* Michael [2010-01-20 10:02]:
[...]
> As long as the query can be different for LDA vs. POP3/Imap is good for
> me thanks.
>
> Having said that if there is no reason not to make it a configurable
> option for LDA vs. POP3 vs. Imap may as well go the full way?
Just of curiosity, have you tried r
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:49:26 you wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:12 +1300, Michael wrote:
> > How do I get IMAP+POP3 vs. LDA to use different user_query statements?
>
> Like Kirill said, you can use %s for it. But sure, it'll make the query
> bigger and uglier. Hopefully I'll manage to make v2.0
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:12 +1300, Michael wrote:
> How do I get IMAP+POP3 vs. LDA to use different user_query statements?
Like Kirill said, you can use %s for it. But sure, it'll make the query
bigger and uglier. Hopefully I'll manage to make v2.0 support something
like:
protocol lda {
userdb
* Michael [2010-01-15 12:12]:
How do I get IMAP+POP3 vs. LDA to use different user_query statements?
The problem is that the input fields are different.
I don't understand what you mean.
IMAP/POP3 is an email address
LDA is a username
Again, sorry, but I don't understand what you mean.
How do I get IMAP+POP3 vs. LDA to use different user_query statements?
The problem is that the input fields are different.
IMAP/POP3 is an email address
LDA is a username
I have written a long statement to try and cater for both however it still
only works 99% of the time, and the remaining 1%
