TL;DR:
Sure, this affects medium/large/Enterprise folks (that's where I was using
Director -- though currently retired, so no existing self-interest in this
email).
This will also affect *any* installation with a whopping two dovecot
servers with mdbox backends talking to a single li
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 1:34 PM John Fawcett wrote:
> On 07/01/2022 21:03, Ken Wright wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 18:50 +0100, John Fawcett wrote:
> >> it may or may not be related to the tls issue, but I think you will
> >> want to investigate that message about the SQL query syntax error.
>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:16 AM @lbutlr wrote:
> On 03 Mar 2021, at 05:33, Yassine Chaouche
> wrote:
> >> Am I missing some reason I would need/want to keep track of that
> specific login time separately?
>
> > What about mbox files ?
>
> Is anyone foolish enough to use mbox in 2021?
>
> It's de
I was wondering if there was any imminent support in 2.3.12+ for using a
username to log into Redis, as well as support for using TLS to connect to
Redis. And if not, I'd like to put in a feature request for those two
things (AUTH with username/password, and TLS connections to Redis).
Specifically
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:34 AM @lbutlr wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:57, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > But I think the sed here is missing 's' from start, so this does not
> actually do anything...
>
> Copy/paste/edit error. The s is there in the file.
>
> darkmode.sh:
> #!/bin/sh
> echo $1 | sed -e '
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:08 PM David Morsberger
wrote:
> I wish someone could help me. I’m trying to track auth in the lmtp code.
> Nice code base but I’m having trouble tracking the call stack for the error
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 9, 2020, at 08:00, David Morsberger wrote:
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:36 AM Claudio Corvino
wrote:
> Thanks Jochen,
>
> no mixups present at all, file assigned to UID 501.
>
> Since this problem started few hours after the Debian upgrade, I think
> it is related to it.
>
> I don't know if something has changed on the NFS client side on Deb
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:31 AM Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>
> > On 27/11/2019 21:28 Mark Moseley via dovecot
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:22 PM Aki Tuomi via dovecot <
> dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21.11.2019 23
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:22 PM Aki Tuomi via dovecot
wrote:
>
> On 21.11.2019 23.57, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure a network for a cert instead of an ip?
> >
> > Something like this:
> >
> > local 192.0.2.0 {
> > ssl_cert = > ssl_key = > }
> >
> > Or
>
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:57 PM Niels Kobschätzki via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
> On 9/9/19 6:18 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> > On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:27, Niels Kobschätzki
> wrote:
> >> The moment I remove those folders, the size gets calculated correctly.
> Unfortunately those fold
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 9:52 PM Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 10 April 2019 05:00 Mark Moseley via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:37 PM Mark Moseley < moseleym...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley < moseleym
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>
> > On 12 April 2019 21:09 Mark Moseley via dovecot
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > TL;DR:
> >
> > Can director_username_hash use %{userdb:...} or %{passdb:...} ?
> >
> > =
TL;DR:
Can director_username_hash use %{userdb:...} or %{passdb:...} ?
This is on Ubuntu Precise, running dovecot 2.2.36. It's a fully production,
director-ized env, so assume everything is working correctly. Happy to post
doveconf if it's relevant but wanted
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:37 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley
> wrote:
>
>> Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to
>> throw the word 'bug' around
>> (since 99 times out of 1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:35 PM John Fawcett via dovecot
wrote:
> On 09/04/2019 22:03, Mark Moseley via dovecot wrote:
> > I'm curious if this is still the right place to report potential bugs
> > with Dovecot.
> >
> > Is there a Dovecot bug tracker somewh
I'm curious if this is still the right place to report potential bugs with
Dovecot.
Is there a Dovecot bug tracker somewhere?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
> Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to
> throw the word 'bug' around
> (since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the config),
> but I can't think of a
Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to throw
the word 'bug' around
(since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the config), but
I can't think of any way
that this could be a config issue, esp when the pre-2.2.34 version works as
expected.
