On 01/03/2010 19:56, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Ed W wrote:
Suggest drop them a line in the first instance? (You could check that
the COMPRESS stuff made it into the released build also since Timo
kindly added support for that to 2.0)
Lonelycat Games has sent me a fixed build and promi
On 2010-03-01 2:56 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> Suggest drop them a line in the first instance? (You could check that
>> the COMPRESS stuff made it into the released build also since Timo
>> kindly added support for that to 2.0)
> Lonelycat Games has sent me a fixed build and promised to have
Ed W wrote:
> Suggest drop them a line in the first instance? (You could check that
> the COMPRESS stuff made it into the released build also since Timo
> kindly added support for that to 2.0)
Lonelycat Games has sent me a fixed build and promised to have it
incorporated into the next version.
On 27/02/2010 17:07, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.2.2010, at 1.54, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in capabilities
before authentication, but 2.0 does not:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-February/047011.html explains this a bit
be
Hi,
Do you think there's any chance of getting Profimail fixed by
reporting this as a bug for them? Other new servers besides Dovecot
behave in a similar way.
I'll try. They are pretty active in development, but god knows how they
handle support queries. I've raised the issue with their suppor
On 27.2.2010, at 1.54, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in capabilities
> before authentication, but 2.0 does not:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-February/047011.html explains this a bit
better. I'll add IDLE to pre-login capabilities if I
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:37:59 -0500
Charles Marcus articulated:
> On 2/26/2010 6:54 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in
> > capabilities before authentication, but 2.0 does not:
>
> Correct... and according to Timo, this is proper IMAP proto
On 2/26/2010 6:54 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> The main difference seems to be that 1.2 advertises IDLE in capabilities
> before authentication, but 2.0 does not:
Correct... and according to Timo, this is proper IMAP protocol, so you'd
probably be better off taking this up with the Profimail devs
Hi,
I'm not sure whether the client or the server is at fault (probably the
client), but it's clearly a regression for me.
I'm using the LCG Profimail (http://lonelycatgames.com/?app=profimail)
application for my Symbian smartphone which has quite decent IMAP
capabilities. Amongst others it can
