a warning, but delete if the files are otherwise identical.
Would this be easy to change? It solves this problem, although perhaps not in
the most efficient way...
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam
or something to make sure you don't end up with
multiple rsync jobs running at the same time...
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
could use imapsync instead: http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync/
It synchronizes two IMAP mailboxes (including message flags etc) independent
of the underlying implementation.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100
.
Same for Roundcube, btw.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
pair. Beyond that, it's really a protocol problem...
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
-ci-AVs-mieci
No, this is exactly what the client passes to Dovecot. The IMAP standard
allows only plain ASCII in foldernames and therefor uses a modified UTF-7
encoding for non-ASCII characters. See section 5.1.3 of RFC 3501.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP
?
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
to setup separate dovecot instances.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
. :-)
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
pgpWWdOzwMxoh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the GUIDs are the maildir base filenames, which contain
host names. Is it a bad idea to expose them to users?
Why? Users can see hostnames in eg. Received headers as well?
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled
).
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
, recipients
SHOULD be able to specify a set of addresses to the responder
which it will recognize as valid for that recipient.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
It's RFC recommended practice, see RFC 3834:
I know. Just for this I re-calcalculated my email address stats.
There is a SHOULD two times. I have replied on this somewhen in the past
package.
See also http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-August/024504.html which
enabled pkgsrc to build the dovecot-sieve plugin (the old one) against an
installed dovecot instance with only liblib.a installed additionally.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP
time, which should result in faster
logins when you have a lot of new mail.
And Dovecot's LDA has extra functionality, most notably Sieve support.
But if you don't use all that, Postfix' LDA works fine too.
Geert
--
Geert Hendrickx -=- g...@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:24:05PM -0600, Romer Ventura wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering is I could use MySQL as storage only..? Meaning that no
user information, other than the obvious email address associated with an
specific email so that each email can be showed to the right user, will
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:44:21AM +0200, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Yes, I agree that it should be in UTF-8. My specific problem is that about
80% (a rough estimate) of our users are on either Windows or webmail. Those
having passwords containing umlauts etc can log on, using their current
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:54:48PM +0200, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Thanks for the info, a setup like this is what I opted for eventually. I
added a note to that wiki page that the query also needs to return the
nopassword -field for Dovecot 1.1+ to accept the NULL password:
Ok, good catch (I
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 05:51:05PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Nov 18, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Is there a setting that forces the authentication daemon to
convert the provided password to a specific charset before the
comparison takes place, or how should one handle
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:03:04PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:26 +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
It seems like this is a limitation in the IMAP protocol. From RFC 3501:
I remember reading something about using UTF-8 and stringprep in
authentication strings, probably
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:00:00PM +0200, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Yes, I see. So in light of this and the conversation on the imap-protocol
-list
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/2008-February/000822.html
our current options seem to boil down to having the
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 08:49:22PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig
This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to
dovecot-news list. Next
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of the
time) instead of creating tons of short-lived connections that ask the
same stuff over and
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 07:36:44PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 7:31 PM, Amitai Schlair wrote:
Jun 24 12:22:13 chicken-ac dovecot: Panic: IMAP(schmonz): file
maildir-uidlist.c: line 1217 (maildir_uidlist_sync_update):
assertion failed: (ctx-first_unwritten_pos !=
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:37:30PM -0700, Peter Hessler wrote:
I 3 mutt. Easy enough, but lots of power is available.
Yes, mutt is great! :-)
Btw, you can use mutt with dovecot without running dovecot as a daemon/server,
by putting this in your .muttrc:
set tunnel=MAIL=/home/geert/mbox
FWIW, pkgsrc users can find an up-to-date dovecot 1.1 package in
pkgsrc-wip:
http://pkgsrc.se/wip/dovecot
http://pkgsrc.se/wip/dovecot-sieve
Geert
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Geoffroy DESVERNAY wrote:
I did (re-)compile dovecot (1.1rc8) today, with managesieve (0.10.2)
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:27:32AM +0200, Jost Krieger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:11:33AM +0100, Ed W wrote:
Could do, but I was trying to expand to the case that the headers were
different, but the body was the same (eg I suspect that mailing list
managers might deliver emails
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:16:55PM -0400, webbie wrote:
I got a compile error with rc6, rc5 works fine.
Exactly the same on NetBSD:
mail-index-write.c: In function `mail_index_write':
mail-index-write.c:179: error: structure has no member named `st_ctim'
mail-index-write.c:179: error:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:01:30PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Whops, I guess I'll make a rc7 release later today for you BSD people.
For now these patches help (messed up the first one):
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/0d842b055838
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/5766890f1275
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:42:10AM +0200, Cor Bosman wrote:
Actually..it's 2 NetApp 6070s. But those are not just simple servers.
