On 14.10.2013, at 19.08, Jörg Lübbert j.luebb...@kaladix.org wrote:
from my understanding, using 1024bit DH parameters results in a not
sufficiently secure key exchange for DH(E). Therefore I think it would be
advisable to have parameters of at least 2048bit . In fact, I would see a
great
Hello,
from my understanding, using 1024bit DH parameters results in a not
sufficiently secure key exchange for DH(E). Therefore I think it would
be advisable to have parameters of at least 2048bit . In fact, I would
see a great benefit in chosing parameter length arbitrarily.
I also do not
On 10.9.2013, at 22.57, Dimi - 00t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Is there any possibility to let dovecot serve 1024 Bit DH Parameters at
SSL/TLS-connections? Is it possible to replace
/var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.ssl with DH-parameter generated by openssl?
If not: Are there any plans to
Hi!
Is there any possibility to let dovecot serve 1024 Bit DH Parameters at
SSL/TLS-connections? Is it possible to replace
/var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.ssl with DH-parameter generated by openssl?
If not: Are there any plans to implement that?
Thank you!