I noticed dur
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:46 AM Bernd Wurst via dovecot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we're operating dovecot on a small server. Some years ago, we migrated
> from courier IMAP to dovecot. Therefore, we defined our default
> Namespace "inbox" with prefix "INBOX." to have this compatible. I found
> this in
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:31 PM Chris Dillon
wrote:
> I’ve had the opportunity to test the same configuration with a fresh build
> of the git master branch (2.4.devel) and the issue also occurs there. I
> see that "mailbox_list_index = yes" is now enabled by default. It can
> still be disabled
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 1:59 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
> This has got to be something weird in my config. And the standard
> disclaimer of '"happy to post doveconf -n, but wanted to see if this is
> normal first" :)
>
> Background: Ubuntu Xenial, running 2.2.36. Mailbo
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:04 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:37 PM Aki Tuomi
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01 February 2019 at 23:16 Mark Moseley < moseleym...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Running: Ubuntu xenial, dovecot 2.2.3
This has got to be something weird in my config. And the standard
disclaimer of '"happy to post doveconf -n, but wanted to see if this is
normal first" :)
Background: Ubuntu Xenial, running 2.2.36. Mailbox type is mdbox and I've
got a period separator in my inbox namespace:
namespace {
hidden =
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:37 PM Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>
> On 01 February 2019 at 23:16 Mark Moseley < moseleym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Running: Ubuntu xenial, dovecot 2.2.36
>
> I've been working on moving our user base from maildir to mdbox and trying
> to com
Running: Ubuntu xenial, dovecot 2.2.36
I've been working on moving our user base from maildir to mdbox and trying
to come up with solutions for things like moving emails around. In the
past, with maildir, our support guys could just mv the files around and
done. For mdbox, I've been working on get
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:58 PM James Brown via dovecot
wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2019, at 4:35 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 30 January 2019 at 07:12 James Brown < jlbr...@bordo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
> >> My settings:
> ...
> >> userdb {
> >> driver = passwd
> >> }
> >> userdb {
> >> driver = prefetch
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Markus Eckerl wrote:
>
> The problem is, that he misconfigured the servers of these customers. In
>> detail: their servers are trying to fetch email every 2 - 5 seconds. For
>> every email address.
>>
>> In the past I conta
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On January 23, 2018 at 7:09 PM Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday 11 of January 2018, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> > > Seems we might've made a unexpected change here when we revamped the
> ssl
> > > code.
> >
> > Revamped, in
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On October 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM Federico Bartolucci
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > it's the first time for me writing to the list, I'm trying to change the
> > location into which the Dovecot's locks are done reserving a special
> > tem
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:18 AM, wrote:
>
> > On December 22, 2017 at 8:20 AM Mark Moseley
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On December 22, 2017 at 6:43 AM Mark Moseley
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2) Is there an appropriate way to return data with spaces in it (or
>
>
>
>
>
> 2) Is there an appropriate way to return data with spaces in it (or
> presumably other non-alphanum chars. My quota name had a space in it,
> which
> somehow got interpreted as 'yes' , i.e.:
>
> imap: Error: Failed to initialize quota: Invalid quota root quota: Unknown
> quota backend: ye
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 23.16, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >
> > doveadm(test1-sha...@test.com): Panic: file buffer.c: line 97
> > (buffer_check_limits): assertion failed: (buf->used <= buf->alloc)
> ..
>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.0.rc1.tar.gz
>> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.0.rc1.tar.gz.sig
>>
>> It's f
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.0.rc1.tar.gz
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.0.rc1.tar.gz.sig
>
> It's finally time for v2.3 release branch! There are several new and
> exciting features in it. I'm especiall
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Op 29-11-2017 om 6:17 schreef Aki Tuomi:
>
>> On November 29, 2017 at 4:37 AM Mark Moseley
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Just happened to be surfing the docs and saw this. This is
Just happened to be surfing the docs and saw this. This is beyond awesome:
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/Lua
Any words of wisdom on using it? I'd be putting a bunch of mysql logic in
it. Any horrible gotchas there? When it says 'blocking', should I assume
that means that a auth worker pr
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> Sorry, Aki, I don't follow you. Did I do it wrong in the file 91-stats
> that I shared in my original mail (attached here)?
