On 11/22/2013 11:52 AM, Tibor Korocz wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a strange problem and I couldn't find any solution, I hope somebody
> could help me.
> I'm using postfix+dovecot+sieve combination and I tried to set up redirect.
>
> .sieve:
> require ["fileinto", "regex", "date", "relational", "vac
Hi Guys,
I have a strange problem and I couldn't find any solution, I hope somebody
could help me.
I'm using postfix+dovecot+sieve combination and I tried to set up redirect.
.sieve:
require ["fileinto", "regex", "date", "relational", "vacation"];
redirect "x...@gmail.com";
keep;
But I get some
Александр Алексеевич
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] sieve redirect envelope address problem
At 12PM +1100 on 8/05/13 you (Костырев Александр Алексеевич) wrote:
>
> I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
> I've configured sieve rule that redi
At 12PM +1100 on 8/05/13 you (Костырев Александр Алексеевич) wrote:
>
> I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
> I've configured sieve rule that redirects any mail coming to user to
> gmail mailbox (or whatever external mail system there is).
> But when sieve redirects any ma
:30 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] sieve redirect envelope address problem
Am 08.05.2013 03:24, schrieb Костырев Александр Алексеевич:
> Good day!
>
> I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
> I've configured sieve rule that redirects any ma
Am 08.05.2013 03:24, schrieb Костырев Александр Алексеевич:
> Good day!
>
> I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
> I've configured sieve rule that redirects any mail coming to user to gmail
> mailbox (or whatever external mail system there is).
> But when sieve redirects
Good day!
I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
I've configured sieve rule that redirects any mail coming to user to gmail
mailbox (or whatever external mail system there is).
But when sieve redirects any mail it puts vmail@%dovecot_hostname% into
envelope address, gives it
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:20 -0300, Thiago Henrique wrote:
>
> Jun 9 18:49:37 box7 dovecot: lmtp(10734, u...@server.com): Fatal:
> execv(/usr/sbin/sendmail) failed: Permission denied
SELinux maybe preventing this? An alternative would be to use the new
submission_host parameter.
Thursday, June 9, 2011, 3:20:34 PM, Thiago wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm running Dovecot 2.0.13 on my Ubuntu10.04. It's working very well but
> I faced a problem with Redirect and Vacation using Sieve. :-(
> In fact, after well configuring the system I dont't receive the redirect
> message, and in the lo
Hello,
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.13 on my Ubuntu10.04. It's working very well but
I faced a problem with Redirect and Vacation using Sieve. :-(
In fact, after well configuring the system I dont't receive the redirect
message, and in the log I found:
#
On 2010-09-23 17:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:33 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:00 +0200, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
2010-09-23T09:25:23+02:00 st1/192.168.10.201 dovecot: [ID 583609
mail.error] master: Error: service(lmtp): child 15524 killed with s
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:33 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:00 +0200, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> > 2010-09-23T09:25:23+02:00 st1/192.168.10.201 dovecot: [ID 583609
> > mail.error] master: Error: service(lmtp): child 15524 killed with signal
> > 11 (core not dumped)
> >
> > in c
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:00 +0200, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> 2010-09-23T09:25:23+02:00 st1/192.168.10.201 dovecot: [ID 583609
> mail.error] master: Error: service(lmtp): child 15524 killed with signal
> 11 (core not dumped)
>
> in case user home directory is (erroneously) undefined.
I can't reprodu
Hi, while executing simple sieve script:
require ["fileinto", "envelope"];
if header :contains "subject" "test" { redirect "u...@domain"; }
we got:
2010-09-23T09:25:23+02:00 st1/192.168.10.201 dovecot: [ID 583609
mail.error] master: Error: service(lmtp): child 15524 killed with signal
11 (cor
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:38:45 -0400
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/22/2009, Stephan Bosch (step...@rename-it.nl) wrote:
> > What is your exact application? I can take this issue to the Sieve
> > mailinglist.
>
> One use case I would need is for a spam bucket.
>
> We have an out-sourced anti-spam
On 10/22/2009, Stephan Bosch (step...@rename-it.nl) wrote:
> What is your exact application? I can take this issue to the Sieve
> mailinglist.
One use case I would need is for a spam bucket.
We have an out-sourced anti-spam service, and I have more than a few
ancient email addresses that get not
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:01:59 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> What is your exact application? I can take this issue to the Sieve
> mailinglist.
Cool. I will elaborate more fully then. Since this is not a dovecot
specific problem, I will reply to you directly.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
|=
Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:01:14 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward
a message as an attachment rather than in-line?
Unfortunately, no. I thought the (draft) enclose extension could
provide this new feature, bu
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:01:14 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
> > Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward
> > a message as an attachment rather than in-line?
> >
> Unfortunately, no. I thought the (draft) enclose extension could
> provide this new feature, bu
Jerry wrote:
Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward a
message as an attachment rather than in-line?
