>
> 2. I understand that I also have to instruct my MDA (procmail) to deliver mail
> to the new location. I found that I have to create an /etc/procmailrc with the
> following line:
>
>> DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
>
> My question is: Some users have their own .procmailrc file inside their home
> di
on 7/24/2012 7:51 AM Steve Platt spake the following:
> We have a user who wants to use Outlook with our Dovecot IMAP server but
> doesn't like the way Outlook handles deletion with IMAP.
>
> Ironically she would like Outlook to move the message to her Trash folder,
> just like Outlook does with "
on 6/26/2012 2:19 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:48 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
>>> I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
>>> and m
on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
> I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
> and mail is stored in a maildir. The wiki (see
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces) refers to this as "Mixed mbox and
> Maildir". It advises handling this situa
on 10/27/2011 12:52 PM Albert E. Whale spake the following:
I am transitioning an existing server from using exclusively mbox, to being
able to support both mbox and then fully maildir formats.
I need to support the mbox format until I can get everyone switched over to
maildir.
What do I need t
on 5/9/2011 2:13 AM Sarder Kamal spake the following:
> Dear Timo
>
> On 05/05/2011 17:18, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 5.5.2011, at 18.05, Sarder Kamal wrote:man doveadm-fetch
>> man doveadm-search-query
>>
>> example: doveadm fetch -u user 'uid text' mailbox INBOX body "hello world"
>>
> Thanks fo
on 5/5/2011 1:04 AM Becker, Ronny spake the following:
> Hello,
> I am using Dovecot 1.2.9 on a 32bit on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS.
>
> We got one user who uses folders in an "exessive" way. He has got 704
> subscribed folders. That means about nearly 3000 folders on the filesystem.
> Since ~ a week the
on 4/24/2011 9:53 PM Anshul Chauhan spake the following:
> i"m using dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 on CentOS 5.5, i'm getting freqent problem of
> recieving multiple copies of mails received from outside my domain. this
> problem comes with some users and not with all the users, maillog shows the
> same mail
on 4/20/2011 5:12 PM Murray Collingwood spake the following:
> Hi folks
>
> Setting up a new server, hence a few software packages have been upgraded /
> changed. On my old server (only 2 years old) I was using Dovecot and
> RoundCube (web mail app) and had a good experience so was keen to use t
on 4/18/2011 6:29 AM Michael Durket spake the following:
> Do the Outlook workarounds in Dovecot 1.x still apply to current versions of
> Outlook? Or has Microsoft fixed Outlook such that workarounds are no longer
> needed in Dovecot (and if so, after what version of Outlook can I remove the
> w
on 4/1/2011 8:15 PM ShepN spake the following:
>
> - Postfix is doing its job sending and receiving email. It puts the email
> in the unix user mailboxes (MBOX).
> - My Outlook client is authenticating with DoveCot using IMAP protocol
> without issue.
>
> The Problem:
>
> The mail that is pla
on 4/1/2011 6:06 AM Walt Shekrota spake the following:
> I noticed in Cyrus they seem to address maildir++ recognised by IMAP.
>
> I need to know does Dovecot recognise this format?
> Procmail has an ability to deliver mails to different folders which
> if unrecognised renders the whole process u
on 3/30/2011 2:05 PM Jim Knuth spake the following:
> am 30.03.11 22:44 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter :
>
>> You don't want Jim to correct the Wiki. Not because he's braindead - I know
>> him personally and I value him a lot - but because of his English. Take a
>> look
>> at the threads he's been i
on 3/22/2011 3:52 PM Denny Schierz spake the following:
> hi Timo,
>
> Am 22.03.2011 um 17:48 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>
>> You mean recreating the profile didn't work, or you can't / don't want to
>> recreate it?
>
>
> its more strange, than i thought. I created a new user and created some
> f
on 2/4/2011 9:47 PM Luigi Rosa spake the following:
> Jerry said the following on 04/02/11 15:00:
>
Disconnected for inactivity.
