dovecot 2 samba ad-dc

trol: 66048 pwdLastSet: 132240938772523690 lastLogonTimestamp: 132263319652676310 whenChanged: 20200216130605.0Z uSNChanged: 7935 distinguishedName: CN=DovecotAdministrator,OU=ServiceAccounts,OU=Identitiy,DC=  test,DC=loc # search result search: 2 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 3 # numEntries: 2 Can someone give me a hint? Best Phil

Re: regarding ssl certificates

On 3/14/19 10:08 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: Some facts for you, as obviously you have not understood what a CA is worth that is compromised by either hackers or "authorities". If you want to know more, read articles about closing of CA DigiNotar, like: https://en.wikipedia.or

Re: regarding ssl certificates

CSR in no way exposes keys to that CA, and therefore not to any government. While there are weakness in the CA trust system, they aren't anything related to replacing a snakeoil cert with one from Let's Encrypt. [rest of ignorant rant trimmed] Phil

Re: Migrate Mail Data from Dovecot to Dovecot

uestion in a NEW message, not a reply to another, unrelated thread. The type of people who are likely to know the answer are also likely to use threaded mail-readers, and will therefore not see your message. Phil

Re: Upgrade to 2.3.1 has failed

time. I have forwarded my latest to Aki to the > group. Regards, Phil

Re: Mailing list address harvested for spamming

specially if requested by the list owner? Phil

Re: Bug: 'noreplicate' database extra field ingnored

On 22 Oct 2018, at 8:08, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 20.10.2018 7.29, Phil wrote: The 'noreplicate' user database field described in the wiki appears to make no difference as to whether an account gets replicated or not. My sql user query returns a 'noreplicate' field and I can co

Bug: 'noreplicate' database extra field ingnored

The 'noreplicate' user database field described in the wiki appears to make no difference as to whether an account gets replicated or not. My sql user query returns a 'noreplicate' field and I can confirm that this is getting set using 'doveadm user', however when I add a new account with norepl

Replication 'noreplicate' field usage

I've set up replication as per the wiki under 2.3.3 and in my SQL user query I am returning a 'noreplicate' field, this is a boolean and returns true for all users at the moment. However when I do "doveadm replicator status '*'" it lists all users in my database suggesting it is trying to sync

Re: Dovecot book available again

ton . . . Personally i don't want a physical book at all :/ Regards, Phil signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

On 26/06/2016 4:50 PM, Peer Heinlein wrote: > Am 25.06.2016 um 21:52 schrieb "Jan Büren": > > >>> I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months, >>> prior to starting this project. So far, I just can't find a copy. It's >>> too >>> bad that the author/publisher won'

Re: Dovecot rest api

+1 - me too. In my case, I'm looking for a way to do webmail without imap since the web interface wants external auth via SAML. On 2 Apr 2016 05:54, "use experience" wrote: > Team, > > Need more information on dovecot rest api. Any detailed information about > list of dovecot rest apis other than

Re: Migrating to dovecot from gmail apps

Many thanks for the replies, I'm going to take a look at OX. Out of curiousity, does anyone know if Open-Xchange is primarily German or American? I'm trying to favour European projects/products as I've realised too much the tech I use is reliant on the US. Phil On Mon, Mar 28,

Migrating to dovecot from gmail apps

dea of using lucene indexing on mailboxes, so reducing the number of dependencies has a certain appeal. Best wishes, Phil Lello

Re: Send Dovecot logs to rsyslog

used. Dovecot's use of syslog is very vanilla, there's not much room for it to do much wrong. Phil > 2016-02-06 16:44 GMT+01:00 Oscar del Rio : > > On 05/02/2016 9:42 AM, Nicolas Fo wrote: > >> I set in dovecot.conf : syslog_facility = local5.info > > > >

Re: Strange indexing behavior on HTML emails ..

es, unfortunately, it does. Phil

Re: Strange indexing behavior on HTML emails ..