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 03/11/17 16:50, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > You need to add the stats listener, by yourself.
> >
> > Aki
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On September 28, 2017 at 7:20 PM Mark Moseley
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Ma
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >>> I've been digging
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote:
> > I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced lately.
> There
> > are cases (IP ranges, so could be wrapped up in remote {} blocks) where
>
I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced lately. There
are cases (IP ranges, so could be wrapped up in remote {} blocks) where
it'd be nice to skip the auth policy (internal hosts that I can trust, but
that are hitting the same servers as the outside world).
Is there any way to
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Harald Leithner
wrote:
> Am 2017-09-15 21:25, schrieb Mark Moseley:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner
>> wrote:
>>
>> Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32?
>>>
>>> thx
&
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner wrote:
> Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32?
>
> thx
>
> Harald
>
>
I just ran into the same thing myself. For me, when I added this to the
"location" in the expunged namespace, it started working again:
...:LISTINDEX=expunged.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Teemu Huovila
wrote:
> Below is an answer by the current weakforced main developer. It overlaps
> partly with Samis answer.
>
> ---snip---
> > Do you have any hints/tips/guidelines for things like sizing, both in a
> > per-server sense (memory, mostly) and in a c
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> On 19.07.2017 02:38, Mark Moseley wrote:
> > I've been playing with weakforced, so it fills in the 'fail2ban across a
> > cluster' niche (not to mention RBLs). It seems to work well, once you've
&g
I've been playing with weakforced, so it fills in the 'fail2ban across a
cluster' niche (not to mention RBLs). It seems to work well, once you've
actually read the docs :)
I was curious if anyone had played with it and was *very* curious if anyone
was using it in high traffic production. Getting t
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 3.44, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >
> > It'd be great if https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-June/104763.html
> > could make it into this RC (assuming you guys approved it back when it
> was
&
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.31.rc1.tar.gz
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.31.rc1.tar.gz.sig
>
> Unless new bugs are found, this will be the final v2.2.31 release, which
> will be released on Monday.
>
>
I was curious what the status of this redis auth patch is:
https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-June/104763.html
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:24 PM, M. Balridge wrote:
> Quoting Mark Moseley :
>
> > I've tried using IMAP with mail_location pointed at the snapshot, but,
> > though I can get a listing of emails in the mailbox, the fetch fails when
> > dovecot can't wri
>
> >
> > > I've tried using IMAP with mail_location pointed at the snapshot, but,
> > > though I can get a listing of emails in the mailbox, the fetch fails
> when
> > > dovecot can't write-lock dovecot.index.log.
> >
> > I've thought about doing this someday (adding snapshots to a user's
> > name
This is a 'has anyone run into this and solved it' post. And yes, I've been
reading and re-reading TFM but without luck. The background is that I'm
working on tooling before we start a mass maildir->mdbox conversion. One of
those tools is recovering mail from backups (easy as pie with maildir).
We
Timo/Aki/Docecot guys, any hints here? Is this a bug? Design issue?
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM Mark Moseley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Mark Moseley
> wrote:
>
>> We just had a bunch of backend boxes go down due to a DDoS in our
>> director cluster. Wh
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:13:07 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On 6 Apr 2017, at 21.14, Mark Moseley wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> imap-hibernate processes are similar to ima
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> We just had a bunch of backend boxes go down due to a DDoS in our director
> cluster. When the DDoS died down, our director ring was a mess.
>
> Each box had thousands (and hundreds per second, which is a bit much) of
> log
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2017, at 9.56, Christian Balzer wrote:
> >
> >> For no particular reason besides wanting to start conservatively, we've
> got
> >> client_limit set to 50 on the hibernate procs (with 1100 total
> hibernated
> >> connections on the b
We've been using hibernate for about half a year with no ill effects. There
were various logged errors in earlier versions of dovecot, but even with
those, we never heard a reported customer-side error (almost always when
transitioning from hibernate back to regular imap; in the case of those
error
We just had a bunch of backend boxes go down due to a DDoS in our director
cluster. When the DDoS died down, our director ring was a mess.