Protocollo: IMAP
Server: mail.xxx
Porta: 143
Codice er
on 4-28-2010 2:06 PM Daniel Machado Grilo spake the following:
> Dear Dovecot users,
>
> I'm a sysadmin in a company that recently migrated the IMAP from
> courier-imap to dovecot :-) *urray*
>
> Everything with the perl migrating scripts (version 1.0) went with OKs
> and it was a lot of fun (and
on 4-15-2010 2:05 PM Ken A spake the following:
> I'm using dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.15 with dovecot-1.2.11.
>
> I have a reject test filter that looks like this:
>
> require "reject";
> if header :contains "subject" "reject" {
> reject "bye";
> }
>
> Is there any way to get a "reject" filter to se
on 9-8-2009 2:19 PM Laurent CARON spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if some users are using this plugin on production setups.
>
> If yes, how does it perform in terms of cpu load compared with the same
> setup without compression ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Laurent
>
I am only using it on archived
on 6-11-2009 4:14 AM Zwelabantu Ngwenya spake the following:
> Morning
>
>
>
> I am new to linux and have configured a Postfix + Dovecot Mail server on my
> SUSE Linux Server 10 SP2 Machine. Postfix works fine I assume as mail gets
> delivered to user's mailbox or directories. But when I confi
on 6-11-2009 3:22 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
> On 6/10/2009, Stef Simoens (stef.simo...@scarlet.be) wrote:
>> it doesn't do anything (especially not deleting e-mails).
>> Obviously, in stef/Trash and stef/Spam, there are e-mails waiting to be
>> deleted.
>
> It doesn't go by the email
on 6-6-2009 2:45 PM Harlan Stenn spake the following:
> Juergen wrote:
>> Harlan wrote:
>>> There is no corrected version of the real-time clock before the PC goes
>>> online.
>> I'd suggest to read chrony's manual. Chrony stores the reference values
>> collected while running online for further us
on 6-6-2009 11:50 AM Scott Haneda spake the following:
> Sorry for the top post and lack of snipping this email down, I'm using a
> mobile phone.
>
> Can you explain why the system clock gets so far out of time? I
> certainly struggle with crime (time?) drifting even on an always network
> connect
on 6-6-2009 12:52 PM Arno Wald spake the following:
> Pascal Volk wrote:
>> On Debian systems I'm very happy with the OpenBSD NTP daemon.
>> Package: openntpd
>> This ntpd adjusts the local time in little steps.
>
> Also on startup? ntpd uses little steps while running, too. But only at
> startup
on 6-4-2009 3:48 AM Noel Butler spake the following:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 12:16 +0200, henry ritzlmayr wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> optimizing the configuration on one of our servers (which was
>> hit by a brute force attack on dovecot) showed an odd behavior.
>>
>> Dovecot Version 1.0.7 (CentO
on 5-30-2009 2:25 PM Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk spake the following:
> On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> # e2fsck -D -f /dev/hdXY
>>
>> Note: This should work with both ext2 and ext3 filesystems. Depending
>> on the
>> size of your filesystem, this
on 5-29-2009 6:51 AM Eoin Kennedy spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the situation, I hope somebody can help me.
>
> Our Email server running ubuntu 8.04.1 and dovecot 1.0.10 rebooted, and when
> it came back up the dovecot config had changed.
>
> Prior to the reboot, users stored their
on 5-29-2009 1:42 AM Bernd Petrovitsch spake the following:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:28 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
>>> This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
>>> limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
>> T
on 5-28-2009 4:46 PM Curtis Maloney spake the following:
> robforrest wrote:
>> What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are
>> shown
>> the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a
>> given
>> email, they get no response even if they wait upwards o
>
>
> I used to keep an eye on these clients, and set a "never leave mail on
> server" setting on my old server. Not sure how to do this in Dovecot,
> though if I have my way, everyone is going to be on IMAP, though they
> are free to use it like POP if they want.
>
> Thanks again for your rep
on 5-28-2009 12:24 PM Scott Haneda spake the following:
> On May 28, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> on 5-28-2009 9:36 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
>>> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 02:07 -0700, robforrest wrote:
>>>> What is happening is that as use
on 5-28-2009 9:36 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 02:07 -0700, robforrest wrote:
>> What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are shown
>> the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a given
>> email, they get no response
on 5-28-2009 2:07 AM robforrest spake the following:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new here and would very much appreciate any help you can give me.
