"doveadm altmove -r" is not moving anything from alternate to default storage
Somebody in the mailing list said that reverting this commit fixed doveadm altmove -r behaviour:
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/2795f6183049a8a4cc489869b3e866dc20a8a732
Should this be co
Regards
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 11:28 PM
From: "justina colmena ~biz"
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Question about doveadm altmove
On Sunday, March 21, 2021 12:16:28 PM AKDT María Arrea wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We are running dovecot 2.3.13. Full doveconf -n output be
Hello.
We are running dovecot 2.3.13. Full doveconf -n output below
In 2.3.14 Changelog I found this:
* Remove XZ/LZMA write support. Read support will be removed in future release.
We are using mdbox + XZ/LZMA for alternate storage (messages older than 2 weeks are moved to ALT st
We use sabredav for caldav+cardav and roundcube+agendav for nice
web ui :)
Regards
El 21/10/18 a las 15:04, Erwan David escribió:
Le 10/21/18 à 12:29, m...@caloro.ch a écrit :
Hello
I running no long time with me Email System Postfix/Dovecot/mysql and
i’am whery happy
the featu
dovecot.index.log.2
In today logs I have not found any "No such file or directory" so
far. If I can do something to help you debug this, ask for in in this
thread.
Regards
María.
El 13/12/17 a las 20:09, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 13 Dec 2017, at 9.55, María Arrea wrote:
Stephan, thank you very much for your hard work. I want to ask your
opinion about jmap ( http://jmap.io/ ) , do you think is a viable
alternative to current IMAP + MSA ?
Regards
María
El 12/12/17 a las 00:14, Stephan Bosch escribió:
Hi,
As some of you know, I started implement
We have upgraded today from Dovecot 2.2.31 to Dovecot 2.2.33.2 and
modified our config to include ITERINDEX in mail_location and we are
detecting some errors like this:
/Dec 13 08:17:31 buzon_rhel7 dovecot: imap(rboloix): Error:
stat(/buzones/location/18/48/rboloix/mailboxes/SIT - Pra&A
We migrated 36 TB of mail (65K users) from Sun Messaging to Dovecot
using Imapsync, worked like a charm.
Regards
María
El 31/10/17 a las 15:30, Robert Schetterer escribió:
Am 31.10.2017 um 14:06 schrieb María Arrea:
If you use Linux you can use netfilter (iptables) mark feature to
track individual connections from a given IP, and above a threshold you
can shape the bandwitdh based on those iptables mark
If you use Linux you can use netfilter (iptables) mark feature to
track individual connections from a given IP, and above a threshold you
can shape the bandwitdh based on those iptables mark. For example, if an
IMAP connection from ip X exceed 100 megabytes of data, bandwitdh for
that ip w
Thank you Mr. Aki
Should this info about ITERINDEX be present in
https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation ? Bit confusing now.
El 16/10/17 a las 12:35, Aki Tuomi escribió:
On 16.10.2017 13:30, María Arrea wrote:
El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribió:
ITERINDEX is a flag, it'
vecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n
On 16.10.2017 13:22, María Arrea wrote:
I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this
the expected?
Regards
María
El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, María Arrea escribió:
Hell
I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this
the expected?
Regards
María
El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, María Arrea escribió:
Hello
I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my
filesystem layout
/indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD dr
Hello
I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my
filesystem layout
/indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives
/buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks
/buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks
This is my mail_location:
mail_location =
mdbox:/buzones/doma
Hello
I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my
filesystem layout
/indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives
/buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks
/buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks
This is my mail_location:
mail_location =
mdbox:/buzones/
Hello
We have a big Dovecot Server (over 20 TB of mail, 40K users, over
30K iops) and we are evaluating a new SAN Array. We have competitive
proposals from Pure Storage (All Flash) , HP 3Par (Hybrid), NetApp FaaS
(Hybrid) & EMC Unity (Hybrid). We rely in mdbox+zlib for main storage
and md
16 matches
Mail list logo