All my users are virtual, using single uid on the server, so I haven't
had to deal with that issue.
-Greg
On 2011-07-21 4:02 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
>> I use the dspam plugin on my install: it only sends the signature.
>
> Cool, so, this is efficient then though not instant of course.
>
> I had
On 22/07/11 01:02, Steve Fatula wrote:
>> I use the dspam plugin on my install: it only sends the signature.
>
>
> Cool, so, this is efficient then though not instant of course.
>
> I had to change permissions of the dspam binary to 4511. Is that what you had
> to do? Otherwise, the logged in
> I use the dspam plugin on my install: it only sends the signature.
Cool, so, this is efficient then though not instant of course.
I had to change permissions of the dspam binary to 4511. Is that what you had
to do? Otherwise, the logged in user couldn't run dspam.
I use the dspam plugin on my install: it only sends the signature.
-Greg
On 2011-07-21 3:09 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
> Tried to find some doc on this (other than the c code), couldn't, so, asking.
> I do almost every programming language, except C!
>
> When using DSPAM backend with this tool, wi
Tried to find some doc on this (other than the c code), couldn't, so, asking. I
do almost every programming language, except C!
When using DSPAM backend with this tool, will the plugin send ONLY the
signature and not the entire message to dspam for retraining? Concerned about
very large emails.
