Thank to other responses with links that i'll learning from! Thanks you
very much
On 2021-08-24 00:35, Marc wrote:
What are you trying to achieve with containerizing?
hmm, easy deployment & scaling? also reslient against hardware crashes,
etc.
You have to take into account that your
Hello, anyone here has containerized dovecot? Can I ask general advice
and experience please? are there any recommended articles/tutorial for
containerize deploymnt and auto-scaling? Thank you.
Hello, I understand director is like coordinated state database for the
proxies. Is it like a special lookup resource for Dovecot proxy?
If correct, makes sense proxies and directors should be deployed in
pairs. But few places the docs talk about maybe different number of
directors v. proxies
On 2021-01-22 16:02, @lbutlr wrote:
On 21 Jan 2021, at 18:08, MRob wrote:
Hello,
I just found user who has single folder (standard maildir format) that
filled with over 8mil files and 800GB in the /tmp subdirectory of that
folder:
Are they real files or hard links?
They are files
Hello,
I just found user who has single folder (standard maildir format) that
filled with over 8mil files and 800GB in the /tmp subdirectory of that
folder:
/email/domain/username/.Folder/tmp
The files in there are normal maildir email files.
I think the dir ran out of inode space so its
1. If I want per-user encryption am I correct I should configure
global keys with all related settings override in the userdb lookup?
2. If I do not want to encrypt some user accounts, is it enough to
omit the mail_crypt_global_private_key from the userdb lookup? In
other word, mail_plugins
I read the mailcrypt plugin document on the wiki and had couple
questions.
1. If I want per-user encryption am I correct I should configure global
keys with all related settings override in the userdb lookup?
2. If I do not want to encrypt some user accounts, is it enough to omit
the
On 2019-05-22 08:18, Tuomo Soini via dovecot wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2019 18:24:46 +
MRob via dovecot wrote:
Many people prefer to use LMTP for delivery from postfix for better
efficiency but X-Original-to header support still missing after many
years. One affect of this is need to set
Many people prefer to use LMTP for delivery from postfix for better
efficiency but X-Original-to header support still missing after many
years. One affect of this is need to set
sieve_vacation_dont_check_recipient = yes which violate Sieve standard
and cause auto-replyies sent to messages that
Hi, I couldn't really find documentation about ssl_dh_parameters_length
except for mention in passing on the page
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration
For version 2.3 and above is that setting necessary? If so what are the
values I can use, is setting it high like 4096
one solution that work is put a mailbox into the parent namespace like:
mailbox "Virtual/" {
auto = subscribe
}
nothing in the "namespace myvirt" would work.
On 2019-05-08 21:02, MRob via dovecot wrote:
FYI in subscription file for namespace I see empty line when
FYI in subscription file for namespace I see empty line when the top
level prefix is subscribed. Works perfectly just need to make it
automatic
On 2019-05-08 20:50, MRob via dovecot wrote:
In virtual namespace I can have:
namespace myvirt {
location = blah
prefix=Virtual/
separator
In virtual namespace I can have:
namespace myvirt {
location = blah
prefix=Virtual/
separator=/
mailbox "My folder" {
auto = subscribe
}
}
And i see email clients successful display subscribed "My folder" but
the top-level prefix "Virtual/" is not subscribed. I see the Virtual/
On 2019-05-05 02:37, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote:
On 5/3/2019 11:22 AM, MRob via dovecot wrote:> That is not dynamically
generated and it isn't limited to just one
mailbox (dovecot terminology here is confusing, normally a mailbox is
a mail account (user), but in this context "ma
On 2019-05-03 16:03, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote:
On 5/2/2019 12:47 PM, MRob via dovecot wrote:
hi, I spent time learning about virtual mailboxes. Is there some way
to create dynamic virtual mailboxes? I mean, when I look at a mailbox,
I want to see only unread messages or flagged messages
On 2019-05-01 22:14, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote:
On 4/30/2019 11:13 PM, MRob via dovecot wrote:
The examples in 15-mailboxes.conf
# If you have a virtual "All messages" mailbox:
#mailbox virtual/All {
# special_use = \All
# comment = All my messages
#}
# I
hi, I spent time learning about virtual mailboxes. Is there some way to
create dynamic virtual mailboxes? I mean, when I look at a mailbox, I
want to see only unread messages or flagged messages in that mailbox.
