Hi Timo, hi all others!
In fact, I've only read one person claiming that IPv6 support opens up
too many backdoors [1], but anyway, as I intend to run just
particular services, please give me your opinion if it's insecure to
have a dovecot server, which is accessed through a public IPv6
address...
People,
where to read about how to make the most of the current Dovecot search
capabilities, including squat and possibly also the related future plans?
There are many aspects like IMAP protocol itself, extensions, current support
into Dovecot, support among MUAs... Could you post some good
On Sunday 14 February 2010 11:26:17 Markus Beyer wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it is possible to put a dovecot managed maildir under a
vcs like system, for example git or bzr. I'd like to have a seamless
history of all mail going in and out of my mailboxes, so a vcs like system
seams a
On Sunday 14 February 2010 19:36:20 Timo Sirainen wrote:
Squat: Supposed to be completely transparent, but I don't like its
performance. The indexing speed is too slow. And it seems like the
incremental indexing rebuilds the index too often. (I used to use it,
but every time I wanted to do a
Hi,
came here to ask, if there are any ideas about a possible Dovecot feature,
which would allow execution of a specific mailfilter or other program after new
message is *moved* in specified mail location? The practical benefit on my side
would be, that there wouldn't be any need to do getmail
On Thursday 21 January 2010 15:18:28 Steffen Kaiser wrote:
One thing, that Sieve is not able to do, is to
deliver to multiple users without re-sending the mail.
Just what did you mean by multiple users?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 21 January 2010 11:13:22 Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-01-20 21:11:59 +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
I found a post in this list [0], which says sieve scripts can be used to
deliver mail as read. However, can it be done somehow conditionally, I
mean, with a direct or indirect
If deliver gets run with a non-root userid like this:
| deliver -m path/to/NEWmaildir , I wonder, is a connected IMAP MUA
automatically notified, that the new message has arrived in the new folder?
As I see from some experiments with Thunderbird, it has no problems with
immediate notifications
I found a post in this list [0], which says sieve scripts can be used to
deliver mail as read. However, can it be done somehow conditionally, I mean,
with a direct or indirect switch for deliver?
For a nonexistent example, it would be simply
| deliver -m path/to/maildir -r or maybe an
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 20:59:58 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 20.1.2010, at 22.53, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
I wonder, is a connected IMAP MUA
automatically notified, that the new message has arrived in the new
folder? As I see from some experiments with Thunderbird, it has no
problems
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 21:29:37 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 20.1.2010, at 23.17, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
What exactly? Does a MUA gets notified about both the new folder and
mail?
But this is more of a client and/or IMAP protocol problem. Nothing
Dovecot can do about it.
Could you
Hi all,
is there some easy way to inform Dovecot about a new delivery, which has
happened after postfix invoked maildrop, so the index files would be updated?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 15 January 2010 12:20:05 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Sex, 15 Jan 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
is there some easy way to inform Dovecot about a new delivery, which has
happened after postfix invoked maildrop, so the index files would be
updated?
That's exactly the task
On Friday 15 January 2010 14:44:07 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Sex, 15 Jan 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 12:20:05 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Sex, 15 Jan 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
is there some easy way to inform Dovecot about a new delivery, which
has
Hey,
as I understand from post [1], system folders with UTF-8 chars in their names
will only be available for use with Dovecot2 and I certainly look forward to
that, but somehow I was short of info about the current use of UTF characters
like ā, Ž etc. Should I just omit thinking about
It might be useful to add this conversation here:
On Friday 08 January 2010 22:43:27 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Friday 08 January 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
On top of that, its impossible
to create and access a new folder with KMail on my dovecot: it
doesn't happen, that a new folder would
Hi,
After setting up a maildir tree with :LAYOUT=fs and accessing it with KMail
and Thunderbird, various mail client-specific problems appeared, but, as I
didn't try with maildir++, I would like to confirm here: does that matter for
an IMAP client much if I store mail on server as :LAYOUT=fs
Hi,
Sorry if subj. is far from anything possible, but I try solving this problem:
On Saturday 12 December 2009 16:57:40 /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 03:37:17PM +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
Could anyone help me sorting this out: its very convenient to store
mails on mailserver
People,
There is an imap client, which runs with user1 uid, but when its accessed to
watch a maildir, whose (and its contents) ownership is user1:user1, this error
occurs:
dovecot: IMAP(user1): fchown(/path/user1/dovecot-uidlist.tmp, -1, 12(mail))
failed: Operation not permitted
On Friday 11 December 2009 17:22:52 you wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:17 +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
dovecot.conf contains this line: mail_privileged_group = mail
This is needed only with mbox format. You should probably just comment
it out.
chgrp user1 /path/user1
chmod 0700 /path
On Friday 04 December 2009 07:51:12 Joseba Torre wrote:
El Jueves 03 Diciembre 2009 a las 21:52, Kārlis Repsons escribió:
And there is no need to refresh any index files for IMAP users to
see / not to see moved mails?
Yes, but dovecot does that by itself. In my case, procmail is moving
Hello all!
My first question about dovecot turns out to be: what if I have something
outside of dovecot, which sometimes moves messages out of a mail folder and
other times into it? Does that make any problem for dovecot or indexing?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Thursday 03 December 2009 19:57:31 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
Hello all!
My first question about dovecot turns out to be: what if I have something
outside of dovecot, which sometimes moves messages out of a mail folder
and other times into it? Does that make
23 matches
Mail list logo