>
> We are running a rather outdated mail server that until recently has been
> running beautifully. Under the pretense of "it is ain't broke, don't fix
> it"
on 5-27-2009 6:20 AM Carlos Xavier spake the following:
> Hi,
> I am resending this email, since the fist one didn't hit the list.
Yes it did!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on 5-21-2009 11:33 AM Seth Mattinen spake the following:
> V S Rao wrote:
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> Thanks for the response. Apologize, but my responses are going to be a bit
>> lengthy.
>>
>>> I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run
>>> webmail using squirrelmail. When runn
on 5-20-2009 7:26 AM J.P. Trosclair spake the following:
> Romer Ventura wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My storage is running low and i was wondering what would be the best
>> and easy way of deleting everything within the "deleted" and
>> "expunged" folders for every user...?
>>
>> My mail resides in: /
on 5-18-2009 8:46 AM Matthijs Kooijman spake the following:
> Hi Scott,
>
>> One could always run the mailstore on LVM and then you could snapshot the
>> mount and then fsck it while still technically in use. It would probably slow
>> down the filesystem, but it is still live.
> Uhm, and then you
on 5-15-2009 11:59 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
> Wonder if anyone else has actually noticed this and has some kind of
> statistics?
>
> http://marc.info/?t=12423400331&r=1&w=2
>
One could always run the mailstore on LVM and then you could snapshot the
mount and then fsck it while st
on 5-14-2009 5:11 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
> Hello folks
>
> I have a problem related to the mbox format I think
>
> First we use MBOX format with Dovecot 1.14
>
> A user's here need to create some subfolders in his Imap space.
>
> Due to the use of MBOX format this is impossible fr
on 5-13-2009 8:55 AM Richard Hobbs spake the following:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On May 13, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Richard Hobbs wrote:
>>
Depends on the usage, but it's significantly better performing than
UW-IMAP. Dovecot+mbox is also significantly faster than UW-IMAP+mbox.
>>> OK... so Dov
on 5-7-2009 3:22 AM punit_j spake the following:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> What version of dovecot supports this feature ? I am using
> dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4 and gives error : -
>
> Starting Dovecot Imap: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot.conf
> line 495: Unknown setting: master_user_separ
on 4-16-2009 6:10 PM Jeff Grossman spake the following:
> On 4/16/2009 5:18 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>> On 4/16/2009 2:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:14 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Everything I can find about setting this up applies to virtual users
which
I
on 4-9-2009 8:10 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
> On 4/9/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
>>> Or should I go ahead and plan on doing this via cron as suggested?
>
>> It's not really necessary to do it via cron either, although users
>> may then have to wait a bit longer if they hav
>
> My plan was to keep it working as protocol lda {} in any case for v1.x
> and drop it in v2.0 when there are probably going to be other
> configuration changes.
>
Renaming it at a major version change makes the most sense since an admin will
have to test and fix config files anyway.
signat
on 3-25-2009 4:50 PM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:40 -0400, Gordon Dickens wrote:
>> My understanding is that Dovecot Version 2.0 will have this "multiple
>> SSL certificate" feature. So, my question is, when is version 2.0
>> projected to be released?
>
> v2.0
on 3-16-2009 8:46 AM Ondrej Svoboda spake the following:
> hi guys,
> I hope it's common trouble, but I'm not able to find a solution:
>
> - i'am using courier imap and trying to migrate to the dovecot
> - on courier I have all folders as subfolder of Inbox - i.e. Inbox.Sent
>
> but on dovecot th
on 3-13-2009 3:13 PM Charles Marcus spake the following:
> On 3/13/2009 6:00 PM, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
>>> So apparently you only want to use SQL authentication? Comment out
>>> passdb pam and userdb passwd in dovecot.conf.
>
>> Even with the output of dovecot -n Timo looks to me like he really
on 3-13-2009 1:04 PM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 3-13-2009 2:33 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
>>> Scott Silva wrote:
>>>> on 3-12-2009 10:29 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
on 3-13-2009 2:33 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 3-12-2009 10:29 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> since few days I got this in dovecot log
>>>
>>> I use 1.1.11 on Debian etch 64 bits
&g
on 3-12-2009 10:29 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
> Hello
>
> since few days I got this in dovecot log
>
> I use 1.1.11 on Debian etch 64 bits
>
> Thanks for any info
>
You need to give more info before you get more info.