They are very expensive, dedicated NFS boxes each taking up a full rack
doing multiple terrabytes each, connected with multiple gbit links.
It's 99.99% maildir,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:49:43AM +0200, Cor Bosman wrote:
How large are the (individual) mailboxes you're hosting there?
Most of them are max 500MB, but average use is much less. It's a little
difficult to calculate because almost all POP users empty their mailbox.
We did some reports a
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:00:30PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
Geoffroy Desvernay wrote:
For those who wants testing 1.1rc3 on FreeBSD, this is a simple patch
against /usr/ports/mail/dovecot.
To apply:
# cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
# patch -p1 /tmp/patch_dovecot_1.0.13-1.1.rc3.diff
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:36:01PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
There are some clever tricks on that page to keep the LDAP/SQL database
Dovecot-agnostic and putting the logic in the query. Do you know a similar
trick for allow_nets; I have users stored in a PgSQL database and want to
allow
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 06:17:51PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:12 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote:
Is it possible to deny a user on POP or IMAP! For example, on the
primary server we use POP3 and IMAP but how I can force a user to use
POP3 and be unable to
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:11:52AM -0600, Tim Tyler wrote:
Dovecot experts,
Does Dovecot support ldaps:\\ connections in dovecot-ldap.conf for
ldap connections? I can get regular ldap:\\connections to work,
but not ldaps:\\ connections. I have even downloaded the latest
beta
Hi Timo,
may I request once more to consider the attached patch for dovecot
1.1, it enables the sieve plugin (incl. sievec and sieved, needed
for pysieved) to be built against an installed dovecot package, if
--enable-header-install additionally installs the liblib.a library
in the same directory
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 12:38:12AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Somehow I doubt there are any Dovecot setups left that unknowingly have
this problem, but it still counts as a security hole. The possibility to
cause this problem exists in Dovecot v1.0.rc11 and later.
[...]
You can fix this
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:17:22PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Deliver / LMTP server
-
Currently deliver parses dovecot.conf using its own parser. This has
caused all kinds of problems. v2.0's master rewrite helps with this,
because deliver can then just ask the
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 11:32:09PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta2.tar.gz.sig
Several bug/crashfixes. deliver now supports -a parameter (see
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA) which
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:40:58AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:24 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
But I have a segfault with deliver+sieve. I took the Sieve vacation
example from the Wiki and removed the fileinto/stop part so it reaches
vacation:
With Sieve plugin
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 04:55:40PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta1.tar.gz.sig
1.1beta1 builds and runs fine on NetBSD, and I've added dovecot 1.1beta1
and dovecot-sieve 1.1.0
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:58:03PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
I guess this'll do it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/92bce6a3fdad
(without testing) No, the filename is wrong. The generated rquota_xdr.c
has #include
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:16:22PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.9.2007, at 17.54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
- I still need to run make rquota_xdr.c manually, but only the
first time.
If I rm rquota_xdr.c and rquota.h and run make again, the are
generated.
Well, I can't really think
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:59:07AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 20:07 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
- src/plugin/quota: *BSD rpcgen doesn't copy rquota.h when called with -c.
The Makefile should either: cp the file as part of the rquota_xdr.c
Makefile
target
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:41:38AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:23 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
- apparantly the rquota_xdr.c target is not called automatically.
?
I have to run make rquota_xdr.c manually, make all doesn't invoke it.
Maybe this will do
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:36:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 20:22 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
In dovecot 1.1.x, ~ is apparantly not always expanded to the homedir
anymore. I used to have this in my 1.0 configuration file:
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:29:42AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:23 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:59:07AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 20:07 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
- src/plugin/quota: *BSD rpcgen doesn't copy
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:07:02PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha6.tar.gz.sig
There are a few problems building this on NetBSD:
- src/master: master-settings.c requires
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:07:02PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha6.tar.gz.sig
Most importantly doesn't crash anymore if both pop3 and imap aren't
used. :) I'm hoping people
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:24:08PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Deliver + sieve is working great. By setting the sieve variable to
sieve, a non-hidden file, it doesn't appear in the folder list. I made
a similar change to pysieved to use a non-hidden folder - in combination
with avelsieve
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:34:23AM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
What is the format of your global setting? I tried -
plugin {
sieve = /var/mail/%d/%u
}
since my mail dirs are stored under /var/mail/domain/username. Does
that search for .dovecot.sieve in the specified folder? Or do
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:06:37AM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
This patch still includes (yet another) instance of the CMU Sieve source,
as explained in one of my previous e-mails.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Considering the dovecot-sieve plugin, I noticed
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:43:08PM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Unless you or Timo have strong arguments to the opposite, I currently
have no plans to change the current connection of sieve to the
managesieve patch until dovecot(-sieve) 2.0.
