On Mar 23, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> :2012-03-22T11:55:Noel Butler:
>>>
perhaps it should be renamed then, given it violates the known normal
for SYSCONF dir, you've just created another form of --datadir
>>>
>>> Not really. The way I see it works as expected.
>>
>>
> On 29.11.2011, at 08:19, Rainer Frey wrote:
>> I'm wondering about the authentication listeners that dovecot uses. In many
>> configurations I see:
>> service auth {
>> unix_listener auth-userdb {
>>
>> Does any component of dovecot use this list
On 29.11.2011, at 08:19, Rainer Frey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering about the authentication listeners that dovecot uses. In many
> configurations I see:
> service auth {
> unix_listener auth-userdb {
>
> Does any component of dovecot use this listener internall
Hi,
I'm wondering about the authentication listeners that dovecot uses. In many
configurations I see:
service auth {
unix_listener auth-userdb {
Does any component of dovecot use this listener internally (lmtp, lda ...) and
does that read the config and search for the listener, or is the exact
On 28.09.2011, at 00:14, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
> Hello Patrick,
>
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:06 PM, "Patrick Domack"
> wrote:
>> Using dovecot lda/lmtp you remove all postfix needs to know mailbox
>> name to directory mapping, that would be duplicated.
>
> With using the Doveco
On 11.07.2011, at 17:03, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The R410 is a two socket Xeon box with max 2 x 6 core CPUs. The 24 CPUs
> you see is the result of HyperThreading being enabled. I'd disable HT
> if I were you, or those boxen mine.
Why?
Rainer
On Wednesday 08 September 2010 16:11:43 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 14:00 +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > > The problem is that all logging goes through log process, which
> > > currently only supports a single logging destination. But .. I think
> > &g
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 16:21:35 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:23 +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > protocol lmtp {
> >
> > syslog_facility = mail
> >
> > }
> >
> > but this has no effect, LMTP logs to local0. Is this sup
Hi,
I'm using Dovecot 2.0.1, and I log to a custom syslog facility (local0) in the
main configuration (I want a separate log file, but I want to make use of
rsyslogd's capabilities). I overwrite the syslog facility for LDA (mail) to
have all delivery related stuff in /var/log/mail.log, and tha
On Tuesday 24 August 2010 16:57:23 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I've noticed that a lot of people are using e.g.:
>
> mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n
>
> Then either they don't have home directory set, or their home directory
> is the same as the maildir. http://wiki.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers/H
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 17:01:16 Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:45, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > I guess you'll have the mental transfer of "fight spam" into "cause
> > dovecot to perform this and that action" yourself. The possible actions
> &
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 20:55:52 Phil Howard wrote:
> wrote:
> > On 6/1/10 2:10 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog wrote:
> >>> This might be helpful:
> >>>
> >>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/
> >>
> >> Right now only time for a quick look. Looks like
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 20:10:08 Phil Howard wrote:
> Looks like I will need to do a lot of reading on Sieve and ManageSieve
> to be sure it's safe. For one thing, I want to turn the vacation
> feature off unless it can cross check a list of valid senders (user
> contacts).
No need to turn it off
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 15:42:18 Phil Howard wrote:
> I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
> features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
> search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
> (e.g. TextCHAs and such).
I guess
On Thursday 22 April 2010 18:15:18 Phil Howard wrote:
[ ... all standard stuff that is well documented ... ]
> 5. Passwords stored encrypted, such as MD5. And it should be a scheme
> that both Postfix and Dovecot can use so I don't have keep two different
> encryption schemes.
Postfix doesn't n
On Thursday 22 April 2010 16:36:33 Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:12:24PM +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > Do you define all valid recipients there (e.g. in you example virtual
> > file lo...@domain.tld)?
>
> Yes.
So a valid recipient must be in the p
On Thursday 22 April 2010 15:34:40 Phil Howard wrote:
> So what would local_recipient_maps look like in this case?
As the suggested setup uses virtual_mailbox_domains for the mailboxes hosted
by dovecot, it would be virtual_mailbox_maps. Alternatively one could define
relay_domains, relay_tran
Please honour the Reply-To header next time. Thanks.
On Thursday 22 April 2010 11:42:01 Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > What I don't see here at all (and neither in your Wiki Howto) is how
> > Postfix determines the vali
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 21:30:12 Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> I'm running a setup that should be good enough for what you are trying to
> achieve. All user information is stored in flat files per domain and you
> may override per user settings individually:
>
> passdb {
> args = username_format=%u
Hi,
what is the quota plugin for deliver supposed to do when using fs quota?
With IMAP, and not using noenforcing, a user that is over Soft limit can't
copy mails.
With deliver, the mail is delivered normally. When hard limit is exceeded,
there is an error "rejected: Not enough disk space", ju
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 15:32:42 Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> > > 1) User logs in to imap from 192.168.0.1. What is foo's value?
> > >
> > > protocol imap {
> > > remote_ip 192.168.0.0/16 {
> > > foo = foo
> > > }
> > > }
> > > remote_ip 192.168.0.0/24 {
> > > foo = bar
> > > }
> >
> > Th
On Monday 10 August 2009 19:57:53 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how exactly v2.0 should be parsing
> configuration files. The most annoying part is if it should always just
> "use whatever comes first in config" or try some kind of a "use most
> specific rule".
I generally prefe
On Monday 27 July 2009 16:21:53 Stephan Bosch wrote:
> > or Use any of the packages from:
> > Dovecot v1.2 for Debian Testing (binary and source):
> >
> > deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-1.2 main
> > deb-src http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-1.2 main
> > -
On Thursday 16 July 2009 15:38:25 Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 7/16/2009 9:16 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> >> I'm using GMAIL style saving sent items automatically, so email don't
> >> send twice to server. First when sending via smtp, second when MUA
> >> saving it to IMAP s
Hi,
I'm a bit confused by the Wiki. Do the settings "sieve_dir"
and "sieve_global_dir" belong to the lda or the plugin section (Dovecot
1.1.11)?
Thanks
Rainer
want to consider though: your clients need to import the client cert
you issue, and your root CA certificate as trusted cert. If *all your SSL/TLS
clients* also get a client cert, you can also issue the server cert yourself,
a commercial cert provides no extra value in that case.
> Thanks
R
On Thursday 19 April 2007 02:23:46 Peter Abrahamsen wrote:
> Good day, all,
>
> I've gleaned that dovecot has support for verifying SSL client certs on
> connect. What IMAP clients have people found that support sending a
> specific SSL cert? I can't find this feature in Thunderbird, at least.
Thu
27 matches
Mail list logo