How about if mail is local to machine or on NFS.
And also dovecot -
on 3-11-2009 4:15 PM Patrick A. Treptau spake the following:
> Hello,
>
> we're experiencing an odd issue after combining two vDisks used for mail
> storage into one big new LVM. We've done this in the past successfully and
> didn't experience a lot of problems. We
> stopped all services (dovecot/
on 3-12-2009 4:25 AM GVG GVG spake the following:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/12/2009, GVG GVG (gvg...@googlemail.com) wrote:
>>> does this mean that having sendmail I'll be not able to have virtual
>>> users?
>> No, it means postfix is vastly superior to
gt;
> *sigh*. No. It releases the locks as soon as it reads.
> (The CGI process ends.) So if my script accesses by IMAP,
> which also releases the locks, openwebmail can change the
> folder in the meantime, regardless of what lock mechanism I
> use.
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Sco
on 3-3-2009 3:15 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>> You could use dovecot's deliver and then you won't need to
>> worry about procmails locking.
>
> That's not going to happen either, a large portion of the
> ap
on 3-3-2009 2:55 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> How does IMAP lock the /var/spool/mail/user file?
mbox_read_locks and mbox_write_locks defines it.
>>> mbox_read_locks = fcntl
>>> mbox_write_locks = dotlock fcntl
>>>
>>> Unfortunately ope
32:39 anubis dovecot: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=2610
> Feb 27 13:32:39 anubis dovecot: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=2611
> Feb 27 13:32:39 anubis dovecot: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=2613
> Feb 27 13:32:39 anubis dovecot: auth(default): new auth connection
on 2-26-2009 3:29 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:23 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
>>>>> Feb 26 14:14:06 anubis dov
on 2-26-2009 3:25 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
> on 2-26-2009 3:04 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:23 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
>>>> Feb 26 14:14:06 anubis dovecot: chil
on 2-26-2009 3:04 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:23 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
>>> Feb 26 14:14:06 anubis dovecot: child 25810 (pop3) killed with signal 11
>> It shouldn't be crashing. Could you get a gdb backtrace fr
on 2-25-2009 5:55 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
> I have to make dotlock work because this openwebmail thing
> only supports one of dotlock or flock, but procmail delivery
> does dotlock and fcntl. procmail correctly creates a
> dotlock file in /var/spool/mail/username.lock when
> delivering
on 2-24-2009 5:56 PM Daniel Aleksandersen spake the following:
> Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:36:00 +0100 (CET)
> Fra: "Daniel Aleksandersen"
>> Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:11:43 -0500
>> Fra: Timo Sirainent
>>> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:38 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 200
on 2-24-2009 4:36 PM Daniel Aleksandersen spake the following:
> Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:11:43 -0500
> Fra: Timo Sirainent
>> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:38 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
>>> Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:29:17 +0100
>>> Fra: Pascal Volk
On 25.02.2009 00:25 Daniel Aleksanders
on 2-24-2009 10:46 AM barnaby cockcroft spake the following:
> Can anyone here help me out with a client side Outlook issue? I know
> outlook is a horrible imap client :(
>
> We intermittently have a problem where mail gets "stuck" in Outlook
> users' outboxes.
>
> Might have anything to do with
on 2-18-2009 8:12 AM Rob Mangiafico spake the following:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Harry Lachanas wrote:
OK..
So I synced the clock
and got
dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 1 seconds. I'll sleep now
until we're back in present. http://wiki.dovecot.org/TimeM
on 2-18-2009 7:17 AM Harry Lachanas spake the following:
> OK..
> So I synced the clock
> and got
>
How are you syncing the clock? The preferred method is to run ntpd to keep the
clock synced by nudging the timer faster or slower instead of doing large time
corrections.
