We tried one time software solution, not very reliable under load, we move
to coyotepoint equalizer hardware load balancer, very good cost and
excellent reliable
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
Hello,
I've been thinking about the best way to achieve
On 6/6/2013 9:34 πμ, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
We tried one time software solution, not very reliable under load
Could you please provide some details of that software solution setup?
Thanks,
Nick
Am 06.06.2013 09:28, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 6/6/2013 9:34 πμ, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
We tried one time software solution, not very reliable under load
Could you please provide some details of that software solution setup?
Thanks,
Nick
for loadbalancing keepalived is easy to setup,
On 31-05-2013 12:57, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Romer Ventura schrieb:
Scenario1: This should allow any to lose any of the servers and
clients still have access to their emails (although I am not sure how
the indexes would react to this and sudden disconnection)
- 2 Dovecot
Romer Ventura schrieb:
Scenario1: This should allow any to lose any of the servers and clients
still have access to their emails (although I am not sure how the indexes
would react to this and sudden disconnection)
- 2 Dovecot Proxy servers, using a virtual IP to where the clients
On 31-05-2013 12:57, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Romer Ventura schrieb:
Scenario1: This should allow any to lose any of the servers and
clients
still have access to their emails (although I am not sure how the
indexes
would react to this and sudden disconnection)
- 2 Dovecot Proxy
I am actually going through the first stages of implementing your
Scenario1.
There is small difference: there will also be 2*Postfix relays also on
the
Dovecot Proxies. This allows placing them in a DMZ such that the real
Dovecot/Postfix servers are placed away from the WAN.
After much arguing
Am 29.05.2013 22:46, schrieb Andreas Kasenides:
I should say that other more complicated setups like full blown clusters
and
distributed file systems have been rejected due to their complexity (and
the
fact we do not have experience with them).
Our user base is around 3-4K of heavy users.
i
Hello,
I've been thinking about the best way to achieve load balancing and making
my mail servers highly available. So far I believe I have 2 scenarios:
Scenario1: This should allow any to lose any of the servers and clients
still have access to their emails (although I am not sure how the
