Re: fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 Bad Request / GET null null

2016-04-08 Thread Chris Laif
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> The total request size is 31708 bytes and it contains many (hundreds?) >> of 'OR hdrs' (side note: I wonder which client action triggers these >> kind of requests, maybe the user selected hundreds of mails for >> search?) > > I bet this is th

Re: fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 Bad Request / GET null null

2016-04-08 Thread Chris Laif
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:33, Chris Laif wrote: >> >> I've captured some requests and they look like this (some parts >> changed due to privacy concerns): >> >> GET >> /solr/select?fl=uid,score&

Re: fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 Bad Request / GET null null

2016-04-05 Thread Chris Laif
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> Unfortunately I do not know (yet) which client action produces these >> log lines. "GET null null" seems not to be a sensible request in any >> case. >> >> Anyone seeing the same effect? > > > Did this happen only after upgrade to 2.2.23 or i

fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 Bad Request / GET null null

2016-04-03 Thread Chris Laif
Hi, the log file shows suspicious entries as follows: Apr 3 09:14:49 xxx dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 Bad Request The tomcat7 log shows for this request: 10.0.0.234 - - [03/Apr/2016:09:14:49 +0200] "GET null null" 400 - Dovecot is latest 2.2.23 with a pretty

Store ACL files within shared mailbox / rename shared folder problem

2015-08-17 Thread Chris Laif
Hi. If $otheruser shares a mailbox to $myuser, my private index is stored in *my* Maildir, according to this template (from the dovecot docs): mail_location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEXPVT=%h/Maildir/shared/%%u If $otheruser renames the shared mailbox, all my private mail flags (Seen) are lost be

Re: [Dovecot] Disable/patch iOS7 Full Body Search

2014-03-12 Thread Chris Laif
Nicholas, I think the problem has nothing to do with the number of connections iOS7 opens to the server.I do not get any warnings about too many connections and the problem still persists. I think the problem is the way iOS7 builds the search request (pure sub-string search vs. fuzzy search, see

Re: [Dovecot] Disable/patch iOS7 Full Body Search

2014-03-11 Thread Chris Laif
rt=0 On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Chris Laif wrote: > As mentioned in other posts [1], iOS7 Mail App uses a multi-folder > full body search by default. As to my knowledge, this behavior cannot > be disabled within the Mail App. > > Is there any way to disable/patch this beh

[Dovecot] Disable/patch iOS7 Full Body Search

2014-02-22 Thread Chris Laif
As mentioned in other posts [1], iOS7 Mail App uses a multi-folder full body search by default. As to my knowledge, this behavior cannot be disabled within the Mail App. Is there any way to disable/patch this behavior on the server side? My users complain that searching now takes 'forever'. They w

Re: [Dovecot] Defer emails until the user is ready to deal with them (snooze button / bring-forward file / bring-up file for emails)

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Laif
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> As far as I've learned this is not possible with IMAP: >> - storing the 'do-not-show-until-time' within a custom header-field >> requires down- and uploading of the whole email and therefore causes >> problems especially with large emails >>

Re: [Dovecot] Defer emails until the user is ready to deal with them (snooze button / bring-forward file / bring-up file for emails)

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Laif
> if you do not want to see new mails do not check for > them - no need to mangle messages > > switch TB in the offline-mode or clsoe the mail-client > based on WHAT will wahtever you think you need to implement > dec ide "if the user is ready" > Sorry, but that's not what I meant. After reading a

Re: [Dovecot] Defer emails until the user is ready to deal with them (snooze button / bring-forward file / bring-up file for emails)

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Laif
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > you said "I would like to add a feature to my email-client" so why > do you need to add headers to them? what has the server to do with > this all and why would you touch the mails for this? > People are accessing their (IMAP-)inboxes from

[Dovecot] Defer emails until the user is ready to deal with them (snooze button / bring-forward file / bring-up file for emails)

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Laif
Hi, I would like to add a feature to my email-client (Thunderbird) which stops emails from showing up until a specific time (e.g. having buttons for: show again this evening, tomorrow, next week, next month ...). As far as I've learned this is not possible with IMAP: - storing the 'do-not-show-unt

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.beta5: dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line X

2010-05-20 Thread Chris Laif
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Chris Laif wrote: > > I'm using dovecot 2.0.beta5 (IMAP and LMTP+sieve) and I'm getting lots > of errors like this: > > Warning: /data/mail/4567/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry > at line 3: 1274182284.M635158P16414.mail,

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.beta5: dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line X

2010-05-18 Thread Chris Laif
Hi, I'm using dovecot 2.0.beta5 (IMAP and LMTP+sieve) and I'm getting lots of errors like this: Warning: /data/mail/4567/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 3: 1274182284.M635158P16414.mail,S=767,W=785:2,S (uid 5 -> 16) All data is stored on local disk (ext3, no NFS!). As this

Re: [Dovecot] How to manage Seen flags via sieve?

2009-05-18 Thread Chris Laif
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Max Ivanov wrote: > I use public namespace for group mailboxes. If someone sends email > from this mailbox , MTA detects it and delivers copy of that message > to mailbox/Sent folder, to keep history of all messages available for > every group member. I'd like to s

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and fake users

2008-08-20 Thread Chris Laif
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Vytenis Sabaliauskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Our company has decided to make a fake POP3 (and possibly IMAP) server, > which accepts any user name and password combination and shows there are no > new messages. This is for the purpose t

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot load balancing

2008-08-01 Thread Chris Laif
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Hummel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:07:28PM +0200, Chris Laif wrote: > >> Do you use dovecot's delivery agent (LDA)? > > As I stated, no. I need the procmail filtering features. > As stated in the o

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot load balancing

2008-07-31 Thread Chris Laif
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Hummel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every friday a message (no attachement, decent size) is sent to all users : in > such circumstances (but only sometimes, not every time : let's say half the > time such a message is sent), the load goes so high that I have

Re: [Dovecot] Deliver mail as 'read'?

