Re: [Dovecot] Segfault in libdovecot-sieve

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 it is the webmail problem or postfix problem dearty dancing Le 21.10.2010 20:13, Andre a écrit : > Sigh. The webmail broke the configuration output. Here's it again. > > # 2.0.3 (02a9cf90ad02): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # OS: Linux 2.6.32-25-serv

Re: [Dovecot] Segfault in libdovecot-sieve

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 21.10.2010 16:13, an...@digirati.com.br a écrit : > Em 21/10/2010, Stephan Bosch escreveu: > >   Output from: dovecot -n > > # 2.0.3 (02a9cf90ad02): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # OS: Linux 2.6.32-25-server x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04

Re: [Dovecot] CLient issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 18.10.2010 19:27, Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 2010-10-16 5:38 PM, The Doctor wrote: >> However some POP3 issues have popped up. >> >> 1) Outlook reate e-mail but not on Thunderbird. > > What does 'reate' mean? > >> 2) AVG Proxy interferes with P

Re: [Dovecot] Filtering IP address connections ?

Le 18.10.2010 16:34, Frank Bonnet a écrit : > OK folks > > I'll let the firewall do the job ! > > Thanks > and check the config to postfix it is easy to implement custom cidr table -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A

Re: [Dovecot] Filtering IP address connections ?

Le 18.10.2010 15:24, Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 2010-10-18 8:49 AM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: >> with sieve is also possible: I give an example >> >> require >> ["fileinto","regex","comparator-i;ascii-numeric","reject&

Re: [Dovecot] Filtering IP address connections ?

Le 18.10.2010 14:32, Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit : > > why not make things easier and use your OS packet filter for that ? > iptables for linux, for example > > Em 18/10/2010 10:22, Frank Bonnet escreveu: >> Hello >> >> Is it possible to refuse connections from some IP address >> in Dovecot c

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot chgrp actions on new files/folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 14.10.2010 19:49, David Ford a écrit : > Timo, > > I did further study of the user/group permissions. Applying the below > patch will make no difference to virtually everyone out there. Those > that have default uid/gid ownership won't see any c