Re: Sieve: adding Date: header when missing

2014-07-17 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 17/07/2014 16:50, Reindl Harald wrote: > as said: > fix the application or try to solve that at MTA level If it were so simple to convince people to fix their applications (I especially hate applications refusing the "+" character in email address local part), the world would definitely be a be

Re: Sieve: adding Date: header when missing

2014-07-17 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 17/07/2014 16:51, Alex JOST wrote: > Am 17.07.2014 16:13, schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: >> Hello, >> >> there is a way with a sieve rule to add a Date: header when it is >> missing? Adding one with the time of reception of the message or using >> the date from the

Re: Sieve: adding Date: header when missing

2014-07-17 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 17/07/2014 17:34, Jiri Bourek wrote: > On 17.7.2014 16:40, Jochen Bern wrote: >> On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >>> Unfortunately I'm receiving some useful automated messages that lack a >>> Date header and this screws up the sorting in my imap

Re: Sieve: adding Date: header when missing

2014-07-17 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello Harald, On 17/07/2014 16:30, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 17.07.2014 16:13, schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: >> there is a way with a sieve rule to add a Date: header when it is >> missing? Adding one with the time of reception of the message or using >> the date fro

Sieve: adding Date: header when missing

2014-07-17 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello, there is a way with a sieve rule to add a Date: header when it is missing? Adding one with the time of reception of the message or using the date from the the first Received: header would be good options. Unfortunately I'm receiving some useful automated messages that lack a Date header a

Re: [Dovecot] OT: Large corporate email systems - Exchange vs open source *nix based

2013-12-11 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 11/12/2013 11:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Management > should never allow the company to be held hostage, have no options, due > to being reliant on a single systems administrator and his/er unique > knowledge of the infrastructure. Indeed, it is much better to be held hostage of a huge corpora

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot MTA

2013-11-10 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 08/11/2013 14:07, Timo Sirainen wrote: > I've never really wanted to create my own MTA, because I like Postfix > quite a lot. And I always thought it would require a horribly lot of > time to be able to create something that was anywhere even close to > having Postfix's features. Hello Timo, I

Re: [Dovecot] Best way from Mbox to Maildir using 2.17?

2013-11-05 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 05/11/2013 23:39, Noel Butler wrote: > On 05/11/2013 22:04, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >> On 05/11/2013 12:24, Noel Butler wrote: >>> On 05/11/2013 20:11, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >>>> On 05/11/2013 11:04, Noel Butler wrote: >>> >>>>> >&

Re: [Dovecot] Best way from Mbox to Maildir using 2.17?

2013-11-05 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 05/11/2013 12:24, Noel Butler wrote: > On 05/11/2013 20:11, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >> On 05/11/2013 11:04, Noel Butler wrote: > >>> >>> but using system users, you wouldnt use dovecot's LDA :) >> >> Why not? >> > > pure overkill, yo

Re: [Dovecot] Best way from Mbox to Maildir using 2.17?

2013-11-05 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 05/11/2013 11:04, Noel Butler wrote: > On 05/11/2013 19:44, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 19:29 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: >> [...] >>> think in postfix home_mailbox = Maildir/ will do it, with sendmail >>> its >>> much more tricky and your best sticking with mbox, if exim,