access to the running
> system won't reveal their contents (although it would help).
I'm in favour of both whole-disk and application-based encryption.
They complement each other, neither makes the other useless.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
I've frequently told everyone to assume that their email is
> insecure, and if they've got a problem with it they need to use PGP or some
> other end-to-end encryption on their mail clients. Not my problem!
I think the far majority of cases are like that, and I'd guess
most do
n
you *can't* read them. (New mails can of course still be intercepted
as noted, but that doesn't mean protecting old stuff isn't useful.)
Anyway, this can be done with procmail as well, but a dovecot
plugin might be more convenient.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
ks the next one."
How did I miss that. Thank you!
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases
Right. One caveat remains:
"Currently the fallback works only with the PLAIN authentication mechanism."
Guess I can live with that.
Thanks again, and apologies for careless reading of the docs,
--
Tapani Tarvainen
first map an account to a fixed authentication
mechanism/password and if it fails, others won't be tried?
--
Tapani Tarvainen
