On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> has someone worked with DRBD (http://www.drbd.org) for HA of mail storage?
> if so, does it have stability issues? comments and experiences are thanked
> :)
>
> Thanks,
> Rodolfo.
>
We have deployed active/passive
On Die, 2009-11-24 at 13:44 -0600, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
[...]
> I'm doing dovecot off DRBD 8.3, RHCS, GFS, active-active... Why would
> you recommend DRBD 7 instead of 8?
Because I thought 7 is the newest stable and didn't realized that it is
(apparently) 8.
Thanks for pointing that out!
Be
Quoting Bernd Petrovitsch :
(Now) 25K mailboxes (with ~92GB data) on DRBD-6 (now old - the thing was
built in early 2006) with ext{3,4} on it. As long as heartbeat/
pacemaker/openais/whatever assures that it is mounted on at most one
host, no problems whatsoever with the filesystem as such.
I'
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 15:25 -0600, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez wrote:
[...]
> has someone worked with DRBD (http://www.drbd.org) for HA of mail
> storage? if so, does it have stability issues? comments and experiences
> are thanked :)
(Now) 25K mailboxes (with ~92GB data) on DRBD-6 (now old - the t
Quoting Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez :
has someone worked with DRBD (http://www.drbd.org) for HA of mail storage?
Yes.
if so, does it have stability issues?
None that I've run into.
comments and experiences are thanked :)
Works great for me (two machines, sharing via DRBD, using LVM+GFS,
Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez wrote:
Hello all,
has someone worked with DRBD (http://www.drbd.org) for HA of mail
storage? if so, does it have stability issues? comments and experiences
are thanked :)
Look for thread "Dovecot + DRBD/GFS mailstore" starting 6/5/2009 on this
list.
~Seth
Hello all,
has someone worked with DRBD (http://www.drbd.org) for HA of mail
storage? if so, does it have stability issues? comments and experiences
are thanked :)
Thanks,
Rodolfo.