xistence > of this issue? Thanks for the report. Bug found. My bad. A patch is working its way through the internal process, and will be in the public tree soon. Cheers, Phil

Re: distuguish between different domains

b or otherwise authenticating against real users of the system. If you are using virtual users (SQL, LDAP, etc.), you can include the domain name in the auth lookups. Phil

Re: dovecot-2.2.16 compilation problems under Solaris Studio 11

, for the sake of -Werror and other static code analysis tools, a patch will very soon be in the dovecot.org tree. Phil

Re: v2.2.15 released

D; That is the correct fix. C is quirky about labels, you can only label statements, nothing else. As Timo mentioned, the t_push()/t_pop() interface hasn't been the recommended interface since about 2008, so this definitely is the correct way to go. If upstream is out there somewhere, for your patch: Acked-by: Phil Carmody Phil

Re: Master user and invalid credentials dovecot-2.2.13

th/password-scheme.c#0805 0805 static const struct password_scheme builtin_schemes[] = { ... 0810 { "SHA", PW_ENCODING_BASE64, SHA1_RESULTLEN, NULL, sha1_generate }, 0811 { "SHA1", PW_ENCODING_BASE64, SHA1_RESULTLEN, NULL, sha1_generate }, Phil

Re: [wishlist] testsuite for sieve scripts, libsievetest

asier, in particular if you set up a few aliases for the common sequences of tasks. $ hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2 $ git clone "hg::/home/phil/dovecot-2.2" dovecot-2.2-git $ cd dovecot-2.2-git $ git checkout -b hacking $ # work... $ cd ../dovecot-2.2 $ hg

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot -n FATAL

on 6/02/2014 11:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 06.02.2014 09:29, schrieb Phil: On 6/02/2014 6:23 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: You show us the symbolic link, which has all Unix permissions usually. The interessting file is the final target, e.g. /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key if that is

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot -n FATAL

On 6/02/2014 7:36 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Phil wrote: :~$ dovecot -n which user do you use to invoke doveconf? From now on root :-) Thanks for your help Steffen. - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot -n FATAL

On 6/02/2014 7:33 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: On 02/06/2014 09:29 AM, Phil wrote: On 6/02/2014 6:23 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Phil wrote: Im new to postfix-dovecot and Unix/Linux, too? Technically yes! Less than 2 years

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot -n FATAL

On 6/02/2014 6:23 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Phil wrote: Im new to postfix-dovecot and Unix/Linux, too? Technically yes! Less than 2 years experience running a live server . . . and im mystified by

[Dovecot] dovecot -n FATAL

an i fix this problem so i can run dovecot -n successfully. i have tried 'chown dovecot' etc but there was no change in dovecot -n output. Any and all help is appreciated. Phil

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot with sasl/imaps/postfix and thunderbird

; "Options..." to get to TB's configuration pages. There, use "Advanced" -> "Certificates" -> "View Certificates" -> "Servers" and finally "Import..." After you've imported the needed cert, you can re-open the wizard with "Create new account". You can also use this method to import a self-signed certificate authority if you want to run your own signing operation. Phil

[Dovecot] No NTLM with PAM after upgrade

After updating From Dovecot 1.07 (included with CentOS 5) to 2.11, NTLM authentication will not work. Attempts to authenticate against Samba version 4.0.4-GIT-20cb7de also fail with 'auth: Info: winbind(?,192.168.2.100): user not authenticated: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL', despite the fact that the sa

Re: [Dovecot] Anyone else seeing lots of random duplicate messages???

