On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 27.9.2013, at 16.57, Justin McAleer wrote:
>
> > I am hoping to support encrypted passwords, which I know is generally not
> > allowed in a proxy setup. However, I can return the password in
> clear-text
&g
I am hoping to support encrypted passwords, which I know is generally not
allowed in a proxy setup. However, I can return the password in clear-text
out of the password database, so I was hoping for something similar to the
destuser field.
I have successfully used the master password functionality
Ok, here's the short and sweet version of my dilemma. I have a group of
servers mounting a shared NFS device to hold mail data for many
different domains. Is it worth the load balancing management nightmare
of setting up dedicating smtp, pop, and imap to one server (failing over
to another in t
Henry wrote:
dovecot -n:
# /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
... snip ...
userdb:
driver: static
args: uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/home/vmail/%d/%n allow_all_users=yes
Try adding mail_location=~/ to the args above.
socket:
type: listen
client:
path: /var/spool/postfix/private
Mark Par wrote:
hi,
i'm trying to read the mails of virtual users by setting the value of
mail_location to /mail/virtual/%d/%u/Maildir. however, the %d does
not resolve to the domain. i am using ldap as my passdb and userdb.
what am i missing here?
| May 21 04:32:42 localhost dovecot: auth(d
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much
slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the
conclusions.
Originally I ran the tests with the databases being in XFS filesystem.
MySQL's performance was horrible. It went 3-7x faster wit
Stewart Dean wrote:
can we paypal you some money? It would be personal, not commercial
and consequently not that much, but everything helps...
http://www.dovecot.org/donate.html
There, now I've done my part ;)
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 11:39 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
If you can assign two IPs to the server, one for SMTP, and one for
POP/IMAP, and you can use a SQL backend, you could craft your db schema
and queries to pull the appropriate password based on the local IP of
the
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 20:57 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
The goal here is to allow users to have different passwords for
SMTP authentication and POP/IMAP connections. I am converting an
existing installation to Dovecot...this installation currently has
quite a few
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Return-Path missing, rejection reason: Not enough disk space
May 8 09:49:53 ux-2s11-9 sendmail[29618]: l487nclf029596: to="|
/etc/mail/runde", ctladdr=dvtest (31045/102), delay=00:00:15,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=120033, dsn=2.0.0, stat
André Höpner wrote:
postmap -q [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf first
returns: someuser
The mailbox someuser exists and i can login with this
user on imap and i can deliver directly using deliver -d
but on mail delivery thrue postfix dovecot is not looking
for someuser. It l
M1 wrote:
> I can specified two passdb so I can mix auth source.
>
> Can I do similar thing with userdb? I would like to have uid, gid and
> home from static and quota from sql.
>
Just do that in your sql query:
"select 1000 as uid, 12 as gid, '/home/default' as home, quota from
userdb where ..."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if that is what I want. When setting mailbox_location to :
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
Users have inbox, trash and sent folder, but none of the other folders
that they have created in /home/Username.
Their home is defined in ldap.
If
Ed Lucero wrote:
I have installed dovecot and sieve using the FreeBSD ports. Authentication
is against a MySql Database.
Dovecot is running using deliver as the LDA.
But when I try to Sieve I get the following error in /var/log/dovecot.log
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Apr 19 14:07:19 Info: Load
Justin McAleer wrote:
I have apparently done something to mess up my test installation, as
deliver's attempts to send messages now fail with the following error:
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): execv() failed: No such file or directory
In these cases, I have sieve rules trying to send mes
Steven F Siirila wrote:
That's worth noting, but...
What about getting notices out to those folks whose IMAP client stays
connected (sometimes for days on end)?
In a plugin, what would trigger a check for new messages? I haven't
explored the plugin capabilities yet, so I don't know what th
Uldis Pakuls wrote:
Justin McAleer wrote:
I have apparently done something to mess up my test installation, as
deliver's attempts to send messages now fail with the following error:
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): execv() failed: No such file or directory
Are you useing mail_chroot
I have apparently done something to mess up my test installation, as
deliver's attempts to send messages now fail with the following error:
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): execv() failed: No such file or directory
In these cases, I have sieve rules trying to send messages. It had been
working thou
Justin McAleer wrote:
I was having problems with it seemingly not making updates at all. It
would do the initial usage calculation when I logged in, but never
updated when I sent a message or expunged anything. In the past
(months ago) I also saw problems when sending a message to multiple
Charles Marcus wrote:
Richard Laager wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 21:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'm planning on keeping v1.1 almost completely compatible with v1.0.
There could be some minor configuration file changes, but for most
people v1.0's dovecot.conf should work with v1.1.
Please
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:41 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
In my testing of using sql dictionary for quota, it appears pretty
buggy. Are you aware of such problems? Either way, would you consider
reliable dictionary quota support a target for 1.1?