Each box had thousands (and hundreds per second, which is a bit much) of
log lines like the following:
Apr 03 19:59:29 director: Warning: director(10.1.20.10:
Just a quickie: why is "Connection queue full" logged under Info, instead
of something like error? Or at least have the word 'error' in it?
Seems like a pretty error-ish thing to happen. Anything that causes the
connection to fail from the server side should show up in a grep -i for
error. I.e. I
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Francisco Wagner C. Freire <
wgrcu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync
> problems everyone. Using 4 or less works perfect.
>
> Em 24 de fev de 2017 4:30 PM, "Mark Moseley"
&g
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 24 Feb 2017, at 0.08, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> >
>> > As someone who is about to begin the process of moving from maildir to
>> > mdbox on NFS (and therefore just about to start the &#x
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
>
> > On Feb 24, 2017, at 6:08 AM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >
> > * Do you use the perl poolmon script or something else? The perl script
> was
> > being weird for me, so I rewrote it in python but it basically
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 0.08, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >
> > As someone who is about to begin the process of moving from maildir to
> > mdbox on NFS (and therefore just about to start the 'director-ization' of
>
As someone who is about to begin the process of moving from maildir to
mdbox on NFS (and therefore just about to start the 'director-ization' of
everything) for ~6.5m mailboxes, I'm curious if anyone can share any
experiences with it. The list is surprisingly quiet about this subject, and
articles
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2016, at 2.22, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>
> How about this updated patch?
>
>
> Nope, still lets me move messages into the over-quota namespace.
>
> Both these are true in quota_check:
>
> ctx-&g
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> >
>> &g
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> >> On 23 Nov 2016, at 0.49, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If I move
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2016, at 0.49, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >
> > If I move messages between namespaces, it appears to ignore the quotas
> I've
> > set on them. A *copy* will trigger the quota error. But a *move* jus
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Fred Turner wrote:
> Yeah, I gradually figured out it wouldn't work yesterday when delving back
> into this and testing. No separate quotas per namespaces until 2.1 or
> something, I think?
>
> So, got any suggestions on getting it to work with v2.x? I found an ol
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Fred Turner wrote:
> Hey Everybody—
>
> Posted this to the list a couple of months ago, but didn’t get any
> responses. Is there a better place to ask this question about quota &
> namespace configuration? Seems like a lot of the discussion here is a
> little deep
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi, I'm are running a classic Dovecot setup:
>
> About ten thousand connected users
> mailbox in Maildir format shared via NFS (NetApp)
> Director for POP/IMAP
> Delivery via Dovecot LDA
>
> All works fine but sometimes I see a spike on th
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> For the last few days I've been thinking about my company and what it really
> should do, and as much as the current plan seems reasonable, I think in good
> conscience I really can't help but to bring up an alternative plan:
>
>...
I'm sl
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Here's a list of things I've been thinking about implementing for Dovecot
> v2.2. Probably not all of them will make it, but I'm at least interested in
> working on these if I have time.