On 09/04/2012 12:40 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-09-04 12:37 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: >> Almost every message I'm getting through this list is duplicated, down >> to the same exact message-ID... >> >> Anyone else seeing this? > > Even this one was duplicated... Not here :-) Phil

[Dovecot] (no subject)

Hey All, I'm developing a site on a VPS that comes stock with dovecot 1.2.17 and I'm trying to setup some functionality that is very specific to our business model. My question is this: How do I create (programatically) aliases for a forwarder? I have an address, em...@domain.com that gets sent

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

ffer. The content is entirely appropriate, and appreciated. Don't be embarrassed by your enthusiasm, Stan. Sven, a follow-up report when you have it all working as desired would also be appreciated (and appropriate). Thanks, Phil

[Dovecot] Attribute Cache flush errors on FreeBSD 8.2

same error either way. The output of dovecot -n is below. Phil. # 2.0.16: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 i386 auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_username_format = %Lu disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_gid = 1000 first_valid_uid = 1000 listen = *, [::]

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

e command you want is "VBoxManage internalcommands createrawvmdk" On the other hand, if the host and the guest need simultaneous access, you will need some form of network filesystem. HTH, Phil

Re: [Dovecot] Change passwd backend over cron: what happens if changes while reading?

atomically replace the old version with the update. If dovecot has the file open when you do this, it will carry on with the prior copy (delete will be deferred until the file is closed). Dovecot will see the changes the next time it opens the file. > > cu denny HTH, Phil

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] On-delivery deduplication?

On 06/08/2011 07:05 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 09/06/11 00:47, Phil Turmel wrote: >> On 06/08/2011 05:58 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: [...] >>> >>> The point is that when you set the headers correctly on your >>> message, a reply from someone on your message will

Re: [Dovecot] On-delivery deduplication?

e on open mail lists, like those at kernel.org, where "reply-to-all" is expected of participants. Phil

Re: [Dovecot] case (non-)sensitivity for folder names

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 16:10, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 5.1.2011, at 23.04, Phil Howard wrote: > >> But if for INBOX names are case IN-sensitive, then there will be >> confusion because anything obeying that concept would see "Inbox >> >> spam" and "I

Re: [Dovecot] case (non-)sensitivity for folder names

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 13:20, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 5.1.2011, at 19.33, Phil Howard wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:05, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 10:09 -0500, Phil Howard wrote: >>>> Is IMAP supposed to be case sensitive or case in-

Re: [Dovecot] case (non-)sensitivity for folder names

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:05, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 10:09 -0500, Phil Howard wrote: >> Is IMAP supposed to be case sensitive or case in-sensitive? > > Case sensitive, except for INBOX. (Or if the server is using > case-insensitive filesystem then they&#

[Dovecot] case (non-)sensitivity for folder names

Is IMAP supposed to be case sensitive or case in-sensitive? It seemed it would be case sensitive because I've had different cases of folders. But today I found I had two folders "Spam" and "spam", with directories ".INBOX.Spam" and ".INBOX.spam" on the server. Messages existed in each directory

[Dovecot] re-indexing moved mail

I have a huge block of email that was misdelivered into the wrong folder. Moving it where it should be is not just all from one folder to being all of another folder. Basically, the index files need to be rebuilt. Looking in the wiki I cannot find how to do this. It all seems to be about instal

Re: [Dovecot] Is this really a user agent issue?

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 17:08, Willie Gillespie wrote: > Phil Howard wrote: >> >> I think this issue has been entirely misunderstood.  Have I explained it >> wrong? > > I think there's been a bit of confusion here.  Everyone is saying similar > things in sl

Re: [Dovecot] Is this really a user agent issue?

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-12-23 10:27 AM, David Warden wrote: >> I know Thunderbird can be difficult when it comes to new folders showing >> up on the server that it didn't create. > > Main reason I always uncheck the 'show only subscribed folders' option > in

Re: [Dovecot] Is this really a user agent issue?

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:27, David Warden wrote: > Out of curiosity, are you using the "autosubscribe" feature of Dovecot LDA > to automatically subscribe people who whatever new folder the Dovecot LDA > automatically creates? It looks like this is the -s flag to LDA binary in > 1.1.3+ or lda_ma

Re: [Dovecot] Is this really a user agent issue?

