Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan van den Berg Verzonden: donderdag 11 september 2008 21:53 Aan: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers I can get those files next Monday without

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

I can get those files next Monday without problem and compare them. So I will get back to that. I also posted some part of the rawlog earlier in the thread; dont know if it of any use Thanks, Jan - Original Message - From: "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: &

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

I can get those files next Monday without problem and compare them. So I will get back to that. I also posted some part of the rawlog earlier in the thread; dont know if it of any use Thanks, Jan - Original Message - From: "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: &

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

I can get those files next Monday without problem and compare them. So I will get back to that. I also posted some part of the rawlog earlier in the thread; dont know if it of any use Thanks, Jan - Original Message - From: "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: &

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jan van den Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'Dovecot Mailing List'" Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 9:11 PM Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

file: but should I be worried and what is it? Cheers, Jan - Original Message - From: "Jan van den Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Dovecot Mailing List'" Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:57 AM Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird I

Re: [Dovecot] error in 1.1.2

I've been following this thread: the bug is related with copying mail across NFS in combination with cache locking, right? Cor uses FBSD; but is this a bug that might impact other platforms as well? Cheers, Jan - Original Message - From: "Cor Bosman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers

o Sirainen Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 20:45 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: 'Dovecot Mailing List' Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew headers On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 10:29 +0200, Jan van den Berg wrote: > We run 1.1.3 and I use Outlook to conne

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting newheaders

Hi, Well I enabled verbose debugs and all but there isn't anything interesting in those logs... Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Patrick Nagel Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 12:17 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: &#x

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting newheaders

m not sure what to look for in these files. Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan van den Berg Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 11:23 Aan: 'Dovecot Mailing List' CC: 'Patrick Nagel' Onderwerp: Re: [

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting new headers

v. to debug. Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Patrick Nagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 11:01 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: 'Dovecot Mailing List' Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting new headers -B

[Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting new headers

Hi, We run 1.1.3 and I use Outlook to connect to my IMAP box and a couple of times per day (randomly) when I click certain folders IMAP will start retrieving ALL headers for that folder again ('retrieving new headers')! I don't understand this. What triggers IMAP to do so, why not just retriev

Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build

/2008, Jan van den Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 2. I have set a quota limit of 10MB and (extra) 8MB on the Trash > folder. ? Why on earth would you set such ridiculously low quotas? -- Best regards, Charles

Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build

-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan van den Berg Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 16:36 Aan: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build Ok so basically I have two problems: 1. I dont understand why the

Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build

quota. Or is it the SM implementation that is wrong and are there any workarounds available? Cheers, Jan -----Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jan van den Berg Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 14:53 Aan: Jan van den Berg; Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: RE: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)

Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build

Of course the rule is wrong: ":ignore=Spam\ e\-mail" shouldn't be in there. I fixed it. But still; why isn't the maildirsize being recreated when it's not there? Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens J

Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build

ka-05): Quota root QUOTA: Invalid rule: maildir:storage=10M:ignore=Spam e-mail Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan van den Berg Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 13:40 Aan: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: [Dovecot] Maildi

[Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build

Hi, Im testing with 1.1RC1. I read here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Maildir "If you configure quota limits in Dovecot (e.g. quota=maildir:storage=102400(kilobytes)), Dovecot makes sure that this header is kept up to date. If the file does not exist, it's simply rebuilt." This is my query: p

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 marks email for deletion

in strace? Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Maarten Bezemer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 4 maart 2008 13:45 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 marks email for deletion Hi Jan, On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Jan van den Berg

[Dovecot] Outlook 2003 marks email for deletion

Hi, Im running Dovecot 1.1RC1 (only IMAP). I noticed that when I connect with Outlook 2003; and I start reading new email some mails get marked (completely random) for deletion (,S -> ,ST) ?? I can set this mail to unread, undo the deletion read it again and it will stay OK. But other ema

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration

uirrelMail as webmail app. Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Charles Marcus Verzonden: vrijdag 29 februari 2008 11:41 Aan: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration Jan van den Berg, on

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration

FYI, We deployed Dovecot 1.1RC1 yesterday on about 100k+ mailboxes (on multiple frontends which connect to a storage via NFS). We handle about one IMAP login every second (for now only from our webmail app). So far; it's been running like a charm; we come from Courier IMAP and Dovecot IMAP (with i

Re: [Dovecot] Auth_cache not working?

Aha ok! I can see the cache hits and misses now: so that's fine. But I will just keep using my imapproxy to reduce I/O. Thanks Timo. Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 27 februari 2008 17:38 Aan: Jan van den Be

[Dovecot] Auth_cache not working?

