Hello,
Do you think Dovecot could handle millions of active users in a big
architecture ?
This cluster could be for example (each server is a bi quad Xeon 2.66 Ghz) :
- 40 Dovecot servers
- 4 LVS
- 20 Apache+PHP
- 2 Openldap
- 20 Postfix + ClamAV + SpamAssassin
- 1 NFS Netapps
For millions of
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:06 +, John fistack wrote:
> For millions of user it could be multiple different clusters of 40 Dovecot
> servers with 1 Netapp for each cluster.
> I want to work in NFS.
You'll want to read at least http://wiki.dovecot.org/NFS. Dovecot v1.1
makes problems with attribu
Hello,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:06:05 + (GMT) John fistack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you think Dovecot could handle millions of active users in a big
> architecture ?
>
Sure, but the architecture will play a bigger role than just
Dovecot.
> This cluster could be for example (each serv
On Thu, August 2, 2007 3:06 pm, John fistack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I know webmail.us use Dovecot, what is the most big dovecot architecture
> known ?
> Do you think Dovecot can handle 1 million of active users in a good
> architecture ?
Yep... and we have 500K very active users on it. We
Hi,
> > I know webmail.us use Dovecot, what is the most big dovecot architecture
> > known ?
> > Do you think Dovecot can handle 1 million of active users in a good
> > architecture ?
>
> Yep... and we have 500K very active users on it. We've scaled Dovecot
> horizontally without NFS, just lo
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:03:30PM -0400, Bill Boebel wrote:
> > Do you think it's a good solution to use one synchronised local Openldap on
> > each
> > server Dovecot ?
>
> No. I'd replicate your ldap database on a few servers that are dedicated
> to that purpose, and on each mail server use D
