On 27.2.2013, at 23.15, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL?
PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very
lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others...
On 28/02/2013 14:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.2.2013, at 23.15, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL?
PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very
lightweight compared to
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:26:43 +
Ed W articulated:
I believe the high profile user of polarssl is the Dutch government
who have approved OpenVPN + PolarSSL for use. (The point being that
openssl is just too huge to audit for security)
Just because a program has a large footprint does not
Am 01.03.2013 01:02, schrieb Jerry:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:26:43 +
Ed W articulated:
I believe the high profile user of polarssl is the Dutch government
who have approved OpenVPN + PolarSSL for use. (The point being that
openssl is just too huge to audit for security)
Just because
On 2/28/2013 4:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 01:02, schrieb Jerry:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:26:43 +
Ed W articulated:
I believe the high profile user of polarssl is the Dutch government
who have approved OpenVPN + PolarSSL for use. (The point being that
openssl is just too
Hey Timo,
Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL?
PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very
lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others...
https://polarssl.org/
I guess it could be a lot of work, or not, anyway, I'm
