On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:04:28AM -0400, Chris Young wrote:
> Gmail doesn't let me filter on message headers so I've updated my filter as
> follows
Yes it does. I use this: (list:dovecot OR to:dovecot)
It matches both mail received from the mailing-list and those I send to
the mailing-list.
+
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:18:32AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.11.2012, at 16.12, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>
> > We have SLES-11 SP2 Xen VMs running dovecot as IMAP proxies. At VMs
> > startup, dovecot almost always shows these errors:
> >
> > Nov 16 1
:12:59PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have SLES-11 SP2 Xen VMs running dovecot as IMAP proxies. At VMs
> startup, dovecot almost always shows these errors:
>
> Nov 16 14:29:19 server dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.10 starting up (core
> dumps disabled)
>
Hello,
We have SLES-11 SP2 Xen VMs running dovecot as IMAP proxies. At VMs
startup, dovecot almost always shows these errors:
Nov 16 14:29:19 server dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.10 starting up (core dumps
disabled)
Nov 16 14:29:55 server dovecot: master: Error: service(anvil): Initial status
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:55:12PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> Does dovecot support the subject Alternative Name email value [1] as
> ssl_cert_username_field? If so, how should it be specified in the
> configuration?
Well, I just found the wiki states no:
"The text is
Hello,
Does dovecot support the subject Alternative Name email value [1] as
ssl_cert_username_field? If so, how should it be specified in the
configuration?
Thanks.
[1]
http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/x509v3_config.html#Subject_Alternative_Name_
--
Nicolas
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:06:51PM +0100, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> On 1/11/2012 8:01 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> >
> >I would like to use IMAPs, instead of IMAP+STARTTLS, from proxy to
> >backend, and have Managesieve still working. Is this supported?
>
> Although
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:34:33PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.1.2012, at 21.01, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>
> > I would like to use IMAPs, instead of IMAP+STARTTLS, from proxy to
> > backend, and have Managesieve still working. Is this supported?
>
> You'll n
Hello,
On a dovecot 2.0.14 proxy, I found that proxying managesieve works well
when using 'starttls' option in pass_attrs, but does not work when using
'ssl' option. The backend server is also dovecot 2.0.14; when using the
ssl option, it reports "no auth attempts" in the logs about
managesiev
Timo Sirainen writes:
>> In the first case there are *no* Return-Path and Delivered-To Headers.
>> In the (most common) second case the *are* present.
>> Why these Headers are not included while using the LMTP-Server?
I agree about the Return-Path missing, but the Delivered-To is
specific to Pos
Steffen Kaiser writes:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to make dovecot's deliver discard duplicate messages?
>
> No, currently not.
Ok.
> BTW: "if two copies of a message with the same message-id and the same
> envelope
Hello,
I am using dovecot 1.2.9, and the sieve plugin for filtering incoming
messages into specific folders. The MTA is postfix, and deliver is
called using the "mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver"
directive.
Is it possible to make dovecot's deliver discard duplicate messages?
With cyru
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 20:22 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>> I'm still somewhat reluctant to change to 1.2, because that would mean
>> that I cannot rely on my distros packages anymore (Etch that is for that
>> server) but must maintain the packages myself. Well...
>
> How
Daniel Spannbauer writes:
> my ~.muttrc is completly empty. But in my globnal /etc/Muttrc there
> are some configs.
IMHO, there is a script somewhere in your configuration generating the
list of mailboxes, and it generates it wrong, probably because it
thinks that the maildir structure is of the
Daniel Spannbauer writes:
> Hmm, I log in with mutt over the dovecot imap, so a "c" shows exactly:
>
>
> 1 0 imap://d...@homedirs/
>
> 2 0 imap://d...@homedirs/.ADMIN
> 3 0 imap://d...@homedi
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jonathan wrote:
> So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or cross
> platform and it needs to have decent key bindings because (probably like many
> of you) I get 100s of emails a day via lists and anything that speeds my way
> through them is good
Robert Schetterer writes:
> sorry for the stupid question what is "DAS"
> do you have a link etc for it, to get more info
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-attached_storage
--
Nicolas
Claude Gélinas writes:
> I've installed dovecot with maildir format in /home/claude/mail.
> I fetch my email with fetchmail and they are placed in
> /var/spool/mail/claude.
>
> How can I transfer them automatically in /home/claude/mail/INBOX/new
>
> How can I setup something to transfer my email
Stephan Bosch writes:
> Yep, that's the current status unfortunately. The build server runs
> Debian testing and that won't install directly on stable.
[...]