Unfortunately, no. I thought the (draft) enclose extension could provide
this new feature, but the specification explicitly excludes redirect
from being affected:
Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward a
message as an attachment rather than in-line?
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
|===
|===
|===
|===
|
A woman was in love with fourteen soldiers, it was clearly platoonic.
On Saturday 26 September 2009 16:21:34 Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Andreas Ntaflos schreef:
> > As explained, in the user's sieve script the "keep" after the
> > redirect action is ignored when the backup mails script uses an
> > explicit "keep" after "fileinto", but not when "fileinto" is used
> > with
Andreas Ntaflos schreef:
As explained, in the user's sieve script the "keep" after the redirect
action is ignored when the backup mails script uses an explicit "keep"
after "fileinto", but not when "fileinto" is used with "copy".
Why?
Because you have tripped a bug that is fixed in the reposi
On Saturday 26 September 2009 02:40:40 Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 09/26/2009 02:27 AM Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > …
> > Funny thing is that it doesn't work here, even when I strip it down
> > to just the two lines:
> >
> > redirect "f...@example.org"
> > keep;
>
> Hm, sorry no idea what could be the r
On 09/26/2009 02:27 AM Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> …
> Funny thing is that it doesn't work here, even when I strip it down to
> just the two lines:
>
> redirect "f...@example.org"
> keep;
Hm, sorry no idea what could be the reason for this behavior.
> What version of Dovecot and Sieve are you usi
On Saturday 26 September 2009 02:17:34 Pascal Volk wrote:
> Your script looks strange for me. I'm simply using:
>
> # sieve script start
> redirect "u...@example.com";
> keep;
> # sieve script end (no conditions)
Hi,
thanks for the reply. I know it looks strange but that is how Ingo
(Horde's f
On 09/26/2009 02:01 AM Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Dovecot 1.2.4 and the new Sieve implementation in version 0.1.12,
> I ran into a problem that could indicate a bug in Sieve.
>
> The following is a simple script (as generated by Horde's Ingo
> application) to redirect incoming mail
Hi,
Using Dovecot 1.2.4 and the new Sieve implementation in version 0.1.12,
I ran into a problem that could indicate a bug in Sieve.
The following is a simple script (as generated by Horde's Ingo
application) to redirect incoming mail and also keep a copy of the
message in the local inbox:
if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> How do you look at adding one more header, for example X-Sieve-Forward-From:
>
> Now, when redirect action is in use - mail forwards using sendmail command line interface. The problem that there is no sui
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
Hello Stephan,
First of all, thank you for dovecot-sieve implementation.
I see that you are adding X-Sieve header to all outgoing e-mail in cmd-redirect.c
/* Prepend sieve version header (should not affect signatures) */
rfc2822_header_field_write(f, "X-Sieve", SIEVE
Hello Stephan,
First of all, thank you for dovecot-sieve implementation.
I see that you are adding X-Sieve header to all outgoing e-mail in
cmd-redirect.c
/* Prepend sieve version header (should not affect signatures) */
rfc2822_header_field_write(f, "X-Sieve", SIEVE_IMPLEMENTATION);
How do y
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
Mail rejections were fixed to use -f parameter, but I guess forwards
should too. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/b217c085ba15
Thanks ;)
--
Toorop http://www.flickr.com/photos/toorop/
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 17:02 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/file/1.1.14/src/deliver/mail-send.c
>
> at line 178, the return path is not taken from the -f parameter for
> forwarded messages. It is in stead extracted from the message itself and
> the address is not
Toorop wrote:
Plateform: gentoo + qmail
My deliver line is in a .qmail-USER file:
|/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f ${SENDER:-<>} -d
u...@domain.tld
I notice that sieve implementation in Dovecot use double ">" for the
envelop sender when there is a redirect command in s
Hi,
Plateform: gentoo + qmail
My deliver line is in a .qmail-USER file:
|/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f ${SENDER:-<>} -d
u...@domain.tld
I notice that sieve implementation in Dovecot use double ">" for the
envelop sender when there is a redirect command in sieve scrip
James Butler schreef:
Is there an alternative to the "redirect" Sieve capability?
For example:
if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
stop;
}
How can I do the above without usin
maybe you need to include vacation?
require "vacation";
if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
stop;
}
> Is there an alternative to the "redirect" Sieve capability?
>
> For example:
>
> if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
> redirect "list-us...@example.com";
> redirect "list-us...@example.com";
> redirect "list-us...@example.com";
> stop;
> }
>
> How can I do the above without using "
Is there an alternative to the "redirect" Sieve capability?
For example:
if header :contains "Subject" "Listserv" {
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
redirect "list-us...@example.com";
stop;
}
How can I do the above without using "redirect"?
Unfortuna
39 matches
Mail list logo
