On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 15:40 +1300, Nikolai Schupbach wrote:
> >> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
> >> searches.
> >> Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
> >
> >Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
>
> I know this thread is quite old, but we have t
>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
>> searches.
>> Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>
>Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
I know this thread is quite old, but we have the same issue with v2.0.14 and
squat. Would this issue also affect the So
>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
>> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>
> Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
OK, thanks -- didn't think to look there. I see that it's a pretty long list.
I'll look for a workaround unless you thin
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:29 -0500, Tony Pyro wrote:
> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
On Dec 11, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Tony Pyro put forth on 12/10/2010 4:29 PM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
>> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>>
>> . search BODY "waldo"
>> * SEARCH
>> . OK Sea
Tony Pyro put forth on 12/10/2010 4:29 PM:
> Hello,
>
> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>
> . search BODY "waldo"
> * SEARCH
> . OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
> . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJEC
Hello,
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
. search BODY "waldo"
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
. SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" FROM "waldo"
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (1.768