I think this issue has been entirely misunderstood. Have I explained it wrong? 2010/12/22 Karsten Bräckelmann : > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 09:34 -0500, Phil Howard wrote: >> 2010/12/21 Karsten Bräckelmann : >> >> > Creating the new mail folder is entirely on the IMAP s

Re: [Dovecot] trying to make cmusieve happen globally

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 13:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 22-12-2010 19:12, Phil Howard schreef: >> Do I need to have per-user sieves set up, too, just to get it to work? > > No. I did some debugging. It looks like I do need to h

Re: [Dovecot] trying to make cmusieve happen globally

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 13:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 22-12-2010 19:12, Phil Howard schreef: >> >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:46, Anton Dollmaier >>  wrote: >> >>>> plugin { >>>>         sieve_global_path = /etc/dovecot/sieve-global.d/

Re: [Dovecot] trying to make cmusieve happen globally

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 13:27, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > May be a good idea to post some snippets of the actual Postfix delivery > attempts just to make sure it really uses the external LDA. You can also > crank up 'mail_debug = yes' to log more verbosely. IIRC it should show CMU > Sieve warning

Re: [Dovecot] trying to make cmusieve happen globally

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 13:12, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 22-12-2010 17:46, Anton Dollmaier schreef: >>> plugin { >>>         sieve_global_path = /etc/dovecot/sieve-global.d/spam.sieve >> >> Use "sieve_before", which is not documented in the wiki. > > Eh.. no. CMUSieve does not have multiscript su

Re: [Dovecot] trying to make cmusieve happen globally

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:46, Anton Dollmaier wrote: >> plugin { >>         sieve_global_path = /etc/dovecot/sieve-global.d/spam.sieve > > Use "sieve_before", which is not documented in the wiki. Changed. > > Only this way the sievescript really gets executed. > > > The global path requires a

[Dovecot] trying to make cmusieve happen globally

In Dovecot 1.1.11 cmusieve is apparently integrated in the Ubuntu 9.10 package "dovecot-common" since the files are there. I am wanting to right now just do a very basic test of the setup to see how it runs before doing more sophisticated steps that could obscure any errors or bugs (e.g. unit test

Re: [Dovecot] Is this really a user agent issue?

2010/12/21 Karsten Bräckelmann : > Creating the new mail folder is entirely on the IMAP server side. The > MUA (Evolution in your stated case) is irrelevant. If the creation of > the new folder fails, it is a server side problem. > > However, once a new folder has been created (server side, mind y

Re: [Dovecot] Moving email between folders outside of IMAP context

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 17:41, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > That software is already written and tested, it is the sieve plugin. If > you're willing to write, test and run a complete new piece of software, > you might as well replace dovecot with a sieve enabled version of the > same package you're runn

Re: [Dovecot] Moving email between folders outside of IMAP context

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 17:09, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > I am not familiar with Ubuntu specifics, but iirc Stephan Bosch (creator > of sieve plugin) has a repo with debian builds of dovecot+sieve. I would need something that is sieve only, as Dovecot is already installed, configured, and running. I

Re: [Dovecot] Moving email between folders outside of IMAP context

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 16:41, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > Do not use an external script, but add a global sieve script that sorts > messages into some directory, based on your preferred header. How does that get executed. I take it I can't do it via cron. Does it run at deliver time for each mail m

[Dovecot] Moving email between folders outside of IMAP context

I'd like to run a script from cron that will scan certain mailboxes and move selected mail from one folder (usually INBOX) to another folder. The basic idea is to move previously detected spam based on headers prepended to the mail. Since I am not able to figure out how to get Postfix to invoke d

[Dovecot] Is this really a user agent issue?

