Dear Ioannis,
> I've searched around for a solution to this, and figured out that a special
> userdb {} section in the protocol lmtp {} section, with driver = ldap etc etc
> so that i 'd be able to "show" the correct user to the lmtp might work, but
> strangely that userdb {} setting looks like be
Dear all,
A lot of doveadm commands (e.g. backup/sync, deduplicate, mailbox) support a
`-S` (a.k.a `socket-path`) argument that allows to run the command remotely.
Unfortunately, I think that there is a bug in the handling of the TLS
configuration for this feature.
After a bit of debugging, I thi
93): Authenticating as X for user user1
[...]
${backend} dovecot: imap(user2)<31073>: Debug:
imapc(${director}:993): Authenticating as Xuser2 for user user1
```
It looks to me that for the first connection, imapc_master_user is
resolved with the wrong context, without `userdb:sharing_user`
Hi Markus,
> It works better if the backend userdb or passdb sets
> imapc_master_user=%{user} or userdb_imapc_master_user=%{user}.
This works much better indeed, thanks!
> The documentation will be updated soon. There will be also some
> example configuration snippets to make it easier to config
Hi!
> It then falls through my personal sieve filter and hits the implicit
> keep at the end and ends up in my inbox - with the original headers.
I had a similar issue recently (with addheader, not deleteheader) and I
was pointed to the RFC:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5293#section-5
Hi!
> I would like to try the oauth2 mechanism to autenticate my users.
>
> [...]
>
> My Thunderbird client [...]
Not a Thunderbird/Dovecot expert here, so only talking about my
experience. We have a setup here with Dovecot supporting OAUTHBEARER &
XOAUTH2 to allow our web-based interface (Open-
Hi Andrea,
> Do you know if the same applies also to other clients like Apple Mail
> and Outlook 20xx?
Sorry, I have not looked into it so I can't answer this. What I don't
understand really in the way OAUTHBEARER or XOAUTH2 works with IMAP is
how the client is supposed to know where to obtain a t
Hi!
After updating to 2.3.15, I was hoping to be able to get rid of some of
the work-around I had in place when configuring shared folders in
cluster mode in 2.3.14. Unfortunately it seems that I still need one.
Running on CentOS7 with both a 'virtual' and 'shared' namespace,
whenever I update th
Hi Andrea, all
> I simply put in a file /etc/dovecot/keys/webmail/RS256/ the
> value of the public key found on the keycloak console.
>
> Which is the correct format of that file?
It's json. I had the same question initially, had to check the code.
I obtain that file from
https://${keycloak}/aut
or the text fields in the Solr Schema? It sounds that this
could improve a lot the disk space used by Solr without losing any
feature. The only thing I'm not too clear about is the
"autoGeneratePhraseQueries" which is enabled in
https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/doc/solr-
Dear Shawn,
Thanks for your very complete answer!
> This is completely off-topic for the dovecot list. I am involved with
> the Solr project, so I can discuss it. My message will also be off
> topic here.
Sorry, maybe I didn't explain myself properly. I asked on the dovecot
mailing list as I'm
Dear all,
Just a status update, in case this can help others.
We went forward and disabled the position information indexing and the
re-indexed of our mail data (over a couple of days to avoid overloading
the systems). Before the re-indexing we had 1.33 TiB in our Solr
Indexes. After re-index
Hi Alessio,
this optimization also produce a less RAM requirements on Solr server?
Unfortunately we didn't measure this before/after the change. Since we
are removing features (position information), I wouldn't expect the
memory requirement to increase, but I'm no expert.
To be honest, I'v
13 matches
Mail list logo
