-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Timo Sirainen wrote:
7. Don't index non-text data? For example if there is large block of
base64 data or something else that definitely doesn't look like text,
it's pretty useless to index it. Then again, we do want to index
On 5.12.2013, at 10.40, Steffen Kaiser skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de wrote:
9. Attachments can be translated to indexable UTF-8 text already with
fts_decoder setting by doing it via a conversion script. This could also
support Apache Tika server directly.
This means some kind of MIME type
Substring match is important to us, so we'd love to see Squat reinstated
with speed improvements. It seems like Solr can handle substrings as
well ([Edge]NGramFilterFactory), but for small deployments, having the
engine built right in is a plus.
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
1. Support for multiple languages. Use textcat while indexing to
guess the language of the indexed data.
FWIW, you could probably use the Content-Language header (if it
exists) to at least give a hint. No guarantee it is correct, but it's
a better
how [FTS indexing] could be improved for everyone in future
For sites which set client_limit 1 it would help performance not to stall for
INDEXER_WAIT_MSECS when polling the indexer for input. Currently dovecot
unwinds back out to the main command loop repeatedly to allow other clients to
On 2.12.2013, at 20.50, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
how [FTS indexing] could be improved for everyone in future
For sites which set client_limit 1 it would help performance not to stall
for INDEXER_WAIT_MSECS when polling the indexer for input. Currently dovecot
unwinds
On 12/02/2013 02:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Currently I’m thinking that most of the reasons for client_limit1 can be
avoided just by moving IMAP IDLE connections to a separate imap-idle process where
they wait until they have more work to do. Do you think that would work for you
also?
I was
Do you think [moving IMAP IDLE connections to a separate imap-idle process]
would work for you also?
Probably. It always depends on the details. Forking a new imap process every
time there's a little input to read or output to send might perform poorly
under load. Having a pool of ready
On 3.12.2013, at 0.09, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Do you think [moving IMAP IDLE connections to a separate imap-idle process]
would work for you also?
Probably. It always depends on the details. Forking a new imap process
every time there's a little input to read or
FTS indexing is something I hear quite often nowadays. I’ve added some hacks to
make it work better for some installations, but it’s about time to think about
the whole design and how it could be improved for everyone in future. Here are
some of my initial thoughts.
Currently Dovecot supports
10 matches
Mail list logo