Actually I think
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Features that I'm planning on implementing:
- Fully supported shared mailboxes and IMAP ACL extension
- Replace Squat FTS indexes with my new design
- Case-insensitive searches with non-ASCII text as well
- Maybe add support for all kinds of IMAP extensions that can be
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Justin McAleer wrote:
I have the source mail spools on NFS as well.
Just asking - not looking for a flame war. I had a miserable time
trying to get NFS working with just my simple LAN - I've had much
better results via Samba with either SMBFS or CIFS. Off-topic
Troy Engel wrote:
I'm reading the wiki et el. regarding indexes, but can't come up with
a coherent answer to the setup and what will happen. I want to take
the indexes and move them off of NFS (~/Maildir) and place in
/var/spool/dovecot/indexes, but not have to hand create everything
(user hom
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 10:41 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
OK, that also causes it to read the mailboxes and save the message sizes
to cache files.
I expected as much. But just to make sure we're on the same page, after
converting a user, only dovecot.inde
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 09:37 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
While doing some testing with converting accounts while simulating
incoming mail load (no other pop/imap processes going but 4 processes
converting users), we found that we were maxing out the local disk in
the
While doing some testing with converting accounts while simulating
incoming mail load (no other pop/imap processes going but 4 processes
converting users), we found that we were maxing out the local disk in
the server with the index activity. To find out that it was the index
activity, I mounte
I've noticed that if a user's maildir gets created by deliver or
pop/imap without the convert plugin running, the maildir structure is
fine (no maildirfolder file). But, if a user gets converted, there is a
maildirfolder file in the user's base maildir directory. As far as I can
tell, that does
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz.sig
mbox + NFS combination shouldn't break anymore. v1.0 still planned to
be released next friday.
- mbox: Give "mbox file was modified while we were syncing" error
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.4.2007, at 17.55, Justin McAleer wrote:
Timo, in rc30, deliver is not creating user directories properly. It
looks like it goes straight to creating the maildir, without creating
the home directory first if it doesn't exist. It also seems to be
doing this b
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc30.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc30.tar.gz.sig
So, this is it. Unless you can find a new and important bug within a
week, this release is the same as v1.0. I'll only update the version
number and NEWS file.
Change
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Changes since rc29:
* PAM: Lowercase the PAM service name when calling with "args = *".
Linux PAM did this internally already, but at least BSD didn't.
If your PAM file used to be in /etc/pam.d/IMAP or POP3 file you'll
need to lowercase
Since we're migrating from an existing system that allows periods in
folder names, I believe we must continue to allow them. So, I am
deciding what to use as the separator instead. Right now, I'm leaning
towards the backtick (`), since I don't think I have ever used it unless
I was trying to ex
David Craigon wrote:
I am trying to use dovecot. I've got a GFS2 shared volume on two servers
with dovecot running on both. On one server at a time, it works.
Sorry to not answer your question directly, but do you have a good
reason to be using GFS instead of NFS? We experimented with GFS
Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a) style the releases could be done b
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:36 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
rm -rf /var/indexes/*
rm -rf /var/mailstore/.../Maildir (for the test account)
send test message
rm -rf /var/mailstore/.../Maildir
send test message (corruption error, temporary failure to postfix, but
message
Timo Sirainen wrote:
However, I think a more simple way to recreate the problem is to simply
delete an existing maildir (with existing indexes) and send a message to
it. This shows the behavior every time on my system. I'll attach a tar
of all files in the index dir to this email though.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:14 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
Justin McAleer wrote:
...
Mar 16 12:51:15 node7 dovecot: IMAP(justin): Corrupted transaction log
file /var/indexes//j/ju/justin/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log: file_seq=1,
min_file_offset (63380
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:14 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
Justin McAleer wrote:
...
Mar 16 12:51:15 node7 dovecot: IMAP(justin): Corrupted transaction log
file /var/indexes//j/ju/justin/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log: file_seq=1,
min_file_offset (63380
Justin McAleer wrote:
...
Mar 16 12:51:15 node7 dovecot: IMAP(justin): Corrupted transaction log
file /var/indexes//j/ju/justin/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log: file_seq=1,
min_file_offset (63380) > max_file_offset (24)
Sorry to self-reply, but I just noticed that the domain part of the path
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes, it's supposed to recover from that. I couldn't reproduce this. It
always fixed the problem with the next try, or 3rd try at latest. If
this happens again, could you send me the dovecot.index and
dovecot.index.log files?
While attempting to recreate this I managed to
deliver logs the error in the subject whenever the userdb lookup fails.
I had a query discrepancy between postfix and dovecot, so messages were
accepted that shouldn't have been, but I figured deliver should probably
handle that a bit more gracefully :)
I'm finally picking my dovecot project back up now, and after upgrading
rc19 to rc27, I sent a test message to an existing account which
resulted in log entries like these:
Mar 16 08:45:37 node7 deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Corrupted transaction
log file /var/indexes/example/com/u/us/user/.INB
43 matches
Mail list logo
