[Dovecot] graceful failure when some folders are not available...

2007-10-03 Thread bhayden
Hi folks. Quick question in the hopes that someone knows the answer, before I dig in the code some more. In testing a new setup with some long-term archival mbox-format mailboxes stored on an NFS mount, we've found the following: if the mount is unavailable for any reason, the user cannot log

Re: [Dovecot] imap process consuming 100% CPU (Dovecot 1.0.3)

2007-09-07 Thread bhayden
On Sep 7 2007, Jackie Hunt wrote: Sorry, don't know about the mid: protocol. Not sure how to get to the reference you sent. From your email it looks like gdb has the ability to attach to a running process. We have dbx which I don't believe can do that. It would be nice to confirm our

Re: [Dovecot] namespaces and creation of folders that contain folders...

2007-08-14 Thread bhayden
On Aug 14 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 21:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Timo and all. imap/cmd-create.c contains the following bit of code: .. So. Am I missing something, or crazy, or is this really a bug? Thanks, It's a bug. Fixed:

Re: [Dovecot] Some of my IMAP Folders vanished in some MUAs

2007-08-03 Thread bhayden
On Aug 3 2007, Charles Marcus wrote: Eh? Folder subscription is such a basic feature/function of IMAP that I would not blame the MUA in this case, I'd blame the user... ;) Well... it's irritating that the usual ways of dealing with SUBSCRIBE and LSUB make subscriptions break if (for example)

Re: [Dovecot] Some of my IMAP Folders vanished in some MUAs

2007-08-03 Thread bhayden
On Aug 3 2007, Charles Marcus wrote: On that we agree... and certainly, if there *is* something that dovecot can do to make things easier - by all means, tell Timo - as I said (and should be obvious) - he is more than willing to make dovecot better, especially if it can be done without too

Re: [Dovecot] mbox bug in 1.0.0

2007-08-01 Thread bhayden
On Jun 19 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 13 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.error] [9073] IMAP(USER): mbox /var/mail/user: seq=1 uid=8808 uid_broken=0 originally needed

[Dovecot] mbox inbox default

2007-08-01 Thread bhayden
HI Timo all. We're an mbox environment, inboxes in /var/mail/$USER (I'll include dovecot -n output at the bottom of this mail). mail_location is set accordingly for deliver. I'd assumed that if the /var/mail/$USER file doesn't exist, dovecot would create it, but we've discovered from

Re: [Dovecot] mbox inbox default

2007-08-01 Thread bhayden
On Aug 1 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're an mbox environment, inboxes in /var/mail/$USER (I'll include dovecot -n output at the bottom of this mail). mail_location is set accordingly for deliver. I'd assumed that if the

Re: [Dovecot] LSUB/SUBSCRIBE under namespaces

2007-06-20 Thread bhayden
On Jun 18 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks. Here's our situation: Migrating from UW-IMAP. Have lots (as in, tens of thousands) of clients set up using '~/mail' as the IMAP root, and using subscriptions. The rest of my original message is at the end for context. :) Brief:

Re: [Dovecot] mbox bug in 1.0.0

2007-06-19 Thread bhayden
On May 13 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.error] [9073] IMAP(USER): mbox /var/mail/user: seq=1 uid=8808 uid_broken=0 originally needed 10 bytes, now needs 23 bytes Anything else

[Dovecot] dovecot-shared being ignored?

2007-05-18 Thread bhayden
So, I'm working on a shared folder. Everything is nice except for one bit. My dovecot-shared file in the Maildir is either being ignored, or doesn't work the way I think it does. Any messages copied into the Maildir using a mail client are mode 660 and owned by the user who did the copy. Perms

[Dovecot] mbox bug in 1.0.0

2007-04-23 Thread bhayden
Hi folks. We're moving users from rc24 and 27 to 1.0.0. On four mailboxes so far we've seen these errors after the move (quick and dirty anonymizing follows): Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.info] imap-login: Login: user=USER, pid=9046, method=PLAIN,