Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-30 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2010-12-30 6:19 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:32 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: >> Also, if we change the separator, do we have to change it on the subscription >> file ? Could it be the source of my problem ? > No. TB just seems to break down if separator is changed. Recreat

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:32 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > Also, if we change the separator, do we have to change it on the subscription > file ? Could it be the source of my problem ? No. TB just seems to break down if separator is changed. Recreating the account should be an easy solution. si

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-23 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:19:22PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > 20101223-135556-38406.in:5 select "AA/BB/CC/foobar" I forgot to mention that some of those mailboxes were not touched at all by the user during the period where dovecot was using "/". And now that dovecot is back to what it was (1.2

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-23 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:19:22PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: Also, if we change the separator, do we have to change it on the subscription file ? Could it be the source of my problem ? -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-23 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:03:00PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: So basically, I went from 1.2 with #separator = -> can you confirm the the client should use "." then ? to 2.8.0 with namespace { type = private separator = "/" and now back to 2.8.0 with namespace {

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 09:52:51PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > in 1.2.12, I left the separator= commented out, so I had the default. > in 2.0.8 I set separator = / myself. > > Still I can't see why it would lead TB to use a dot in a previously existing > mailbox name. Could it be that because

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:44:28PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > No, default is '.' with maildir. Oh my god, you're right : in 1.2.12, I left the separator= commented out, so I had the default. in 2.0.8 I set separator = / myself. Still I can't see why it would lead TB to use a dot in a previo

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 22.12.2010, at 22.31, Thomas Hummel wrote: > And you have namespace separator set to '/'? > > Yes (which is the default, isn't it ?) No, default is '.' with maildir. >> In such setup having '.' just isn't valid. All '.' characters in the >> directory name get converted to '/'. > > I know,

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 07:12:29PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Thanks and sorry for the fuzzy description but it's all I've got for now ;-( > So you have Maildir++ layout and you don't have listescape plugin? Yes. And you have namespace separator set to '/'? Yes (which is the default, isn't i

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 22.12.2010, at 18.38, Thomas Hummel wrote: > A user couldn't move a message from .Sent/ to .GVV-tangy.GVV/ > Thunderbird said : > > Character not allowed in mailbox name: '.'. So you have Maildir++ layout and you don't have listescape plugin? And you have namespace separator set to '/'? In

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:28:07PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > > > hmmm, not so sure as some other user states the message (which I still > > haven't > > seen myself) talks about "." as the invalid character. > > And finally one

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:28:07PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > hmmm, not so sure as some other user states the message (which I still haven't > seen myself) talks about "." as the invalid character. And finally one case correctly described : A user couldn't move a message from .Sent/ to .GVV-t

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > However, some info seems to confirm that it involves moving a message from a > mailbox to another where one of the mailbox has got non-ASCII character. A > restart of TB seems to fix the problem indeed. hmmm, not so sure as some oth

Re: [Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:13:20PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > This is user input so I don't have any details nor sufficient element to > consider it a real problem. A Thunderbird restart seems to solve the problem. However, some info seems to confirm that it involves moving a message from a ma

[Dovecot] Reverting from 2.0. to 1.2

2010-12-22 Thread Thomas Hummel
Hello Timo, I switched this morning from dovecot-1.2.12 to 2.0.8 with a basic setup (high performance login mode, Maildir, everyhing on NFS, one shared but unused namespace). No problem so far except that some Thunderbird users who wouldn't succeed in moving messages from some one folder to anot