Le 23 avr. 2013 à 12:37, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 14:07 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> [...]
>> Shouldn't it read "default_client_limit" instead of "default_client_count"?
>
> Yes, fixed.
Thanks, Timo.
>> It seems that the warning is written only when reloa
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 14:07 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As to be expected with low system limits, a warning may be written to the
> logs:
> master: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under
> max. load (256 < 1000), because of default_client_count
> Shoul
Hello,
As to be expected with low system limits, a warning may be written to the logs:
master: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under
max. load (256 < 1000), because of default_client_count
Shouldn't it read "default_client_limit" instead of "default_client_coun
