Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:55:45 -0600
Von: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What
is best IMAP enabled webmail packageto go with Dovecot?
On Thu
aja-li...@tni.org wrote:
If you try Roundcube for a while you might find out nice features,
like the del key works for deleting an email, drag and drop is
possible, and there's email auto completion within the email compose
window, and you can add email-addresses in emails to the address-book
On 1/6/2010 11:38 AM, Steve wrote:
An advice on another nice Web enabled mail client? Have you looked at
SOGo? Have a look at their online demo -
http://www.scalableogo.org/tour/online_demo.html
It has more to offer then RoundCube (aka: Calendaring,
synchronization with Funambol, etc).
Ah?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:23:50 -0500
Von: Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What
is best IMAP enabled webmail packageto go with Dovecot?
On 1/6
David Abrahams put forth on 1/5/2010 1:44 PM:
At Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:08:22 +0100,
Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
Welcome!
Have a look at RoundCube webmail. I used to use squirrelmail but had the
same issues as you. RoundCube is very nice.
I second that emotion
After a bit of
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:31:18 -0600
Von: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What
is best IMAP enabled webmail packageto go
On 01/04/2010 10:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Hi,
So, what's the best FOSS IMAP enabled web mail front end with a
modern look/feel? I'd like to run it on lighttpd, which I'm already
using, not apache.
I'm using RoundCube 0.3.x (from the RoundCube website) + mysql + apache2
on Debian Lenny,
Timo Sirainen put forth on 1/5/2010 1:32 AM:
On 5.1.2010, at 7.44, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
As we can see from the 1% I/O wait on CPU0 and 0% on CPU1, it's seems pretty
clear that the CPUs are being occupied by the dovecot search code, not by
disk
I/O.
v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code.
On 5.1.2010, at 10.17, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code. At least it's using boyer-moore with
some of my own uglyness to make it support incremental searches. Wonder if
there's a nicer and faster way to do that than what I implemented.
Hi Timo,
I'm not sure if
On Ter, 05 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like
is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds unnecessary
complexity
to the system and I'd rather avoid it if possible. IIRC, one of the
reasons I
chose
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:15:54AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Ter, 05 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds
unnecessary complexity to the system and I'd
On 1/4/2010 4:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I'd like to install a webmail package on the same host. I used Squirrelmail for
this purpose many years ago and I wasn't wholly impressed with the user
interface. I'm also not impressed by the fact that I regularly receive spam
On 1/5/2010 1:32 AM, Ken Price wrote:
If this is more than a hobby system, then you'll need to account for
address books and personal settings for your users - at the least. That
means some sort of backend database.
I've been looking at Funambol lately to support some Blackberry users
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
So, what's the best FOSS IMAP enabled web mail front end with a modern
look/feel? I'd like to run it on lighttpd, which I'm already using,
not apache.
www.horde.org would work (there are debian ports). As to which is best,
depends on who you
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like
is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds unnecessary
complexity
to the system and I'd rather avoid it if possible. IIRC, one of the
You can/could
At Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:08:22 +0100,
Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
Welcome!
Have a look at RoundCube webmail. I used to use squirrelmail but had the
same issues as you. RoundCube is very nice.
I second that emotion
--
Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
Greetings everyone,
I'm new to the list as of today. I just installed Dovecot a couple of days ago
for the first time, Debian Lenny Dovecot v1.0.15-2.3. So far I'm pretty
impressed. I'm using mbox format with Dovecot auto-deciding to place mail in
user home directories, which is great. It
]
Namens Stan Hoeppner
Verzonden: maandag 4 januari 2010 22:01
Aan: dovecot@dovecot.org
Onderwerp: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really
impressed so far. What is best IMAP enabled webmail package
to go with Dovecot?
Greetings everyone,
I'm new to the list as of today. I just
Are you sure the CPU is pegged from CPU and not disk I/O? I used to
import 160GB of InnoDB data on a quad core (U320/RAID 10) and after
the cache would fill up, only 1 core would show as pegged because the
disk I/O wasn't fast enough. Seems like the index on 10k messages
might be kinda
...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
From: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
Subject: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so far. What is
best IMAP enabled webmail package to go with Dovecot?
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Monday, 4 January, 2010, 23:00
Greetings everyone,
I'm new
.
--- On Mon, 4/1/10, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
From: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
Subject: [Dovecot] First time Dovecot user, really impressed so
far. What is best IMAP enabled webmail package to go with Dovecot?
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Monday, 4 January, 2010, 23:00
Rick Romero put forth on 1/4/2010 3:14 PM:
Are you sure the CPU is pegged from CPU and not disk I/O? I used to
import 160GB of InnoDB data on a quad core (U320/RAID 10) and after the
cache would fill up, only 1 core would show as pegged because the disk
I/O wasn't fast enough. Seems like
On 5.1.2010, at 7.44, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
As we can see from the 1% I/O wait on CPU0 and 0% on CPU1, it's seems pretty
clear that the CPUs are being occupied by the dovecot search code, not by disk
I/O.
v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code. At least it's using boyer-moore with
some of my
23 matches
Mail list logo