The examples in 15-mailboxes.conf
# If you have a virtual "All messages" mailbox:
#mailbox virtual/All {
# special_use = \All
# comment = All my messages
#}
# If you have a virtual "Flagged" mailbox:
#mailbox virtual/Flagged {
# special_use = \Flagged
# comment = All my
On 2019-02-03 21:12, Philon wrote:
On 03 Feb 2019, at 22:07, MRob wrote:
Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from
reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and
that it would conserve disc space.
But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double
Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading
about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it
would conserve disc space.
But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported.
I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one
On 2018-03-19 06:31, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 19.03.2018 06:40, MRob wrote:
Are the dovecot environment variables mutable? I'd like to override
like:
set "${env.vnd.dovecot.username}" "someu...@example.org"
Or better, I prefer to override %u Dovecot variable during the userd
Are the dovecot environment variables mutable? I'd like to override
like:
set "${env.vnd.dovecot.username}" "someu...@example.org"
Or better, I prefer to override %u Dovecot variable during the userdb
lookup.
Is either possible?
PS, when Sieve does extdata lookups for username key, where
On 2018-03-02 09:57, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 02.03.2018 09:38, MRob wrote:
On 2018-03-01 22:59, John Woods wrote:
Hey Everyone,
We are getting a compile error for Dovecot 2.2.34 on Solaris 11.3
x86, using Solaris Studio 12.6 compiler, and it doesn't occur with
Dovecot 2.2.33.
Making all
On 2018-03-01 22:59, John Woods wrote:
Hey Everyone,
We are getting a compile error for Dovecot 2.2.34 on Solaris 11.3
x86, using Solaris Studio 12.6 compiler, and it doesn't occur with
Dovecot 2.2.33.
Making all in charset-alias
Can someone easily explain what the usage of this plugin
Uh??
doveadm mailbox delete -u myuser -r -s foldername
mailbox: invalid option -- 'r'
Docs say -r is recursive. So how do I delete recursive mailbox??
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Mailbox
Hi, this is partly Postfix related, but I want to know if there could be
way to distinguish port of the SASL AUTH request to segregate user
services.
Currently I use unix listener for dovecot sasl auth, but could change to
inet_listener.
Only way I can think is to have different SASL AUTH
On 2017-04-08 01:21, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 4/8/2017 om 10:08 AM schreef MRob:
On 2017-04-08 01:03, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 4/7/2017 om 7:29 PM schreef MRob:
On 2017-04-05 18:50, MRob wrote:
RFC 6785 says I should be able to run scripts when a command
changes
flags on a message but I can't
On 2017-04-05 18:50, MRob wrote:
RFC 6785 says I should be able to run scripts when a command changes
flags on a message but I can't understand what to put in
imapsieve_mailboxXXX_causes. Dovecot logs something like STORE as an
invalid cause.
How do I run an administrator Sieve script caused
RFC 6785 says I should be able to run scripts when a command changes
flags on a message but I can't understand what to put in
imapsieve_mailboxXXX_causes. Dovecot logs something like STORE as an
invalid cause.
How do I run an administrator Sieve script caused from change in flags?
On 2017-03-14 01:52, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 14.03.2017 05:57, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
Am 11. März 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mro...@insiberia.net>
On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
Am 11. März 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mro...@insiberia.net>:
We have a need for some users to have an additional folder
c
On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
Am 11. März 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mro...@insiberia.net>:
We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created
and
subscribed for them.
Is is possible to return an override for the d
On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote:
On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
Am 11. März 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mro...@insiberia.net>:
We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created
and
subscribed for them.
Is is possible to return an override for the d
On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote:
Am 11. März 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mro...@insiberia.net>:
We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created
and
subscribed for them.
Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace
inbox&q
We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created and
subscribed for them.
Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace inbox"
containing the needed mailbox definitions in the userdb lookup for
such users? If so, how would the userdb lookup result be
Thank you so much Steffen
On 2017-01-30 00:35, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Hello,
We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created and
subscribed for them.
Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace inbox"
containing the needed mailbox definitions in the userdb lookup for such
users? If so, how would the userdb lookup result
On 2016-12-05 16:37, MRob wrote:
On 2016-12-05 05:53, MRob wrote:
On 2016-12-04 23:18, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, MRob wrote:
I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by
default, since of course, Sieve
On 2016-12-05 05:53, MRob wrote:
On 2016-12-04 23:18, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, MRob wrote:
I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by
default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should
On 2016-12-05 06:16, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 5-12-2016 om 14:36 schreef MRob:
The examples on the imapsieve documentation page use COPY but not
APPEND to watch messages coming into a folder. Are there not
circumstances that a client would APPEND a message to a folder instead
of COPY
On 2016-12-05 15:29, MRob wrote:
On 2016-12-05 15:26, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 12/6/2016 om 12:23 AM schreef MRob:
I don't know how I managed to compile only using direct access of
${imap.user} before since now I get an unknown namespace error on
my
test script.
But doing it this way
On 2016-12-05 15:26, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 12/6/2016 om 12:23 AM schreef MRob:
I don't know how I managed to compile only using direct access of
${imap.user} before since now I get an unknown namespace error on
my
test script.
But doing it this way compiles:
require ["enviro
I don't know how I managed to compile only using direct access of
${imap.user} before since now I get an unknown namespace error on my
test script.
But doing it this way compiles:
require ["environment", "variables", "vnd.dovecot.debug"];
if environment :matches "imap.user" "*" {
set "u"
On 2016-12-05 07:22, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 5-12-2016 om 16:10 schreef MRob:
On 2016-12-05 06:13, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 5-12-2016 om 14:32 schreef MRob:
Could you show me your full script? I am mainly interested in the
require statements involved.
I don't know how I managed to compile
On 2016-12-05 06:13, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 5-12-2016 om 14:32 schreef MRob:
On 2016-12-05 04:38, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 5-12-2016 om 13:28 schreef MRob:
RFC6785 says imap.user and imap.email environment variables should
be made available but I can't access them no matter what I try
On 2016-12-05 00:02, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 05.12.2016 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 05.12.2016 09:34, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Dec 2016, MRob wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, is there a way to edit a message header using doveadm?
>
On 2016-12-04 23:18, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, MRob wrote:
I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by
default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should go.
However, I'm seeing a .forward
On 2016-12-04 12:06, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 12/4/2016 om 11:42 AM schreef Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT):
Thanks a lot for indexing fixes, Dovecot team.
Any news for Pigeonhole? Currently had to rollup some commits from GIT
to make it pass vacation test set with 2.2.27.
What problem are you
The examples on the imapsieve documentation page use COPY but not APPEND
to watch messages coming into a folder. Are there not circumstances that
a client would APPEND a message to a folder instead of COPY? Is APPEND
only used by most clients for adding a sent message to the sent folder?
I'm
On 2016-12-05 04:38, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 5-12-2016 om 13:28 schreef MRob:
RFC6785 says imap.user and imap.email environment variables should be
made available but I can't access them no matter what I try. Are they
not implemented because vnd.dovecot.environment already provides
RFC6785 says imap.user and imap.email environment variables should be
made available but I can't access them no matter what I try. Are they
not implemented because vnd.dovecot.environment already provides the
username? (which does work for me)
If imap.user and imap.email are there, can you
How can I query the current pigeonhole version from a running instance
to verify it is what I expect?
Possible to get `dovecot --version` to show things like that?
Hello, is there a way to edit a message header using doveadm?
I see how I can fetch the things I need, but even if I can't edit in
place; if I extract the full message, edit it, there doesn't seem to be
a way to append it back again?
I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by
default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should go.
However, I'm seeing a .forward file being honoured by the LMTP delivery
agent. Is this to be expected?
54 matches
Mail list logo
