Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:55:45 -0600
> Von: Stan Hoeppner
> An: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What
> is best IMAP enabled webmail packageto go with Dovecot?
>
> O
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:23:50 -0500
> Von: Thomas Harold
> An: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What
> is best IMAP enabled webmail packageto go with Dovecot?
> On
On 1/6/2010 11:38 AM, Steve wrote:
An advice on another nice Web enabled mail client? Have you looked at
SOGo? Have a look at their online demo ->
http://www.scalableogo.org/tour/online_demo.html
It has more to offer then RoundCube (aka: Calendaring,
synchronization with Funambol, etc).
Ah? (
aja-li...@tni.org wrote:
> If you try Roundcube for a while you might find out nice features,
> like the "del" key works for deleting an email, drag and drop is
> possible, and there's "email auto completion" within the email compose
> window, and you can add email-addresses in emails to the addres
On 01/04/2010 10:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Hi,
So, what's the best FOSS IMAP enabled web mail front end with a
modern look/feel? I'd like to run it on lighttpd, which I'm already
using, not apache.
I'm using RoundCube 0.3.x (from the RoundCube website) + mysql + apache2
on Debian Lenny, a
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:31:18 -0600
> Von: Stan Hoeppner
> An: Dovecot Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What
> is best IMAP enabled webmail packageto go with Dovecot?
>
David Abrahams put forth on 1/5/2010 1:44 PM:
> At Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:08:22 +0100,
> Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
>>
>> Welcome!
>> Have a look at RoundCube webmail. I used to use squirrelmail but had the
>> same issues as you. RoundCube is very nice.
>
> I second that emotion
After a bit o
At Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:08:22 +0100,
Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
>
> Welcome!
> Have a look at RoundCube webmail. I used to use squirrelmail but had the
> same issues as you. RoundCube is very nice.
I second that emotion
--
Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.co
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like
is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds unnecessary
complexity
to the system and I'd rather avoid it if possible. IIRC, one of the
You can/could run Horde/IMP without a
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
So, what's the best FOSS IMAP enabled web mail front end with a modern
look/feel? I'd like to run it on lighttpd, which I'm already using,
not apache.
www.horde.org would work (there are debian ports). As to which is best,
depends on who you listen to. :)
--
Eric R
On 1/5/2010 1:32 AM, Ken Price wrote:
If this is more than a hobby system, then you'll need to account for
address books and personal settings for your users - at the least. That
means some sort of backend database.
I've been looking at Funambol lately to support some Blackberry users
(we're
On 1/4/2010 4:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I'd like to install a webmail package on the same host. I used Squirrelmail for
this purpose many years ago and I wasn't wholly impressed with the user
interface. I'm also not impressed by the fact that I regularly receive spam
from
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:15:54AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Ter, 05 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
> >don't like is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds
> >unnecessary complexity to the system and
On Ter, 05 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like
is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds unnecessary
complexity
to the system and I'd rather avoid it if possible. IIRC, one of the
reasons I
chose Squir
On 5.1.2010, at 10.17, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code. At least it's using boyer-moore with
>> some of my own uglyness to make it support incremental searches. Wonder if
>> there's a nicer and faster way to do that than what I implemented.
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> I'm no
Timo Sirainen put forth on 1/5/2010 1:32 AM:
> On 5.1.2010, at 7.44, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> As we can see from the 1% I/O wait on CPU0 and 0% on CPU1, it's seems pretty
>> clear that the CPUs are being occupied by the dovecot search code, not by
>> disk
>> I/O.
>
> v1.1+ has somewhat faster s
On 5.1.2010, at 7.44, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> As we can see from the 1% I/O wait on CPU0 and 0% on CPU1, it's seems pretty
> clear that the CPUs are being occupied by the dovecot search code, not by disk
> I/O.
v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code. At least it's using boyer-moore with
some of my
Rick Romero put forth on 1/4/2010 3:14 PM:
>
> Are you sure the CPU is pegged from CPU and not disk I/O? I used to
> import 160GB of InnoDB data on a quad core (U320/RAID 10) and after the
> cache would fill up, only 1 core would show as pegged because the disk
> I/O wasn't fast enough. Seems li
on, 4/1/10, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
From: Stan Hoeppner
Subject: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so
far. What is best IMAP enabled webmail package to go with Dovecot?
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Monday, 4 January, 2010, 23:00
Greetings everyone,
I'm new to the list as of
wrote:
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> Subject: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What is
> best IMAP enabled webmail package to go with Dovecot?
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Monday, 4 January, 2010, 23:00
> Greetings everyone,
>
> I'm ne
Are you sure the CPU is pegged from CPU and not disk I/O? I used to
import 160GB of InnoDB data on a quad core (U320/RAID 10) and after
the cache would fill up, only 1 core would show as pegged because the
disk I/O wasn't fast enough. Seems like the index on 10k messages
might be kinda
vecot.org]
> Namens Stan Hoeppner
> Verzonden: maandag 4 januari 2010 22:01
> Aan: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Onderwerp: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really
> impressed so far. What is best IMAP enabled webmail package
> to go with Dovecot?
>
>
> Greetings everyone,
Greetings everyone,
I'm new to the list as of today. I just installed Dovecot a couple of days ago
for the first time, Debian Lenny Dovecot v1.0.15-2.3. So far I'm pretty
impressed. I'm using mbox format with Dovecot auto-deciding to place mail in
user home directories, which is great. It work
23 matches
Mail list logo
