Re: [Dovecot] Busy looping of 2.0Beta4 on NetBSD-current

2010-05-26 Thread Scott Ellis
Yes, Beta5 (which has the zlib and bz fixes) works great. Thanks for following up! > Is this solved by now? (imap_zlib plugin bug?) > > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 19:47 -0700, Scott Ellis wrote: >> I built and install Dovecot 2.0Beta4 on my NetBSD/amd64-current system, >> and am

Re: [Dovecot] imap-zlib patch to fix runaway imap process

2010-04-21 Thread Scott Ellis
On 4/20/2010 5:19 PM, Mike Abbott wrote: Here is a patch to fix the problem where an imap process runs away when imap-zlib is in use. The backtrace showed: [snip] The patch seems to be working great on my NetBSD/amd64 system. Thanks for figuring it out Mike! ScottE

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.beta3 imapd running hot

2010-03-29 Thread Scott Ellis
[snip] > I am pretty sure it is related to imap_zlib ... at least this did not > happen when I disabled the plugin. > [snip] Your backtrace looks exactly like what I see on 2.0Beta4 on NetBSD, and I observed the same thing with respect to imap_zlib. I just can't find the smoking gun that links th

Re: [Dovecot] Busy looping of 2.0Beta4 on NetBSD-current

2010-03-27 Thread Scott Ellis
On 3/26/2010 10:05 AM, Scott Ellis wrote: On 26.3.2010, at 4.47, Scott Ellis wrote: But it's not hanging anyway, just eating all CPU? I guess it's calling some IO_WRITE callback all the time. You could make it do something like: Yeah, functionally the imap process seems to be just f

Re: [Dovecot] Busy looping of 2.0Beta4 on NetBSD-current

2010-03-26 Thread Scott Ellis
> On 26.3.2010, at 4.47, Scott Ellis wrote: > But it's not hanging anyway, just eating all CPU? I guess it's calling > some IO_WRITE callback all the time. You could make it do something like: Yeah, functionally the imap process seems to be just fine. It's just not being

[Dovecot] Busy looping of 2.0Beta4 on NetBSD-current

2010-03-25 Thread Scott Ellis
I built and install Dovecot 2.0Beta4 on my NetBSD/amd64-current system, and am seeing the user-owned imap processes busy-looping. In Dovecot 1.2.x (and 1.x and 0.x..) I force ionotify and ioloop to kqueue, so I suspected that was the problem. Turns out it's not: Using poll or none also causes

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta3 and dovecot.conf

2010-03-21 Thread Scott Ellis
On 3/21/2010 7:22 AM, Axel Luttgens wrote: [snip] for those looking for a quick workaround until a beta4 or a rc1 gets issued, [snip] Seems like there's a ton of changes post Beta3. Timo, can you roll up a quick Beta4 (or Beta3.1? :-) ), so we can get folks out of the ick that is Beta3?

[Dovecot] 2.0 beta 3 w/o libwrap?

2010-03-07 Thread Scott Ellis
I'm trying to kickstart 2.0b3 on my NetBSD system (where 1.2.x works great!), and keep hitting: Fatal: service(tcpwrap) access(/software/dovecot-2.0beta3/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory Indeed, that file doesn't exist...but I don't have nor want libwrap. It appea