On 30.4.2014, at 0.27, Michael M Slusarz slus...@curecanti.org wrote:
Given this test message, with admittedly incorrect QP encoding:
..
Dovecot 2.2 returns this:
C: 5 UID FETCH 4464 (BINARY.PEEK[1])
S: * 1 FETCH (UID 4464 BINARY[1] NIL)
S: 5 OK Fetch completed.
Contrast with, e.g.,
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 30.4.2014, at 0.27, Michael M Slusarz slus...@curecanti.org wrote:
Not sure if this is an example of Cyrus' QP decoder being more
robust (or lenient) than Dovecot's. Or whether this is intentional
to return NIL for this kind of bad data.
It was kind
Given this test message, with admittedly incorrect QP encoding:
From: Test t...@example.com
Subject: Test
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
To: Test t...@example.com
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:54:10 +
Message-Id: 1...@example.com
