Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:04 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Looks like some input stream seeking optimizations are broken (when > one input stream reads from another, which reads from another, ...). I > already managed to fix the performance problem, but now it's > corrupting saved mails sometimes. S

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-25 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 24.2.2010, at 20.27, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Looks like there's something very wrong with mbox with v1.2+. It's doing > a *lot* of message header parsing work that doesn't happen with v1.1 or > with other mailbox formats. Probably because I fixed some bugs where it > was wrongly caching some sta

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-24 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Stan Hoeppner : I'm running mbox with 1.2 and not seeing any problems... But that may be because I threw a lot of hardware at it? Hi Eric. Not sure if even fast hardware searching 11,000+ message count mbox'en without an FTS plugin would give speedy results, given Timo's discovery of

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-24 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Eric Rostetter put forth on 2/24/2010 9:13 PM: > Quoting Stan Hoeppner : > >> I guess you didn't have enough (any?) people testing mbox body search >> before >> the v1.2 release. Is everyone but me using maildir? Makes me wish I >> had an >> extra box so I could do dovecot devel version testing

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-24 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Stan Hoeppner : I guess you didn't have enough (any?) people testing mbox body search before the v1.2 release. Is everyone but me using maildir? Makes me wish I had an extra box so I could do dovecot devel version testing against mbox. I'm running mbox with 1.2 and not seeing any pro

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-24 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/24/2010 12:27 PM: > Well, when index is up-to-date it's fast. But after you've received a > few mails, at least with me it seemed to spend more time updating the > index than just doing the regular search. Ahh, I see what you mean. It's slower after new mail arrives,

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-24 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 01:21 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Stan Hoeppner put forth on 2/24/2010 12:17 AM: > > Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/23/2010 11:06 PM: > > >> No, body searches aren't indexed (without fts plugins). > > I wish you'd have mentioned the Squat plugin earlier Timo. I feel I've ma

Re: [Dovecot] **OFF LIST** Re: body search very slow since upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.2.10

2010-02-23 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 2/24/2010 12:17 AM: > Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/23/2010 11:06 PM: >> No, body searches aren't indexed (without fts plugins). I wish you'd have mentioned the Squat plugin earlier Timo. I feel I've made a fool of myself. I just setup squat and after a long first sear