Re: [Dovecot] MOSTLY SOLVED: Re: client limit and STARTTLS

2013-04-08 Thread Noel Butler
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 01:09 -0700, David Benfell wrote: > > Are your certificate chains valid? Simply saying "isn't working" is > > almost a requirement for a *sigh* > > log output please, or a better description than "isn't working" ;) > Yes, the certificate chains were screwed up. And you

Re: [Dovecot] MOSTLY SOLVED: Re: client limit and STARTTLS

2013-04-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.04.2013 12:36, schrieb David Benfell: > On 04/07/2013 03:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 06.04.2013 10:09, schrieb David Benfell: >>> So I changed it again: >>> >>> default_process_limit = 128 default_client_limit = 512 >>> >>> And now it seems to be fine. But I'm mystified because what y

Re: [Dovecot] MOSTLY SOLVED: Re: client limit and STARTTLS

2013-04-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.04.2013 10:09, schrieb David Benfell: > So I changed it again: > > default_process_limit = 128 > default_client_limit = 512 > > And now it seems to be fine. But I'm mystified because what you say is > the case on your system, that is, that the process limit needs to be > greater than the

[Dovecot] MOSTLY SOLVED: Re: client limit and STARTTLS

2013-04-07 Thread David Benfell
Hi Noel, On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:43:02PM +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > > > Second question: STARTTLS isn't working. What am I missing? Sorry if > > this is something that should be obvious; I'm fighting a similar > > battle with postfix and I'm being pushed around the bend while I > > really nee