Re: [Dovecot] One user having reproducible IMAP issues

2007-03-19 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:17:24PM -0700, Alex Boster wrote: > Thanks -- we figured it out, but that is good to see. > > Yes, it was 0.99 but has been upgraded. We are filtering out the > problematic headers and removed them from the "broken" mbox files. > Everything is working fine now. >

Re: [Dovecot] One user having reproducible IMAP issues

2007-03-18 Thread Alex Boster
Thanks -- we figured it out, but that is good to see. Yes, it was 0.99 but has been upgraded. We are filtering out the problematic headers and removed them from the "broken" mbox files. Everything is working fine now. I'm on rc26, but will go to rc27 when there is a CentOS 4 / RHEL 4 so

Re: [Dovecot] One user having reproducible IMAP issues

2007-03-18 Thread John Robinson
On 16/03/2007 19:06, Alex Boster wrote: Does anyone have a quick recipe for how to do the filtering? We are on CentOS 4 using a near default setup... Does that mean dovecot 0.99? If so you ought to build or download something more recent (ready-made latest is available from atrpms.net) The

Re: [Dovecot] One user having reproducible IMAP issues

2007-03-16 Thread Alex Boster
Does anyone have a quick recipe for how to do the filtering? We are on CentOS 4 using a near default setup... Thanks for the help! Alex On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:26 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 13:26 -0700, Alex Boster wrote: X-IMAPbase: 1173814340 4280058374 $NotJunk JunkRecor

Re: [Dovecot] One user having reproducible IMAP issues

2007-03-16 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 13:26 -0700, Alex Boster wrote: X-IMAPbase: 1173814340 4280058374 $NotJunk JunkRecorded X-UID: 4280058361 This is your problem. Your UID has gotten higher than 2^31 which confuses many clients, even though it's still valid from IMAP pr