> Eventually I should build an automated sbuild environment to make the
> binaries available to more Debian/Ubuntu releases.
If you have
Nicolas KOWALSKI writes:
> Robert Schetterer writes:
>
>> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ experimental-auto main
Oops, I am not using experimental-auto source package, but the
testing-auto one in my /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb-src http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto main
--
Nicolas
Robert Schetterer writes:
> Hi, i used to use
Hello,
> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ experimental-auto main
> to update dovecot 1.2 with ubuntu horde
>
> didnt done for a time
> now i get
> broken deps with apt
I encountered the same problem with Debian Lenny, so I now recompile
the package m
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:44:44PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>
>>>> Yes, dovecot find the mails in INBOX from ~/Maildir/.INBOX . The
>>>> deliver
>>>> tool also stores incoming mail in this fo
Congratulations Timo!
I wish you the best in this new work and home :-)
--
Nicolas
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 21:50 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:15:17PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directorie
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:15:17PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directories in ~/Maildir, as written
> > in the wiki, but instead this .INBOX directory which contains these
> > 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp'.
> >
> > Is this expected ? Thanks.
>
> No, it's not exp
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:32:41AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI schrieb:
> > There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directories in ~/Maildir, as written
> > in the wiki, but instead this .INBOX directory which contains these
> >
Hello,
About the INBOX location when using maildir, in the wiki,
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, I can read:
"
Directory Structure
~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain
the messages for INBOX. The tmp directory is used during delivery, new
messages
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:43:02AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> In my mind, there should be two primary date/time columns:
>
> Sent Date/Time = Date/time of the Client system when message was sent
> (this is already there as the plain 'Date' column)
>
> and
>
> Received Date/Time = Date/time t
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:25:38AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I suppose the OP does not sort by date but Arrival time (this means
> > arrival time in the mailbox).
>
> It was my understanding that arrival
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:00:22AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > - this is not specific to INBOX: when saving a message from a folder to
> > the same folder, Alpine complaints with the message
> > [Can
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:09:57AM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:34:03AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jonathan Herbach wrote:
> >
> >> I've noticed a change since Dovecot was upgraded. I used to reorder
> >
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:34:03AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jonathan Herbach wrote:
>
>> I've noticed a change since Dovecot was upgraded. I used to reorder
>> items within my INBOX in al/pine by "saving" messages back to the
>> INBOX, which I was connecting via IMAP
>
George Mamalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is as follows:
>Is there a way to call spamc from dovecot-LDA (and/or
> dovecot-sieve), or is there an alternate way to do this for a site
> with virtual mailboxes configured with dovecot-lda?
Hello,
I am currently running a simil
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 11:30 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>>
>> As I understand it, this makes the mbox format of dovecot slightly
>> incompatible with other mbox-capable clients, because if they read
>> the data file
Hello,
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox) about
"From Escaping":
"Dovecot doesn't currently do this escaping however. Instead it
prevents this confusion by adding Content-Length headers so it knows
later where the next message begins. Dovecot doesn't either remove the
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 12:06 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>
> > When a message is copied or newly-delivered to a folder, it does not
> > have the "recent" flag set. Is there something in the configuration
> > to
Hello,
When a message is copied or newly-delivered to a folder, it does not
have the "recent" flag set. Is there something in the configuration to
activate it ?
Thanks.
# dovecot -n
# 1.0.9: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imap
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable: /usr/lo
Nicolas KOWALSKI petole.dyndns.org> writes:
> I have a rather large (~400MB) INBOX file in mbox format. When using
> deliver, it complains in the logs:
>
> Dec 2 16:47:13 petole deliver(niko): write() failed with mbox file
/home/niko/mail/INBOX: File too large
This has not
Hello,
I have a rather large (~400MB) INBOX file in mbox format. When using
deliver, it complains in the logs:
Dec 2 16:47:13 petole deliver(niko): write() failed with mbox file
/home/niko/mail/INBOX: File too large
I do not see anything related in the configuration. And ulimit shows
nothing
On 6/29/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just remember that if you lose the index files there's no easy way to
> recover the mailbox. Well, except by copying the files to maildir..
>
> I'm not sure if I should try to make cydir anything else than a
> benchmark format or a simple ex
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 21:49 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 20:26 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> >> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL P
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 20:26 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The upcoming dbox and cydir formats of course beat everything in
>> > performance :)
>&g
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The upcoming dbox and cydir formats of course beat everything in
> performance :)
cydir ? Does this mean there is a cyrus-like storage coming soon ?
--
Nicolas
43 matches
Mail list logo