Ok. I just thought you wanted to get rid of the
Timo,
would you be interested in implementing an LMTP interface for deliver?
That would make Dovecot a stand-alone mailstore server, no local MTA
required.
Geert
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:31:53PM +0200, FORMER 03|Baltasar Cevc wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up our new mail system using
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 06:06:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So Dovecot remembers what fields client is interested of and when header
is being parsed it caches everything that it knows the client wants.
For how long does dovecot remember which headers? e.g. what happens if a
user switches to
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Tom Vajzovic wrote:
Hi all
I'm using dovecot 1.0.rc15 to serve a maildir by IMAP.
I have an IMAP subdirectory called subscriptions. The messages are in
maidir/.subscriptions/cur/ etc.
Dovecot is renaming the directory .subscriptions/ to
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:20:02PM +0200, FORMER 03|Baltasar Cevc wrote:
But I'd need some possibility to have two different IMAP listeners (e.g.
one on port 144 for webmail) or something similar, as I currently
disallow webmail (which connects to localhost via IMAP), too.
You just need to
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:53:52AM -0700, Don Russell wrote:
Not sure what your situation is, but in the USA laws are underway for
requiring corporations to keep ALL e-mail ... not sure what the state of
those laws are maybe they won't materialize but obviously people
are thinking
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:35:59AM -0400, Dave Morrow wrote:
While everything seems to have gone right, I have been unable to
successfully login to the IMAP server using Outlook Express.
It seems that the problem may relate to PostfixAdmin storing passwords in
the mysql database md5
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:03:30PM -0400, Bill Boebel wrote:
Do you think it's a good solution to use one synchronised local Openldap on
each
server Dovecot ?
No. I'd replicate your ldap database on a few servers that are dedicated
to that purpose, and on each mail server use Dovecot's
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:33:01PM +0200, jalal wrote:
if i want to change the dovecot-sieve file to modify the rules (or even
let my users do it at some point) then it has to been done by root.
Is there a way to setup the sieve plugin so a user can create his own
rules? sort of like
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:22:59PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig
No dovecot-sieve-1.0.3 tarball (yet)?
Geert
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:41:44PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
1.0.2 works just fine with it. The version numbers just have happened to
be the same earlier.
Is this documented somewhere? Or how do we know which dovecot-sieve
version matches which dovecot version(s)? I thought they always had
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:02:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Or I guess since this hasn't been a problem normally I could just remove
it unless it becomes a common problem. Updated the text:
Use --with-dovecot=path to point to dovecot-config file's directory.
There are two possibilities
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:52:18AM -0400, Tom Diehl wrote:
I do not know what OS you are packaging for but if you are looking for
rpms, fedora has released rpms that include seive in the same srpm as
dovecot. I took their .src.rpm and rebuilt it on EL4/Centos4 and it spit
out seperate dovecot
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:02:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
sievec and sieved binaries are built only if you use 2) method, because
they need to link with Dovecot's libraries. They can be used to compile and
decompile Sieve scripts. You probably don't need these.
According to the Makefile,
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:50:11AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Keep in mind that one of the reasons people buy Exchange is because
Exchange does things that people want. A calendar is one of many
examples. But to start with I'm thinking more in terms of controlling
server side email settings.
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:04:11PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes, there were some problems with it. I think it should work now once
DNS caches expire (max. 20h). Although I don't get it why the A record
doesn't disappear from .org root servers. But looks like it doesn't
cause problems
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:19:15PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote the following on 5/20/2007 1:45 PM -0800:
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 22:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So, beginning the move by shutting down Postfix and Mailman..
Wonder if it's working. Wonder what
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:19:36PM +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
I tried to add the line
allow_nets=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.0.0/16
in the block
passdb pam {
which is the default enabled auth code in Debian.
allow_nets is a passdb field (for example in an SQL passdb), not a
dovecot.conf
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:04:23PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready.
Good job, Timo! Congratulations with the very solid 1.0 release.
It's in
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:47:30PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
HI Timo,
you added the wiki in txt format to the docs dir,
this again brokes my suse spec *g
What annoys me more (as dovecot maintainer for pkgsrc) is that the example
config file changes with (almost) every release. The
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:35:09PM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
What part of Release Candidate isn't clear here... ;-)
release candidate equals latest supported release in this case as well.
If they were 2.0 rc's, I'd continue running the latest 1.whatever release
until done.
Geert
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 07:35:40PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I hate how badly the configuration file updating works everywhere (well,
or at least in Debian). If the changes don't really change any existing
settings and won't conflict with the modified parts of the config file,
there's no
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:30:24AM +0200, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:05:13AM +0300, Timo Sirainen (TS) wrote:
TS
TS I don't think packaging is going to be that big of a problem. If the
packagers
TS can't handle that, then just don't package it. Development versions don't
77 matches
Mail list logo
