x27;ve set up option two in a test setup, though the incron/inotify
> part is still giving me a headache.
--
--
Troy Benjegerdes'da hozer'ho...@hozed.org
Unless hours were cups of sack, and minut
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:29PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 09:58 -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Best case, when all the nodes, and the network is up, locking latency
> > shouldn't be much longer than say twice the RTT. But what really
> > m
d
complexity issue that's going to be there whether it's dovecot
replication, or a cluster filesystem that's doing the dirty work for
you.
--
--
Troy Benjegerdes'da hozer'
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:33:23PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 22:31 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > or Git?
> >
> > It seems a bit kludgy with all of its different commands and scripts.
> > Also I don't really like its code. It's using standard C functions for
> > string
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:20:13PM -0400, Bill Boebel wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 1:42 am, Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I'm going to throw out a warning that it's my feeling that replication
> > has ended many otherwise worthwhile projects
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:41:46AM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:17:25 +0300 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:04 -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > But that's currently not *really* replicated. Th
gt; After master/multi-slave is working, we're nearly ready for a full
> multi-master operation. The master farm will need global locking.
> Perhaps there is a usable existing implementation which could be used.
> In any case there needs to be a way to keeps track of what master owns
> w
ta fetches Dovecot is 4 times faster than
> dbmail. This is most likely because dbmail doesn't have a cache
> equivalent to dovecot.index.cache so it has to do the fetches the
> slow way.
>
> I would have liked to also run the generic tests with more than 1
> client, but t
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:06:43PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> John Rowe writes:
>
> >gluster is looking extremely interesting although it's rather new.
>
> Thanks. Saw it on a list of distributed FS but didn't click on it.
>
> I was planning to take a look at AFS and Coda to start. Will als
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:42:48PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns I
> am trying to address where I work.
>
> Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
>
> NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a sec
#x27;s AFS tokens?
Thanks
--
--
Troy Benjegerdes'da hozer'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Somone asked me why I work on this free (http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/)
software stuff and not get a real job
11 matches
Mail list logo