Hi, I have: auth_cache_size = 4096 auth_cache_ttl = 3600 I use Thunderbird connecting to my Dovecot IMAP server 1.1rc1. I click on five folders and close Thunderbird. This is my log: dovecot: Feb 27 17:26:56 Info: Dovecot v1.1.rc1 starting up dovecot: Feb 27 17:26:56 Info: auth-work

Re: [Dovecot] Multiple password schemes

onden: dinsdag 26 februari 2008 14:02 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Multiple password schemes On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:27 +0100, Jan van den Berg wrote: > This works; however I noticed because of history a lot of my users still > have a CRYPT password (not

[Dovecot] Multiple password schemes

Hi, right now I have default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT in my dovecot-sql-auth.conf file. This works; however I noticed because of history a lot of my users still have a CRYPT password (not a MD5-CRYPT password). Now I get these errors: dovecot: Feb 26 13:08:17 Info: auth-worker(d

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1rc1: Maximum number of mail processes exceeded

Before you start Dovecot type this in you shell: ulimit -n 65000 I don't know how the use of the 'unlimited' word works: maybe this is only 1024? Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Ralf Hildebrandt Verzonden: maandag 25 febru

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability

ts with regards to forking and threading of the deliver binary? Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Gabriel Millerd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zaterdag 23 februari 2008 4:01 Aan: Jan van den Berg Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:5

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability

Thanks for the detailed answer (it helps)! Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 22 februari 2008 12:36 Aan: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability > Hi, > > So yo

[Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability

Hi, I just finished setting up a functional design with Dovecot+Sieve and it works like a charm. However I'm having serious doubts about the scalability of this. Here is part of a discussion we're having here: About Dovecot+Sieve. What happens here is that your MTA is configured to pass _

Re: [Dovecot] sieve dues not work

# Enable mail process debugging. This can help you figure out why Dovecot # isn't finding your mails. mail_debug = yes Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Carsten Henkel Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2008 20:49 Aan: dovecot@doveco

Re: [Dovecot] PAM libraries not found

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan van den Berg Verzonden: vrijdag 15 februari 2008 11:32 Aan: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: [Dovecot] PAM libraries not found When I add the --with-pam option in my configure command I get the following error: checking for pam_start in -lpam... no configure

Re: [Dovecot] PAM libraries not found

rspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Ralf Hildebrandt Verzonden: vrijdag 15 februari 2008 11:47 Aan: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] PAM libraries not found * Jan van den Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When I add the --with-pam option in m

[Dovecot] PAM libraries not found

When I add the --with-pam option in my configure command I get the following error: checking for pam_start in -lpam... no configure: error: Can't build with PAM support: libpam not found PAM is most certainly installed on the machine: ii libpam-modules0.79-5 Pluggab

Re: [Dovecot] Postfix, dovecot and sieve - no response from sieve

Herve probably uses the default Etch package. I don't know who maintains the package: but it certainly is old. Regards, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Charles Marcus Verzonden: dinsdag 12 februari 2008 13:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC:

Re: [Dovecot] Expected size of index-files?

Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2008 17:58 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Expected size of index-files? On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 17:45 +0100, Jan van den Berg wrote: > I'm scared to use (index) files that go sort of unnotic

Re: [Dovecot] Expected size of index-files?

o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2008 17:33 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: Dovecot Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Expected size of index-files? On Feb 8, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Jan van den Berg wrote: > That's actually quite a lot. > Consider you run 100k+ mailboxes (1GB e

Re: [Dovecot] Expected size of index-files?

That's actually quite a lot. Consider you run 100k+ mailboxes (1GB each) and you would move to Dovecot this will be a huge chunk out of your storage. Is using dovecot index files really that much faster than running ":INDEX=MEMORY" ? Where could I find some benchmarks about this? Cheers, Jan ---

Re: [Dovecot] Switch from courier to dovecot

Out of curiosity how did you handle the courierimapsubscribed and courierimapuiddb file name differences? Did you just rename them? Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Richard G Riley Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2008 13:30 Aan:

Re: [Dovecot] Mixed Courier POP3 and Dovecot IMAP environment

art afresh with Dovecot. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zondag 30 september 2007 14:08 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Mixed Courier POP3 and Dovecot IMAP environment On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 13:29 +02

Re: [Dovecot] Mixed Courier POP3 and Dovecot IMAP environment

using a proxy can be of help too; could you give some pointers/url on how to set up this proxy? Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ed W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 28 september 2007 14:06 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Mixed Courier P

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1 Beta 1 Works!

It's the file descriptors limit you can set/change this with ulimit -n x. Also check the ulimit entry in man bash. Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Luciano Mannucci Verzonden: dinsdag 25 september 2007 10:34 Aan: dovecot@dovec

[Dovecot] Mixed Courier POP3 and Dovecot IMAP environment

Hi, Currently we support Courier POP and IMAP for all our users (users can use IMAP as well as POP at the same time). We are thinking about moving to Dovecot; but first moving away from Courier IMAP to Dovecot IMAP (and maybe later also move to Dovecot POP). This would create a mixed environm

Re: [Dovecot] Courier migrating issues: indexes, maildirsize, update query

onkelijk bericht- Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 23 mei 2007 15:33 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Courier migrating issues: indexes, maildirsize,update query On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:36 +0200, Jan van den Berg wrote:

Re: [Dovecot] Courier migrating issues: indexes, maildirsize, update query

t.index.cache.lock", "/var/spool/mail/r/o/roka-05/dovecot.index.cache") = 0 Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 23 mei 2007 13:39 Aan: Jan van den Berg CC: dovecot@dovecot.org Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Cour

[Dovecot] Courier migrating issues: indexes, maildirsize, update query

Hi, (my first post to the list) I'm in the process of testing Dovecot to see whether it meets our needs to replace our current Courier setup which serves well over 100.000 mailboxes (pop3 and imap: mysql with NFS) So far dovecot seems pretty straight forward; however I ran into a couple of thing