I suspect this is a user agent issue, given that Evolution is flaky in so many areas. When I deliver mail to a subfolder/subbox (e.g. the -m option in the deliver command), and Evolution doesn't know of it, yet, creating it fails, and Evolution still can't get to it. Doing things the other way ar

Re: [Dovecot] restricting access by reverse domain name

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:18, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 10:55 -0400, Phil Howard wrote: >> Is there a feature or plugin to restrict access to IMAP/POP service by >> the domain name in reverse lookup? > > With v2.0 you could use tcp-wrappers. > >> I

[Dovecot] restricting access by reverse domain name

Is there a feature or plugin to restrict access to IMAP/POP service by the domain name in reverse lookup? It would be even better if this restriction can exclude certain users (e.g. some users can access IMAP from certain networks but other users cannot). -- sHiFt HaPpEnS!

Re: [Dovecot] "listen=*, ::" broken?

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 09:56, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > This is not true for my linux distro at least, which does not listen on > ipv4 interface when setting "listen = [::]" (in dovecot 1.2.13). > > I need "listen = *, [::]" to enable support for both ipv4 and ipv6. This > sounds like some distro spe

Re: [Dovecot] "listen=*, ::" broken?

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:47, Peer Heinlein wrote: > the default: > > listen = *, :: > > should work and should open port 143 on IPv4 and IPv6. On Linux, listening to :: in IPv6 has the effect of listening also on 0.0.0.0 in IPv4, even though only a single socket is involved. If the process bin

Re: [Dovecot] Ok, I've given up

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 17:49, Steinar Bang wrote: >>>>>> Phil Howard : > >> I abandoned sendmail many years ago and haven't looked back.  I tried >> qmail and postfix, and was a lot happier with postfix.  I overlooked >> exim at the time, but from what

Re: [Dovecot] expire

Looks like a newer version that I can't help on. Should be plenty others around at some point. -- sHiFt HaPpEnS!

Re: [Dovecot] OT: Sieve + Forward as Attachment

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 13:11, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:55:04 -0400 > Charles Marcus articulated: > >> Maybe, but that's not how I read it... only the OP can clarify... > > I thought it was clear; however, I guess not. > > Now, I all ready know in advance that certain messages that I

Re: [Dovecot] expire

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:35, Papp Tamás wrote: > /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool.sh Is it a script? I'm on Ubuntu 9.10 with Dovecot 1.1.11 and there is no /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool.sh though there is a /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool file which is an executable binary. marconi/root/x0 /root 381#

Re: [Dovecot] OT: Sieve + Forward as Attachment

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:45, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-07-06 7:25 AM, Jerry wrote: >> I know that this is technically not a Dovecot problem; however, I was >> wondering if anyone knew if 'sieve' had been updated with the ability >> to 'forward as attachment' a received document. I believe i

Re: [Dovecot] address extension going into folder

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:56, Edgar Fuß wrote: >> But it (-n) will deliver (rather than reject) into the regular INBOX >> if the folder for the extension does not exist? > Yes, but isn't that what you were asking for? Yes, but your statement was about what you did, and I wasn't sure if your needs

Re: [Dovecot] address extension going into folder

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:47, Edgar Fuß wrote: > With Postfix, I use > mailbox_command = DOVECOT_LDA -n -e -m "${EXTENSION}" > where DOVECOT_LDA is the path do dovecot's deliver. The -n switch prevents > creation of the IMAP folder. > See http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA But it (-n) will deliver (rat

[Dovecot] address extension going into folder

Is it possible with a simple config change to make address extensions, e.g. alice+sa...@example.com, go into a folder, e.g. .INBOX.sales, and do so ONLY if that folder already exists (and just go into INBOX if it does not exist)?

Re: [Dovecot] system v. virtual mailboxes, was Re: Thunderbird problem

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:28, Frank Cusack wrote: > On 6/30/10 6:11 PM -0400 Charles Marcus wrote: >> >> That's just plain silly. Virtual users are extremely simple to setup, no >> need for MySQL unless you have a bunch. > > I agree. I am always in favor of virtual users, it just gives you a lot >

Re: [Dovecot] system v. virtual mailboxes, was Re: Thunderbird problem

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 16:16, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:28:52AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2010-06-28 9:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> > I guess this is different with virtual users than with system >> > users?  Are you using virtual or system users Charles? >> >> Virt

Re: [Dovecot] %d/%n doesn't work... why?

