Signing Key) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sub 2048g/0CAB6F5C 2007-12-01 Thanks, - -- Brian T Glenn http://www.delink.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux

[Dovecot] [Debian] Sarge packages for dovecot 1.0.5 available

2007-09-11 Thread Brian T Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:21:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written: http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.5.tar.gz.sig Packages dovecot-common, dovecot-pop3d, and dovecot-imapd are

[Dovecot] [Debian] Packages available for 1.0.0

2007-06-05 Thread Brian T Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from backports.org and is built for sarge. deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Enjoy, - --

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

2007-03-28 Thread Brian T Glenn
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written: b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) - 1.2.0 (stable) I'd really prefer using type b versioning as then there is no ambiguity when attempting to build packages for dovecot. There are many examples in the Debian