As best as I can tell, the answer seems to lie in "namespaces"
as a feature added in Dovecot 1.1.0. The problem is that I
don't understand how I could use them to resolve this
situation. I've read the documentation. I've looked at as many
example configurations as I could f
That did it! HOORAY! Thanks, Timo!
- Jon
On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 08:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/5/2008 7:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 13:33 -0700, Jon Fullmer wrote:
As best as I can tell, the answer seems to lie
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 08:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 11/5/2008 7:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 13:33 -0700, Jon Fullmer wrote:
> >> As best as I can tell, the answer seems to lie in "namespaces" as a
> >> feature added in Dovecot 1.1.0. The problem is that I don't
On 11/5/2008 7:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 13:33 -0700, Jon Fullmer wrote:
>> As best as I can tell, the answer seems to lie in "namespaces" as a
>> feature added in Dovecot 1.1.0. The problem is that I don't understand
>> how I could use them to resolve this situation.
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 13:33 -0700, Jon Fullmer wrote:
> As best as I can tell, the answer seems to lie in "namespaces" as a
> feature added in Dovecot 1.1.0. The problem is that I don't understand
> how I could use them to resolve this situation. I've read the
> documentation. I've looked at
This is the line from my master.cf:
dovecotunix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=XX:XX argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f $
{sender} -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] -n -m ${extension}
I'm not having a problem with a new mailbox being created (say,
"someone+spam
Jon Fullmer wrote:
I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all run
on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on the same
server in maildir format.
The logical path for incoming messages (as I understand it) is:
1) received by Postfix; handed off to Am
I didn't want to inundate the list with too much data. Here's the
output of "dovecot -n". Because I'm paranoid, some parts are
obfuscated with capital Xs:
# 1.1.6: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.27.4 ppc ext3
protocols: imaps
ssl_cert_file: XX
ssl_key_file: XXX
On 11/2/2008 3:33 PM, Jon Fullmer wrote:
> How must I change my Dovecot 1.1.x configuration so that my "plus
> addressing" set up (detailed above) will work again?
So, maybe it would be a good idea to actually provide some config
details? ;)
output of dovecot -n would a goo starting place...
--
Can you post your conf files ? I could try it on one of my setups. I
have no idea how to make + addressing tho >.<
Jon Fullmer wrote:
> I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all run
> on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on the
> same server in mail
I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all run
on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on the
same server in maildir format.
The logical path for incoming messages (as I understand it) is:
1) received by Postfix; handed off to Amavisd-new
2) Amavi
11 matches
Mail list logo