> dovecot: Time
on 2-12-2009 3:48 PM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> I just found this;
>> http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=736
>> I guess Outlook 2003 introduced a newer version of the PST files that
on 2-12-2009 3:31 PM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> on 2-12-2009 10:35 AM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
>>> Outlook DOES store some kind of cache of IMAP mail in a PST. And that
>>> PST is
on 2-12-2009 10:52 AM Brian Hayden spake the following:
> On Feb 12 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>
>> The problem is with mbox in general. Mbox can only contain messages,
>> and since
>> your deleted items (trash) is also mbox, you can't delete a folder
>> int
on 2-12-2009 10:35 AM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> Outlook does not store IMAP mail in its PST. PST's are only used for
>> the local
>> storage. Outlook does not crash if your IMAP mail folders are larger
&g
on 2-12-2009 1:34 AM Jan Niggemann spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> first of all: yes, I already dug the internet but didn't find a solution -
> that's why I'm asking you.
> My provider uses dovecot, although I can't tell you more about the version -
> sorry. Mail is stored in mbox format.
>
> My
on 2-12-2009 2:10 AM Aiko Barz spake the following:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:27:02PM -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
> wrote:
>> Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express (imap)
>> as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with random
>> missi
on 2-10-2009 9:18 AM Harry Lachanas spake the following:
> Luciano Mannucci wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a postfix+procmail+dovecot installation, now running basicaly
>> on pop3 hence mailbox format, with few thousand users and less than
>> twenty gigabytes mail.
>> I need to move all of them to
on 2-10-2009 7:49 AM Luciano Mannucci spake the following:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a postfix+procmail+dovecot installation, now running basicaly
> on pop3 hence mailbox format, with few thousand users and less than
> twenty gigabytes mail.
> I need to move all of them to maildir, to take advantage of
on 2-10-2009 9:21 AM Harry Lachanas spake the following:
> Luciano Mannucci wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a postfix+procmail+dovecot installation, now running basicaly
>> on pop3 hence mailbox format, with few thousand users and less than
>> twenty gigabytes mail.
>> I need to move all of them to
on 2-10-2009 9:02 AM Angel Marin spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 2-9-2009 8:07 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
>>> guys , i m new to centos. i have learned to use yum and the priority
>>> plugin.
>>> Does the atrpm repo provide the m
on 2-9-2009 7:53 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
>
>>> B. Am i right in concluding that its easier and better in the long run to
>> implement and enforce quotas thru dovecot instead of postfix?
>>
>> If you enforce quota with postfix only, the quota effects mail deliveries
>> via
>> SMTP
on 2-9-2009 8:07 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
> guys , i m new to centos. i have learned to use yum and the priority plugin.
>Does the atrpm repo provide the most up to date version of dovecot? i have
the following
>repos configured ->epel and rpm forge besides thestandard
>base,updates,
on 2-9-2009 6:21 AM Stewart Dean spake the following:
> Curious. What are the small annoyances
>
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations! Wow, Finland to Blacksburg. That could make for some
>>> interesting 'culture shock' posts.
>>
>> A
on 2-5-2009 8:15 PM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> When I finally decide to convert to maildir, will I have to set up
>> namespaces
>> during the conversion, or will dovecot figure out where everything is
>&g
When I finally decide to convert to maildir, will I have to set up namespaces
during the conversion, or will dovecot figure out where everything is by itself?
Should I set up deliver to go to maildir/ globally, or per user?
I have considered using the convert plugin, if there are not a lot of neg
on 2-4-2009 12:09 PM Anthony Davis spake the following:
> Please remove me from the mailing list, i have tried a number of times
> to un-subscribe, but i still keep getting emails...
>
> Tony
>
> On 4 Feb 2009, at 19:35, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote:
>
>> dovecot@dovecot.org
>
>
What did
on 2-5-2009 6:47 AM Jehan Pagès spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you are
>> syaing you are operating an ISP service?
>>
>
> As for I, net neutrality is not about ISP only, but a
>>
>> Switch to Maildir and the problem goes away. The issue is that the mbox
>> file is read-locked when the first message is read. And since the POP3
>> client most likely just keeps reading messages for the entire session,
>> the mbox file kept read-locked all the time. Can't really be fixed
>>
on 2-4-2009 8:14 AM Bruce Bodger spake the following:
> I've figured this one out... Just wanted to get it into the dovecot
> mailing list archive so that somebody in the future might find it if
> they need it.
>
> Running Dovecot on Mac OS X 10.4.11 and using LaunchDaemon to start.
