Pekka Savola píše v Po 04. 08. 2008 v 12:40 +0300:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> It doesn't seem to be that the current logic is working; there is no
> >> program with the PID that's in master.pid, and dovecot (1.0.7 + RHEL
> >> patches) refuses to start.
> >>
> >> root: /root
Hi,
I have a little problem with defining the right permissions for
dovecot.conf. The main problem is that the password for SSL certificates
is stored there and the conf file is world readable by default, which
makes a security problem [1]. It is not a problem to restrict the
permissions to 0600,
Timo Sirainen píše v Pá 27. 06. 2008 v 10:15 +0300:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:11 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > v1.1 changed, because using the same socket for IPv4 and IPv6 caused the
> >
> > The change is <http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/da971cec0395>
>
Timo Sirainen píše v Pá 27. 06. 2008 v 09:43 +0300:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 07:35 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Kenneth Porter píše v Čt 26. 06. 2008 v 16:24 -0700:
> > > I just installed the Rawhide package on my CentOS 5 system. The one item
> > > that bit me is that
Kenneth Porter píše v Čt 26. 06. 2008 v 16:24 -0700:
> I just installed the Rawhide package on my CentOS 5 system. The one item
> that bit me is that the config file defaults to using interface "[::]" so
> it only listens on IPv6. (This is from a patch in the package that changes
> the upstream
Kaushal Gandhi píše v Čt 26. 06. 2008 v 12:00 +0530:
> I have tried to installed dovecot 1.0.15 on Centos 4.6
> ./configure --with-pam
> make
> make install
>
> It got installed without error
>
> However when I do
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# service dovecot start
> dovecot: unrecognized service
You
Timo Sirainen píše v St 18. 06. 2008 v 12:38 +0300:
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 09:35 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > this issue was discussed here twice in the not so far history
> > (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-January/028317.html,
> > http://www.dovecot.org/list/
Hi,
this issue was discussed here twice in the not so far history
(http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-January/028317.html,
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-February/029147.html), but I
need to open it again as it makes problems for our users on one side and
on the other side we don't
Charles Marcus píše v Pá 13. 06. 2008 v 13:16 -0400:
> On 6/13/2008, Dan Horák ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away), you
> > will get 1.0.7, the same as is in RHEL 5.2.
>
> I would *never* use any OS/distro that
Charles Marcus píše v Pá 13. 06. 2008 v 11:50 -0400:
> On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > ./dovecote --version returns "1.0.rc15"
>
> Upgrade... then we'll talk...
>
> rc15 is just too old and buggy...
>
When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away),
Just for info - release 1.1.rc10 builds successfully on Fedora Rawhide
on all 4 architectures.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=660479
Dan
--
Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer
Timo Sirainen píše v Po 02. 06. 2008 v 21:50 +0300:
> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:49 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have gone through the patches that are used in the Fedora package and
> > probably only the "mkcert-permissions" [1] can be consider
Hi,
I have gone through the patches that are used in the Fedora package and
probably only the "mkcert-permissions" [1] can be considered to be
included upstream. It is dated into package version 1.0-0.beta2.3, but I
cannot find any particular reason for the inclusion (like a bug in
bugzilla, etc.)
Diego Liziero píše v Čt 29. 05. 2008 v 19:49 +0200:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:48 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am the new maintainer of dovecot for Fedora and Red Hat and so I am
> > trying to cleanup some old reported bugs.
> > [..]
>
>
Hello,
I am the new maintainer of dovecot for Fedora and Red Hat and so I am
trying to cleanup some old reported bugs. One of them is a problem when
"deliver" writes of temporary files into /tmp are blocked by SELinux
policy (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424091). From the
SELinux's
15 matches
Mail list logo