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:32, William Ottley wrote: > I have attempted to force dovecot to put into a sub directly, without using > the %d, but that doesn't work either: > #mail_location = mbox:/var/vmail/%d/%n > mail_location = mbox:/var/vmail/pplsnet.com/%n I wonder if you are trying to do so

Re: [Dovecot] Ok, I've given up

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 04:46, Chuck McManis wrote: > So SMTP hasn't changed much in 30 years ;-) I'd be interested in what you > consider a 'modern' MTA. I've looked pretty thoroughly at sendmail, postfix, > and qmail and of the three qmail is fairly reliable. Not sure what makes a > particular

Re: [Dovecot] Logout after SSL/TLS negociation

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:42, bmfr wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for your reply, I'm using a thrid party IMAP client (can not disclose > its name) and testing with other IMAP clients work. I'm wondering if you had > an idea of what could trigger this LOGOUT msg from

Re: [Dovecot] Logout after SSL/TLS negociation

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:22, bmfr wrote: > I've set up Dovecot to use my signed SSL certificate and IMAP client is > using STARTTLS on port 143 without secure authentication. > > The TLS negociation process seems to go through ok but once the negociation > is finished the client sends an IMAP L

Re: [Dovecot] Mail Stuck in cur file

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 17:19, jason hirsh wrote: > I am running dovecot 1.1.7  with postfix 2.6.5.  Ihad a server down issue and > when it rebooted the IPFW firewalll on my FReebsd server prevented mail from > being delivered..at least thatis what I think the issue was... when i stopped > IPFW

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.1.x and 1.2.x differencies

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:30, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Quoting Veiko Kukk : > >> I prefer "don't fix if it isn't broken" philosophy. > > Reasonable, as long as the version you are running is still supported... And if it isn't, you should upgrade. But when? Immediately? Or later when an issue c

[Dovecot] passwd-file management utility

I'm now putting together tools/documentation to manage/administer the mail server, including, of course, managing users. Round one will be command line tools. In order to avoid re-invention, I was looking around for existing tools. I really cannot find any. So it seems I will be developing them

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.1.x and 1.2.x differencies

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 07:43, Veiko Kukk wrote: > Hello, > > I have been using successfully Dovecot 1.1.x for about a year now. It has > been very stable. > Now I'm uprading that same system to newer and more powerful hardware and I > was wondering whether it is good idea or not to switch to Dove

Re: [Dovecot] "failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX': Not enough disk space." with large mail

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 23:06, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Charles Marcus put forth on 6/10/2010 10:19 AM: >> On 2010-06-10 3:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> BTW, anyone who has a 44MB INBOX should be slapped repeatedly about the >>> cranium and then educated about POP and IMAP, and how each should be

Re: [Dovecot] "failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX': Not enough disk space." with large mail

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:54, Jakob Curdes wrote: > > > Am 10.06.2010 17:19, schrieb Charles Marcus: >> >> On 2010-06-10 3:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> >>> >>> BTW, anyone who has a 44MB INBOX should be slapped repeatedly about the >>> cranium and then educated about POP and IMAP, and how each

Re: [Dovecot] Evolution and Thunderbird do different things?

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 14:02, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > Flags was actually the wrong phrase, the correct term is IMAP keywords. > The way that Dovecot handles this internally, is described in > http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir . > > But it has no use to investigate the inner workings of

Re: [Dovecot] Evolution and Thunderbird do different things?

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:07, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > The IMAP protocol does not define folder names and such. Servers and > clients only know how to create/remove/rename/relocate folders and > files, and some other basics. The names that are used by default, is a > choice of the user (mostly the d

[Dovecot] Evolution and Thunderbird do different things?

