On 2014-07-02 15:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:01, schrieb ihab:
i using roundcube with dovecot, i have a question if there is
possible to
know the number of users that using the mail system (in other word
the
online users)
no - how do you imagine that?
* roundcube is a
On 2014-07-02 15:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:10, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
On 2014-07-02 15:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:01, schrieb ihab:
i using roundcube with dovecot, i have a question if there is
possible to
know the number of users that using the mail
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Don't mean to start a flame war, but your statement above is just simply
inaccurate. The main difference between a virtual server and a physical
server is that
On 28/06/2011 02:21, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Don't mean to start a flame war, but your statement above is just
simply inaccurate. The main difference between
On 14/01/11 20:07, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Patrick Westenberg p...@wk-serv.de:
just to get it right:
DRBD for shared storage replication is OK?
Yes, but only if done correctly. ;) There is some concern on Stan's part
(and mime) that you might do it wrong (e.g., in a vm guest rather
On 14/01/11 19:00, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 4:17 PM:
Regarding the servers, I was thinking of having a 2 node drbd cluster (in
active+standby), which would export a single iSCSI LUN. Then, I would have a 2
node dovecot+postfix cluster (in active-active
On 15/01/11 00:59, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 01/14/2011 03:58 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 14/01/11 19:00, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 4:17 PM:
Regarding the servers, I was thinking of having a 2 node drbd cluster
(in
active+standby), which would export
On 15/01/11 01:14, Brad Davidson wrote:
-Original Message-
I'm sorry I don't follow this. It would be appreciated if you could
include a simpler example. The way I see it, a VM disk is just a
small
chunck LVM LV in my case of a real disk.
Perhaps if you were to compare and contrast
On 13/01/11 10:57, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery, along with
Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp (afaik), only
On 13/01/11 10:57, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery,
along with
Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp
(afaik), only
On 13/01/11 21:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:11 AM:
Would DRBD + GFS2 work better than NFS? While NFS is simple, I don't mind
experimenting with DRBD and GFS2 is it means fewer problems?
Depends on your definition of better. If you do two dovecot+drbd
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous!
Yes, recommended. That is what I do on all my clusters.
How do you bond the
Does gfs2 guarantee integridy withou anm fency device ?
You make a fair point. Would I need any hardware fencing for DRBD (and
GFS2)?
On 14/01/11 03:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.com:
for drbd you only need a heartbeat i guess.
Fencing is not needed for drbd, though recommended.
But to use gfs2 you need fence device, ocfs2 does not require once,
like the
ocfs2 driver takes care, it
On 14/01/11 03:26, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy jon...@abpni.co.uk:
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD
cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous
Hi Everyone,
I wish to create a Postfix/Dovecot active-active cluster (each node will
run Postfix *and* Dovecot), which will obviously have to use central
storage. I'm looking for ideas to see what's the best out there. All of
this will be running on multiple Xen hosts, however I don't think
Hi Everyone,
I wish to run Dovecot on my Front End outbound mail relay, and use
Dovecot purely for authentication purposes. However, each mysql database
for each domain will be on a separate server. Is there a way for dovecot
to authenticate against different databases depending on domain
Hi Everyone,
I wish to run Dovecot on my Front End outbound mail relay, and use
Dovecot purely for authentication purposes. However, each mysql database
for each domain will be on a separate server. Is there a way for dovecot
to authenticate against different databases depending on domain name?
I had a look there, but that doesn't have anything on a domain-by-domain
basis
On 11/01/11 13:31, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases
Is that are you looking for ?
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Tripathy
jon
:
Well, at least it work, it will fail until get the right databases.
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Tripathy
jon...@abpni.co.uk mailto:jon...@abpni.co.uk wrote:
I had a look there, but that doesn't have anything on a
domain-by-domain basis
On 11/01/11 13
Hi Folks,
How scalable is dovecot. Do you think a machine with a dual core 2.8Ghz
processor and 2GB of RAM would do a business with 600 users? This server
will have a 100Mbps link to the net, however it will be access by the
business using a couple of ADSL lines (Roughly 7Mbps each).
This
21 matches
Mail list logo
