Timo
I have for two days try to unsubscribe from this list using email mailman.
The list server does not send me confirmation request.
Please fix your server and remove me
You are reporting a problem with a antique?
Please try current stable version and if problem persist let us know
with include the dovecot -n output.
Current version is 2.2.18, pretty pointless trying to look for a bug
resolution in such a old version, also, 2.1.9 maybe latest in your
distribution
On 4/28/15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2015, at 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Apr 2015, at 04:15, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>>> When can we expect 2.2.17 to resolve this?
>>
>> As far as I know this doesn't affect any of the major distri
When can we expect 2.2.17 to resolve this?
On 4/14/15, J. Echter wrote:
> Am 14.04.2015 um 15:28 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
>> Should not need to alter flags, eg:
>> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
>> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
>> -f ${send
On 4/14/15, J. Echter wrote:
> Am 14.04.2015 um 14:04 schrieb J. Echter:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're using thunderbird as our client, it has the functionality to
>> sort spamassassin tagged mails in a folder called 'Junk'.
>>
>> I have this folder on my dovecot server and i'd like to use the
>> recipient_d
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
*long-term* benefits o
On 12/26/14, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2014 3:15 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>>
>> your Gentoo is nice in a small environment
>>
>> on larger setups someone is using binary packages and can setup his own
> repo with overrides while maintain *testable* setups
>>
>
> Just to point out, it i
OK thank you
On 11/17/14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2014, at 02:44, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>
>> Is possible with dovecot?
>>
>> Legal department have told us we need to stop anyone from delete email
>> on corporate mail server, so nobody, even managers can
Is possible with dovecot?
Legal department have told us we need to stop anyone from delete email
on corporate mail server, so nobody, even managers can not anymore
delete any mail?
On 9/13/14, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 9/12/14, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>> On 9/12/14, Nick Edwards wrote:
>>> On 9/11/14, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>>>> Halo,
>>>>
>>>> Has anyones had experiences with feeding usenet into imap folders, we
>&
On 9/13/14, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 06:33 AM, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>>> Depending on your news feed that will get huge over time, and if you
>>> try get a back feed of existing posts, thats even crazier, my upstream
>>> feeds me over FORTY THOUSAND text
On 9/12/14, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 9/11/14, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>> Halo,
>>
>> Has anyones had experiences with feeding usenet into imap folders, we
>> like to have some group for all user, any problem with message limit?
>> We only want the te
Halo,
Has anyones had experiences with feeding usenet into imap folders, we
like to have some group for all user, any problem with message limit?
We only want the text newsgroups?
Halo,
This might seem like another indirect thread.
I Monday started new job, first task must replace courier. The job use
POP3. and IMAP only for webmail, but must server support 4K POP3 at one
times. I see from similar thread current settings not adequate , we will
use TLS and if wiki read right
2.2.9 release
but point of post is I cannot reach dovecot website we has a route fault to
it
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Hi Edwardo,
>
> Which file or URL are you looking for?
>
> Try one of these:
> http://www.dovecot.org/download.html
> http://www.dovecot.org/rele
Halo,
Is mirror to get 2.2.9?
cannot get dovecot.org, this time out
4 xe-0-1-0-1-3664.r00.saplbr01.br.bb.gin.ntt.net (200.15.0.45) 6.946 ms
7.093 ms 6.899 ms
5 xe-4-1-3.r20.miamfl02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.217) 118.130 ms
118.111 ms 118.117 ms
6 ae-1.r05.miamfl02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
Halo Nick,
Yes agree Riendl has sent me direct foul mouth abuse from this list, I have
my staff now enabling this blacklist too.
He filtered out now on lists too, wont see him bullying potty mouth again
good ridden
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> *yawn*
> you just dont
: SHA1
>
>
>
> Am 11.11.2013 06:24, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> > My company have 36 dovecots, one biggest ISP in country 3 million
> > user, agree with Nick poster, we had stop use dovecot load balance
> > because too bad effect on primary database, now use single
>
My company have 36 dovecots, one biggest ISP in country 3 million user,
agree with Nick poster, we had stop use dovecot load balance because too
bad effect on primary database, now use single localhost, we have script
run every 30 second to test login, if fail sleep 30 second, try again, fail
and
I agree completely, I for one am also very sick of Harald's venomous
rhetoric on this list. I am surprised that a moderator has not banned
Harald or officially warned him.
I am not one for such language, but I spent only five minutes googling
Harald, and I see what you have meant, perhaps as you
We tried one time software solution, not very reliable under load, we move
to coyotepoint equalizer hardware load balancer, very good cost and
excellent reliable
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Romer Ventura wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I've been thinking about the best way to achieve load balancin
It not be because Timo not agree with thiz for switching, if one software
not do what you need, you go look for one that does as other says, my
manager would command that, I expect you manager also command you same.
I have mail from list member who advize me of broken 1.2 version where
thiz work
plans on doing it, he should just say so, so people can look at
> >> complete alternatives, we are a long way passed early 1.2 series.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:33 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> >>
> >>> Edwardo Garcia wrot
What version broken where thiz work like need? Maybe I try.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > Am 24.05.2013 09:52, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> > > But mysql not problemo, it be Dovecot talk
Harald wrote:
>
> Am 24.05.2013 09:52, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> > But mysql not problemo, it be Dovecot talk to both, do not want Dovecot
> to
> > talk to both at same time unless slave (local) copy die
>
> and this mostly for a good resason to support your argument
>
Am 24.05.2013 09:45, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> > Halo,
> >
> > (First time posting, please forgive English is not native)
> >
> > Change from Courier to Dovecot 2.1.16
> >
> > Having two server.
> >
> > Having mysql on thiz two server, one master, one sl
But mysql not problemo, it be Dovecot talk to both, do not want Dovecot to
talk to both at same time unless slave (local) copy die
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Alex Crow wrote:
> On 24/05/13 08:45, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>
>> Halo,
>>
>> (First time posting, pleas
Halo,
(First time posting, please forgive English is not native)
Change from Courier to Dovecot 2.1.16
Having two server.
Having mysql on thiz two server, one master, one slave.
What we wish is slave Dovecot only ask slave mysql, unless slave mysql not
work when then ask master, we have Postfi
29 matches
Mail list logo