> Following
on 2-1-2009 3:50 AM Harry Lachanas spake the following:
> Hi all,
>
> I finally manged to create somehow shared folders in dovecot imap ...
>
> After a number trials I came up with this conf from my test server
> #---
on 1-9-2009 10:16 AM Stewart Dean spake the following:
> I have been running a test DC IMAP server to evaluate the new release
> before migrating from 1.0.15 to 1.1.8. The test server access all the
> INBOX and homedir folder filesystems through NFS imports.
> The index file filesystem is local on
on 1-7-2009 9:26 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 12:12 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The previous log output is with me telnetting in manually, however the
webmail software (roundcube) produces the same results.
>>> That's weird. I'll try to reproduce it tomorr
on 12-16-2008 6:23 AM Peter Risdon spake the following:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 10:24 +, Peter Risdon wrote:
>>
>>> With just one user, on a virtual hosting system with several hundred
>>> users spread across a couple of dozen domains, there is the following
>>> error,
on 11-21-2008 1:53 AM Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo spake the following:
> Hi all.
>
> I want to use two servers with dovecot using a common file system with drbd.
> So I have several questions.
> If one server write a mail to th file system he will use his name as
> part of the mail identification.
> th
on 10-30-2008 11:42 AM Allen Belletti spake the following:
> I'd like to add my vote here as well; dbox would be *the* feature that
> would make me happy. I'm the guy who asked a few weeks ago about ways to
> speed access on our GFS clustered mail environment.
>
> Meanwhile, I've done some prelimi
on 10-29-2008 3:18 PM Dave McGuire spake the following:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> What is the best way to do a (server-side) backup of all mail in a
> user's mail?
I usually just rsync the /home directories to another server. The
inital sync
on 10-29-2008 2:46 PM Neil spake the following:
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 16:02, Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 10-29-2008 12:47 PM Dave McGuire spake the following:
>>> On Oct 29, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>>>> What is the best way to do a (server-side) backup o
on 10-29-2008 12:47 PM Dave McGuire spake the following:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>> What is the best way to do a (server-side) backup of all mail in a
>>> user's mail?
>>>
>> I usually just rsync the /home directories to another
on 10-29-2008 12:25 PM Neil spake the following:
> What is the best way to do a (server-side) backup of all mail in a
> user's mail?
>
> I don't think I'm doing anything weird as far as configs go; here's
> dovecot -n if it helps:
>
> # 1.1.4: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> protocols: imaps
> listen
on 10-29-2008 6:41 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondered if anyone could help me with an issue im having with a new
> email server im setting up.
>
> These are the errors i have been getting:
>
> deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Oct 29 13:32:13 Info: msgid=<
> [EMAIL PROTE
on 10-27-2008 3:51 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
> On 10/26/2008, Bill Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> As the Dovecot website says in reference to this mailing list, you
>> should specify your Dovecot version, your OS and version (and with
>> Linux, the specific distribution,) your CPU
on 10-23-2008 4:31 PM Albert E. Whale spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 10-23-2008 1:35 PM Neil spake the following:
>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:17, Albert E. Whale wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Neil wrote:
>>>
on 10-23-2008 1:35 PM Neil spake the following:
>
> On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:17, Albert E. Whale wrote:
>
>> Neil wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:35, Albert E. Whale wrote:
>>>
I've been running a mbox solution using UW's IMAP server. I've run it
for years.
Now do to heavy
on 10-22-2008 9:11 PM Kyle Wheeler spake the following:
> On Wednesday, October 22 at 11:35 PM, quoth Albert E. Whale:
>> I am currently testing a single user, and have successfully converted
>> the mail messages from mbox to Maildir format, and now I am setting up
>> the procmail tool to place the
on 10-3-2008 11:44 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following:
> Hallo,
>
> is it possible to implement a "flat folder view" for POP3 users?
>
> The problem is that POP3 only knows one folder: INBOX. Now, if a user logs
> in via POP3, he won't see messages that live outside the INBOX folder - th
on 10-3-2008 8:16 AM Ilo Lorusso spake the following:
> Hi ,
>
> I think the question has been asked before ... but I need to be adviced on
> what would be the best way to import
> microsoft PST's into Dovecot.. ?
>
> What software can I use.. can a anyone make any recommendations? even if
> one
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