>
> Previously I've mostly been working on things tha
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> We've been collecting some stats to see what kind of benefits
> UP/SquirrelMail's IMAP Proxy in for our SOGo webmail users. Dovecot is
> running in High-performance mode http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess
> with authentication cachin
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Mark Zealey wrote:
> 06-02-2012 22:47, Timo Sirainen yazmış:
>
>> On 3.2.2012, at 16.16, Mark Zealey wrote:
>>
>>> I was doing some testing on sdbox yesterday. Basically I did the
>>> following procedure:
>>>
>>> 1) Create new sdbox; deliver 2 messages into it (u.1,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12.1.2012, at 20.32, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>>>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:17 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>>>> I moved some mail into the alt storage:
>>>>>
>>>>> doveadm a
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2012, at 20.29, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> If there are multiple hosts, it seems like the most robust thing to do
>> would be to exhaust the existing connections and if none of those
>> succeed, then start a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.1.2012, at 21.13, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
>> related to the other:
>>
>> 1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn'
In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
related to the other:
1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go
over? Since we're 100% NFS, we've scaled servers horizontally quite a
bit. At
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 7:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
>
>>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>>
>>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>>
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.1.2012, at 19.54, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> I'm in the middle of working on a Maildir->mdbox migration as well,
>> and likewise, over NFS (all Netapps but moving to Sun), and likewise
>> with split LDA a
>>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>>
>>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>>
>>> * Dovecot servers have been split based on their role
>>>
>>> - Dovecot LDA Servers (running LMTP protocol)
>>>
>>> - Dovecot POP/IMAP servers (running P
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:17 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> Just had a minor suggestion, with no clue how hard/easy it would be to
>> implement:
>>
>> The %f flag in deliver_log_format seems to pick up the From: head
Just had a minor suggestion, with no clue how hard/easy it would be to
implement:
The %f flag in deliver_log_format seems to pick up the From: header,
instead of the "MAIL FROM:<...>" arg. It'd be handy to have a %F that
shows the "MAIL FROM" arg instead. I'm looking at tracking emails
through log
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:36:38AM -0800, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> Also another idea to avoid them in the first place:
>>
>> service auth-worker {
>> idle_kill = 20
>> }
>
> Ah, set the auth-worker timeout to less than the mysql timeout t
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 13.01.2012 19:29, schrieb Mark Moseley:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 13.1.2012, at 4.00, Mark Moseley wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm running 2.0.17 and I'm s
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2012, at 4.00, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> I'm running 2.0.17 and I'm still seeing a decent amount of "MySQL
>> server has gone away" errors, despite having multiple hosts defined in
>> my au
I'm running 2.0.17 and I'm still seeing a decent amount of "MySQL
server has gone away" errors, despite having multiple hosts defined in
my auth userdb 'connect'. This is Debian Lenny 32-bit and I'm seeing
the same thing with 2.0.16 on Debian Squeeze 64-bit.
E.g.:
Jan 12 20:30:33 auth-worker: Err
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:17 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>> I moved some mail into the alt storage:
>>>
>>> doveadm altmove -u jo...@example.com seen savedbefore 1w
>>>
>>> and now I want to move it back to the
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 16:04 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> > The gotcha is that you have two completely independent quotas with
>> > independent usage/limits for the INBOX and Archive namespaces. If that
>> > i
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:23 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> > Thanks to a fortuitously unrelated thread ("how to disable quota for
>> > second namespace"), I got the quota part figured out and that seem
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> I've been goofing with this all day with 2.0.15 and I'm starting to
>> realize that either a) I'm not that smart, b) it's been so long since
>>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> I've been goofing with this all day with 2.0.15 and I'm starting to
> realize that either a) I'm not that smart, b) it's been so long since
> I messed with namespaces that I'm going about it completely wrong,
I've been goofing with this all day with 2.0.15 and I'm starting to
realize that either a) I'm not that smart, b) it's been so long since
I messed with namespaces that I'm going about it completely wrong, or
c) it's just not possible. I haven't posted 'doveconf -n' and other
details, because mainly
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
> I see back in November of last year, a thread about using client_limit in the
> imap service (not imap-login) that would allow each imap process serve more
> than
> one connection. Sounded good, until I tried it!
>
> When I did, unlike the OP
2010/12/16 Jose Celestino :
> On Qui, 2010-12-16 at 12:56 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Cor Bosman :
>
>> > I saw someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
>>
>> I guess I missed that one
>>
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/15/470
Timo, if we apply the above kernel patch, do we still need to
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Mark Moseley put forth on 12/9/2010 12:18 PM:
>
>> If you at some point upgrade to >2.6.35, I'd be interested to hear if
>> the load skyrockets on you. I also get the impression that the load
>> average calcul
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:18 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> Upping the client_limit actually results in less processes, since a
>> single process can service up to #client_limit connections. When I
>> bumped up the c
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Mark Moseley :
>
>> > We're on 2.6.32 and the load only goes up when I change dovecot (not
>> > when I change the kernel, which I didn't do so far)
>>
>> If you at some point upgrade to >
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