2008-07-21 Thread Chris Laif
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Peter Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to be able to deliver certain mail as 'read' from procmail. My > procmail rules call deliver with -m > to directly to inject filtered mail to maildir based directories. > Hi, I've got an related problem: When f

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot CRAM-MD5 & DIGEST-MD5

2008-07-08 Thread Chris Laif
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Proskurin Kirill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Error: auth(default): password([EMAIL PROTECTED],172.16.1.19): Invalid > password format for scheme CRAM-MD5 > > dovecot-ldap.conf: > default_pass_scheme = CRAM-MD5 > Set default_pass_scheme to PLAIN as you store pass

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Chris Laif
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Cor Bosman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just in case I understand you wrong: You're serving 20k concurrent > > users with 1 (one) server? > > Wait, I think I misunderstood you. We do not have just 1 imap server. > We have 30 imap servers (a little overdimensio

Re: [Dovecot] reason to switch to 1.1

2008-04-29 Thread Chris Laif
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Cor Bosman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It may be good to list your hardware, user count, mailbox backend, and > > file system information, as I suppose that this kind of improvement is not > > universal. > > This specific server is a dual core 2.8ghz xeon wi

Re: [Dovecot] CRAM-MD5 Password Generation Algorithm

2008-04-17 Thread Chris Laif
On 4/13/08, Bill Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact, look here: > > http://www.scconsult.com/bill/crampass.pl > > It does have a dependency issue, in that it requires Digest::Perl::MD5. > There's a little mistake in this script. Line 54 should read: if (length $secret > 64) { You can e

Re: [Dovecot] Exim Dovecot Authentication Problem

2008-01-21 Thread Chris Laif
On 1/20/08, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having a hard time figuring out something that is supposed to be easy. > Tryiong to configure Dovecot so that it provides authentication to Exim > for outgoing smtp. Tried different things and getting > > authentication socket protocol error > S

Re: [Dovecot] Spliting Folders for Efficiency

2007-10-12 Thread Chris Laif
On 10/11/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Timo, > > Would there be any sense in giving Dovecot the option to split folders > into multiple subfolders when they reached a specified size (probably > message count) limit? > Many modern file systems offer the possibility to use optim

Re: [Dovecot] Bug in Exim->Dovecot auth

2007-07-27 Thread Chris Laif
On 7/27/07, Chris Laif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > socket. My (excellent) SMTP test tool "swaks" Oups, sorry, of course it is not "my" excellent tool. The tool was written by John Jetmore. Sorry for my bad english. Chris

[Dovecot] Bug in Exim->Dovecot auth

2007-07-27 Thread Chris Laif
Hi. I'm using SMTP auth with Exim authenticating against Dovecot's auth socket. My (excellent) SMTP test tool "swaks" (http://jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks) tries multiple auth mechanismus consecutively which leads to the following message in Dovecot's log file: Error: auth(default): BUG: Authenti

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.1: corrupt index on fresh mailbox, ideas?

2007-07-12 Thread Chris Laif
On 7/12/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 15:18 +0200, Chris Laif wrote: > On 7/10/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 11:45 -0700, Troy Engel wrote: > > > dovecot: Jul 09 09:38:54 Error: IMAP(x

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.1: corrupt index on fresh mailbox, ideas?

2007-07-11 Thread Chris Laif
On 7/10/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 11:45 -0700, Troy Engel wrote: > dovecot: Jul 09 09:38:54 Error: IMAP(xxx): Maildir > /home/x/xxx/Maildir sync: UIDVALIDITY changed (1183406107 -> 1183999134) Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/90ea01bfa

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.1: corrupt index on fresh mailbox, ideas?

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Laif
On 7/10/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: dovecot-uidlist file had UIDVALIDITY 1183406107 (Mon Jul 2 19:55:07 UTC 2007) and index file had UIDVALIDITY 1183999134 (Mon Jul 9 16:38:54 UTC 2007). This also explains the rest of the errors, Dovecot v1.0 doesn't handle very nicely these UI

Re: [Dovecot] Upgrade from 1.00 to 1.0.1

2007-07-08 Thread Chris Laif
On 7/6/07, Jim Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, after my upgrade from 1.0.0 -> 1.0.1, I started getting similar error messages in my mail.err log but no one is complaining so I figure they are harmless. I also upgraded from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1. After the upgrade, I started getting these "UID

[Dovecot] IMAP traffic logging

2007-05-30 Thread Chris Laif
Hi. I wonder if it is possible to log the number of bytes send in response to IMAP commands. Unfortunately there seems to be no config option similar to "pop3_logout_format". Courier writes a log file like this (header/body bytes): imaplogin: DISCONNECTED, ip=[:::10.123.0.234], headers=0, bo

Re: [Dovecot] Disconnected for inactivity in reading our output top=0/0

2007-04-18 Thread Chris Laif
On 4/19/07, Chris Gosley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apr 19 12:51:49 mail dovecot: POP3(vu0095): Disconnected for inactivity in reading our output top=0/0, retr=1/0, del=0/2, size=25266 We have a similiar situation every few weeks. Outlook gets confused by a certain (spam) message in the inbox.

Re: [Dovecot] PHP implementation of dovecotpw passwords

2007-03-20 Thread Chris Laif
On 3/19/07, Frank Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am looking for PHP functions that implement passwords that much the dovecotpw implementation. I downloaded one from PEAR, Crypt_HMAC, but the passwords it generates look nothing like the dovecotpw passwords, which could be my fault because I