"Frank Behrens" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 20:02:
>> Dovecot's design issues to consider are as follows:
>> a) making dovecot support hash/btree/dbm maps for passwd/userdb
>>[AFAIR Timo stated it is too complicated to be "cost effective" from
>>his perspective]
>> b)
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 20:02:
> Dovecot's design issues to consider are as follows:
> a) making dovecot support hash/btree/dbm maps for passwd/userdb
>[AFAIR Timo stated it is too complicated to be "cost effective" from
>his perspective]
> b) making dovecot support sendmai
"Frank Behrens" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 9:21:
>> It is possible to "significantly" twist sendmail.cf use $h to select
>> dovecot's mailbox and $u to pass user+det...@domain (one *or many*).
>> [ BTW the way I think about will make sendmail support "aliases with
>> domain
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on 21 Oct 2009 9:21:
> It is possible to "significantly" twist sendmail.cf use $h to select
> dovecot's mailbox and $u to pass user+det...@domain (one *or many*).
> [ BTW the way I think about will make sendmail support "alises with
> domains" instead
> of current "alias
"Frank Behrens" wrote:
> When I upgraded my old, long running dovecot 1.1 to newer dovecot-1.2.4 +
> doevecot-sieve-
> 0.1.12 I observed a change in destination address (-a) parsing.
>
> Old behaviour:
> When Timo introduced this feature
> (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-September/02581
