Re: [Dovecot] plugin problem

> > Anyway, I don't recommend training from pristine because of the resource > overhead and it being hard to guarantee the message is indeed pristine, > but if it suits you I can't stop you from doing it :) > Really? I found the downside of using signatures much worse than not using them: If t

Re: [Dovecot] rule of thumb for indexing overhead

> >> of indexing during delivery are negligible for us in general and >> potentially negative in some scenarios (mass mail to many/all users). > > Is this negative hypothetical or have you actually seen load spikes in > situations like this? I actually did see that. In the case of exim, for ea

Re: [Dovecot] rule of thumb for indexing overhead

> Indexes aren't normally "rebuilt", they're "updated". And the update > overhead is practically nothing with maildir. > > I just wrote this: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Indexing Hi Timo... So, if I understand this correctly, if I'm using maildir, I could use exim to do the local delivery inste

[Dovecot] deleting maildir files

Greetings all... Can we delete maildir files directly from the file system? Basically, we use dovecot to train spam, and we want to delete messages that are older than 30 days, using a simple "find /maildirs -cname +30 -name *imap-server* -exec rm {} \;" I have seen a post a while ago saying tha

Re: [Dovecot] prefetch + static + deliver

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:27 -0700, Tom Bombadil wrote: >> "If you're using Dovecot's local delivery agent, you'll still need a >> valid userdb which it can use to locate the users. You can do this by >> adding a normal sql/ldap u

[Dovecot] prefetch + static + deliver

Hi all... The prefetch entry in the wiki says: "If you're using Dovecot's local delivery agent, you'll still need a valid userdb which it can use to locate the users. You can do this by adding a normal sql/ldap userdb after userdb prefetch." (http://wiki.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/Prefetch) My q

Re: [Dovecot] netapp/maildir/dovecot performance

We used to have RHEL4 talking NFS to bluearc (instead of netapp). Switching to solaris 10 improved performance about 10 fold. The app was postgres though, not dovecot. Cheers bofh list wrote: > On 3/22/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > >> What

Re: [Dovecot] netapp/maildir/dovecot performance

bofh list wrote: > We are seeing some poor performance recently that is focused around > users with large mailboxes (100,000 message /INBOX, 80,000 message > subfolders, etc). > > The performance problem manifests as very high system% utilization - > basically iowait for NFS. > > There are two

Re: [Dovecot] Solaris Dovecot dovecot dovecot-1.0.rc27

Phil Oleson wrote: > Randall Svancara wrote: >> >> dovecot: Mar 21 15:34:25 Info: imap-login: Login: user=, >> method=PLAIN, rip=134.121.92.228, lip=134.121.5.141, TLS >> dovecot: Mar 21 15:34:25 Error: IMAP(someusername): ld.so.1: imap: >> fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or direct

Re: [Dovecot] deliver to subfolder with dovecot's LDA

> So you are using static userdb? I'm not sure how this could be fixed. > Especially if you're using passdb PAM + userdb static it could be > impossible for Dovecot to verify if the user exists (I don't think > PAM_USER_UNKNOWN reply can be relied on, plus it could do 2 second > delays for each us

[Dovecot] deliver to subfolder with dovecot's LDA

Hi all... How can deliver messages to a subfolder using the LDA? For example, I want a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be placed inside the 'spam' subfolder. Any hint is appreciated. Thanks ;)