Troy Benjegerdes writes:
I think you should at least try Coda, but don't spend too much time on
it. It is mostly a research project. I don't know of anyone really using
it in production use.
Hmmm. Didn't know that.
I knew it was a research project, but did not know it was not much in
Scott Silva writes:
If you want to experiment with a inexpensive NAS with replication, look at
Freenas. It can do nfs sharing and automatic replication with rsync.
And it is free and based on Freebsd. Still immature, but it has a lot of
promise.
Our experience with FreeBSD+NFS has been less
John Rowe writes:
gluster is looking extremely interesting although it's rather new.
Thanks. Saw it on a list of distributed FS but didn't click on it.
I was planning to take a look at AFS and Coda to start. Will also take a
look at gluster, although so far it seems a Linux only FS.
Troy Benjegerdes writes:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/port-freebsd/2007-February/000199.html
The freebsd port looks like it might be a bit hairy yet though.
AFS and CODA are on my list to check.
Another user in this list mentioned Gluster.
I must say gluster looks very interesting.
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:06:43PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
John Rowe writes:
gluster is looking extremely interesting although it's rather new.
Thanks. Saw it on a list of distributed FS but didn't click on it.
I was planning to take a look at AFS and Coda to start. Will also take
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second device are
extremely expensive.
gluster is looking extremely interesting although it's rather new. I've
tried the beta of file replication and it works, the non-beta is due
Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns I
am trying to address where I work.
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second device are
extremely expensive.
Worth checking out is
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:42:48PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns I
am trying to address where I work.
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second
Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns I
am trying to address where I work.
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second device are
extremely expensive.
I also don't see any distributed
Francisco Reyes spake the following on 4/28/2007 9:42 AM:
Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns
I am trying to address where I work.
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second device
10 matches
Mail list logo
