to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
From a performance perspective:
[...]
I use a filesystem that handles this better than ext3 such as XFS or Reiser.
Ext3 should be fine for huge directories these days
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:06:24PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
From a performance perspective:
[...]
I use a filesystem
On 7/2/2009, to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote:
[...] Yeah, I know Reiser should have better performance with [...]
Hm. I think Reiser is for those make sure you know what aou're doing.
I have myself some partitions on Reiser, but I'm not so sure I would
base critical stuff on it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:01:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/2/2009, to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote:
[...]
Hm. I think Reiser is [...]
Lets please stop with the FUD.
Oops. Sorry. I didn't want to step on anyone's toes.
Yes,
On 7/2/2009, to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote:
If you based your decision of what filesystem to use on whether or not
there have ever been any serious problems encountered with it, you
wouldn't have a computer.
No. I base my assessment on other people's experiences.
I said, '... any
From a performance perspective:
Which Directory layout is better:
1. All mailboxes are stored in a single directory and prefixed with a dot
or
2. Maildirs using physical directories, such as: Maildir/folder/subfolder/
It looks like the second option -- File Sytem Layout (LAYOUT=fs) --
could
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
From a performance perspective:
Which Directory layout is better:
1. All mailboxes are stored in a single directory and prefixed with a dot
or
2. Maildirs using physical directories, such as: Maildir/folder/subfolder/
It looks like the second option -- File
Seth,
XFS ussually performs better handling large files, and Reiser handling
small files
I also think that File system like XFS could handle Large Directoreis in
a better way: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/papers/xfs_usenix/index.html
Nevertheless, this thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
From a performance perspective:
[...]
I use a filesystem that handles this better than ext3 such as XFS or Reiser.
Ext3 should be fine for huge