I'm trying both Evolution and Thunderbird on my IMAP server, and find that there are differences in how some things are done, between clients. Shouldn't there have been a standard way to do these things in the IMAP protocol? The first thing I noticed is that when deleting email from one client, i

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

use > 'deliver -m' for this. However, when I set up deliver like this in > postfix , I get the following results that I did > not expect when the argument for '-m' was a null string: omitted>. > > Hi phil, could you try ?. Also, when you do this > , you'l

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 02:39, Rainer Frey wrote: > On Tuesday 01 June 2010 17:01:16 Phil Howard wrote: >> I cannot determine how deliver with an empty string give to -m would >> behave. > > This is just what I mean: the behavior of deliver -m has absolutely nothing to > d

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 14:56, Frank Cusack wrote: > Man oh man.  You don't have much experience with mail and it sounds > like you are starting from scratch.  You have your work cut out for > you. :) Well, actually I do. A lot of it is way way back there with sendmail. Back then I coded sendma

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 14:45, Frank Cusack wrote: > On 6/1/10 2:10 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog wrote: >> >>> This might be helpful: >>> >>>  http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/ >> >> Right no

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog wrote: > This might be helpful: > >  http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/ Right now only time for a quick look. Looks like yet another server with yet another protocol (via port 4190), rather than integrated into IMAP as an extension. I'm doubting all my em

Re: [Dovecot] Intermittent timeout issues

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:58, Del Stoliker wrote: > It almost sounds like the firewall is blocking external access except that: > * The version of dovecot was the thing that changed > * Everything starts working again after a dovecot restart It sounds like the firewall is doing something to the

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:07, Gerhard Waldemair wrote: >> Is there à GUI for sieve. >> >> I don't have installed Squrielmail, but won't like to manage the Rules per >> ssh I would hope there would be a way to put Sieve scripts in place via IMAP itself. Otherwise I won't be able to do that on my

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:41, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Law firm or heavily FED GOV regulated industry?  Or just HUA (head up ass) > management with zero understanding of email and spam? People dealing with a large variety of outside clients and potential clients where bouncing THEIR mail gives bad

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:55, William Blunn wrote: > "The Dovecot Sieve plugin provides mail filtering facilities at time of > final message delivery using the Sieve (RFC 5228 > ) language." > > "Sieve is implemented as a plugin to deliver

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:17, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Phil Howard put forth on 6/1/2010 9:15 AM: >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:04, Jerry wrote: >> >>> The fight against SPAM is NOT Dovecots responsibility. >> >> Whose responsibility is it to get detected spam

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:01, William Blunn wrote: > Get your anti-spam software to add header records to the messages, then use > Dovecot LDA Sieve to filter based on those header records. So I can run Sieve as part of the deliver? Or does it run soon after that?

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:45, Rainer Frey wrote: > I guess you'll have the mental transfer of "fight spam" into "cause dovecot to > perform this and that action" yourself. The possible actions are, in general, > documented. I cannot determine how deliver with an empty string give to -m would beh

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:21, Frank Elsner wrote: > Ok, you obviously have a different environment and requirements. > > - I do the delivery into special folder by the MTA (exim) and the LDA is >  not used at all. > > - detection training is not done. > > > Sorry, my world may be to narrow :-) E

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:04, Jerry wrote: > The fight against SPAM is NOT Dovecots responsibility. Whose responsibility is it to get detected spam delivered into the correct folder? Dovecot deliver is typically used to deliver into the Inbox(es). It would be involved. Note that I am not sayi

Re: [Dovecot] recipient_delimiter

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:56, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-06-01 8:39 AM, Phil Howard wrote: >> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 17:30, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> Of course it is meant for people, but it is meant to show only the >>> bare minimum of what postfix sees as the

  1   2   3   >