hing you a God blessed merry Christmas I thank you for the support ;)
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 12/23/2011 4:12 AM, hydra wrote:
> > Yes, it is reproducible.
> >
> > About the file, I have tarred up the original maildir before I deleted
> th
.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 22.12.2011, at 18.06, hydra wrote:
>
> > After the virtual machine reboot, the CPU usage is normal again, but just
> > until doveadm is launched again (it was run from cron). Sorry for the
> > partition
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 8:08 AM, hydra wrote:
> > Hello Timo, thank you for the reply. I was suspecting the same. However:
> > - the machine runs under Vmware,
> > - I've tried 3 different kernel versions,
> > - I'
011, at 18.38, hydra wrote:
>
> > I suspect, that dovecot v2.0.16 under Linux (tested on Gentoo 3.0.4
> > Hardened, Gentoo 3.0.6, Gentoo 3.1.4) causes 100% cpu utilization when
> > index.cache is broken and doveadm is lanched. Dovecot uses LDAP as the
> > userdb and provid
I suspect, that dovecot v2.0.16 under Linux (tested on Gentoo 3.0.4
Hardened, Gentoo 3.0.6, Gentoo 3.1.4) causes 100% cpu utilization when
index.cache is broken and doveadm is lanched. Dovecot uses LDAP as the
userdb and provides IMAP and LDA. Because each user has a quota, the
doveadm's expunge fu
