Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full available bandwidth
due to high RTT and send command wait for
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full available bandwidth
due to high RTT and send command wait for response nature of POP3 and
IMAP4
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 22:20 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full available bandwidth
due to high
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:20:41 +0200
Andrzej Adam Filip andrzej.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full available
bandwidth due to high RTT and
Ben Winslow r...@bluecherry.net wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:20:41 +0200
Andrzej Adam Filip andrzej.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full available bandwidth
due to high RTT and send command wait for response nature of POP3 and
IMAP4 protocols.
--
[plen: Andrew]
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 22:20 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Could you offer some suggestion how to fetch mailbox content over
high RTT link (with negligible packet loss)?
Currently I use IMAP+IDLE *but* it fails to use full available bandwidth
due to high RTT and send command wait for
